Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a publisher retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
15 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
How the doctorate contributes to the formation of active researchers: what the research tells us
The 15 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMillennials will make online sharing in networks a lifelong habit
no DOI — not checkedSocial research methods
no DOI — not checkedCIBER. (2016 August).Early career researchers: The harbingers of change(Harbingers Working Rep. 4). CIBER. Retrieved fromhttp://ciber-research.eu/download/20160916-Harbingers-research_instruments.pdf
no DOI — not checkedCIBER(2017 November).Early career researchers: The harbingers of change?(Report on Year Two from CIBER). Retrieved fromhttp://ciber-research.eu/download/20180219-ECR-harbingers-ReportYearTwo-2017.pdf
no DOI — not checkedCIBER(2018 December).Early career researchers: The harbingers of change? Final report. Retrieved fromhttp://ciber-research.eu/download/20181218-Harbingers3_Final_Report-Nov2018.pdf
no DOI — not checkedResearch methods in education
no DOI — not checkedYoung researchers demand open access. Interview with Ralf Schimmer and Ulrich Pöschl on new developments
no DOI — not checkedThe global state of young scientists – Project report and recommendations
no DOI — not checkedGould J.(2015 20 October). Six myths about open access were addressed in an open research workshop at the 2015 Naturejobs Career Expo in London.Nature Blog[Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://blogs.nature.com/naturejobs/2015/10/20/open-research-open-up-to-open-access/Gould
no DOI — not checkedThe age of precarity and the new challenges to the academic profession
no DOI — not checkedJones P.(2014 6 October).Phil Jones on the changing role of the postdoc and why publishers should care[Web log post].The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved fromhttps://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2014/10/06/guest-post-phill-jones-on-the-changing-role-of-the-postdoc-and-why-publishers-should-care/
no DOI — not checkedLERU – League of European Research Universities. (2010).Harvesting talent: Strengthening research careers in Europe. Retrieved fromwww.leru.org/files/Strengthening-Research-Careers-in-Europe-Full-paper.pdf
no DOI — not checkedRacing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs
no DOI — not checkedMillennials: Confident. Connected. Open to change
no DOI — not checkedExploratory data analysis
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a publisher retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-14 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.