On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21071533

0 signed · 6 inferred · view as graph
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredbackground →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19423388 [isCorrectedBy / corrects T167] — T167 Spin-1 Photon and Spin-2 Graviton; Theorem 4 partition 8 = 4_grav + 1_EM + 3_colour revised to 2 + 6; photon/graviton physics standszenodo-depositor-declared
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19430691 [references] — T169 1/alpha = 137; already on record as a settled E8 identity "not under revision"; only the "4_grav" prose justification of the 4 is amended to rank(E8)/2 = 4zenodo-depositor-declared
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19431882 [references] — T169 Second Addendum (additivity of 133 + 4 via the photon centralizer); its restatement of "4_grav + 1_EM + 3_colour" inherits the same prose correctionzenodo-depositor-declared
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19424796 [references] — T168 Gertsenshtein; unaffected (uses the physical 4D polarization count + the (56, ±1) sector of E8 ⊃ E7 x U(1))zenodo-depositor-declared
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19743998 [references] — T211 QCD from E8 ⊃ E6 x SU(3); the rigorous decomposition 248 = (78,1)+(1,8)+(27,3)+(27-bar,3-bar) giving the correct rank split 2 + 6 and the eight gluons as (1,8)zenodo-depositor-declared
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20766631 [references] — T257 Which SU(3) Does E8 Force?; the maximal-decomposition SU(3) is the FAMILY triplet, colour SU(3) only at a deeper embedding (E6 -> SO(10) -> SU(5) -> SU(3)_colour) — reinforcing that "3_colour" is misattributed in the maximal partition Note: the rank-versus-dimension discipline applied here (a partition of rank(E8)=8 must use the RANKS of the sector groups, not their representation dimensions) is a standard Lie-theory fact; no separate prior PUH note is cited for it.zenodo-depositor-declared
Watch this work.
One email when a new claim lands here — something that cites, supports, or refutes it. Nothing else, ever. Leave anytime: the unsubscribe link in any alert, or one line to info@citestamp.com.
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.