Reference health
Indicators of maturity in apricots using biplot multivariate analysis
3/3 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-23
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 3 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0315-5463(76)73592-2
Relationship of Maturity as Indicated by Flesh Color to Quality of Canned Clingstone Peaches
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAlveyNGet al1983GENSTAT—A General Statistical Program. Rothamsted Experimental Station Rothamsted.
no DOI — not checkedBrownGS1987Tour of Knoxfield Horticultural Research Institute Melbourne Fruit and Vegetable Markets and Melbourne Flower Markets. Internal Report. Dept Agriculture Tasmania.
no DOI — not checkedBrownGS WalkerTD1990A survey and comparison of apricot maturity preferences of the consumer and the wholesaler. Internal report Dept Primary Industry Tasmania.
no DOI — not checkedDahlenburgA1975Comparison of the fruit maturation of two apricot cultivars.Report No 13/75 South Australian Dept Agriculture Horticulture Branch.
no DOI — not checkedInterpreting Multivariate Data
no DOI — not checkedOfficial Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists
no DOI — not checkedProtecting stone fruits during handling and storage
no DOI — not checkedInfluence of cooling and temperature maintenance on stone fruit quality
no DOI — not checkedDevelopment and evaluation of objective maturity indices for Californian freestone peaches
no DOI — not checkedEvaluation of objective maturity indices for Halehaven peaches
no DOI — not checkedStudies on maturity standard of New Castle apricot
no DOI — not checkedFurther results on picking maturity standards for export plums
no DOI — not checkedPicking maturity of Laetitia and Casselman plums for export
no DOI — not checkedMaturity standards for export plums
no DOI — not checkedDetermination of maturity in apricots by instrumental measurement of flesh firmness and colour
no DOI — not checkedMaturity indices for nectarines
no DOI — not checkedOptimum picking maturity for apricots—preliminary results and recommendations
no DOI — not checkedPicking maturity of stone fruits
no DOI — not checkedColour charts: useful guide to evaluate fruit maturation. 1. Colorimetric specifications of colour charts for Japanese pear, apple, peach, grape, kaki and citrus fruits Bull Fruit Tree Res Stn (Ministry of Agriculture
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/jsfa.2740530305"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/jsfa.2740530305/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/jsfa.2740530305)