Reference health

3D printed bioceramic scaffolds: Adjusting pore dimension is beneficial for mandibular bone defects repair

https://doi.org/10.1002/term.3287
CiteStamped reference-health badge
57/57 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

The 57 checked references that resolve
resolves10.3390/jfb9010025
Bioactive Glasses: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
resolves10.1002/jbm.b.34462
Synthesis and in vivo evaluation of a scaffold containing wollastonite/β‐TCP for bone repair in a rabbit tibial defect model
resolves10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.040
Fabrication and characterization of hydroxyapatite/sodium alginate/chitosan composite microspheres for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.022
β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: Synthesis and properties
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.076
Biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for bone reconstruction: A review of biological response
resolves10.1016/j.msec.2019.110289
Influence of the pore size and porosity of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V ELI porous scaffold on cell proliferation, osteogenesis and bone ingrowth
resolves10.1002/adhm.201200106
Neovascularization in Biodegradable Inverse Opal Scaffolds with Uniform and Precisely Controlled Pore Sizes
resolves10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.19039
Bone allografts
resolves10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.03.009
Additive manufacturing of biodegradable porous orthopaedic screw
resolves10.1186/1741-7015-9-66
Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions
resolves10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107937
Calcium silicate scaffolds promoting bone regeneration via the doping of Mg2+ or Mn2+ ion
resolves10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.039
Biphasic calcium phosphates bioceramics (HA/TCP): Concept, physicochemical properties and the impact of standardization of study protocols in biomaterials research
resolves10.1002/adma.201907142
Nanomaterial Patterning in 3D Printing
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.019
A strong, tough, and osteoconductive hydroxyapatite mineralized polyacrylamide/dextran hydrogel for bone tissue regeneration
resolves10.1080/09205063.2018.1554833
Reconstruction of calvarial bone defects using poly(amino acid)/hydroxyapatite/calcium sulfate composite
resolves10.1177/2041731418776819
Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management
resolves10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.040
Highly porous polycaprolactone scaffolds doped with calcium silicate and dicalcium phosphate dihydrate designed for bone regeneration
resolves10.1038/srep23367
Beta-tricalcium phosphate granules improve osteogenesis in vitro and establish innovative osteo-regenerators for bone tissue engineering in vivo
resolves10.1088/1748-605X/ab4238
<i>In vivo</i> therapeutic effect of wollastonite and hydroxyapatite on bone defect
resolves10.1002/jbm.b.34396
Composition control in biphasic silicate microspheres on stimulating new bone regeneration and repair of osteoporotic femoral bone defect
resolves10.3389/fphys.2018.00960
Osteoconductive Microarchitecture of Bone Substitutes for Bone Regeneration Revisited
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.034
Thorough analysis of silicon substitution in biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics: A multi-technique study
resolves10.5312/wjo.v6.i6.449
Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review
resolves10.1111/jcpe.13058
Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?
resolves10.1007/s12011-016-0635-1
Simvastatin Effect on Calcium and Silicon Plasma Levels in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoarthritis
resolves10.1557/mrs2001.72
The DMD<sup>TM</sup> Projection Display Chip: A MEMS-Based Technology
resolves10.1002/jbm.1069
Pore diameter of more than 100 μm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits
resolves10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.018
Nonstoichiometric wollastonite bioceramic scaffolds with core-shell pore struts and adjustable mechanical and biodegradable properties
resolves10.1007/978-1-0716-0520-2_6
Stereolithography 3D Bioprinting
resolves10.1002/adhm.201801298
A Novel Bone Substitute with High Bioactivity, Strength, and Porosity for Repairing Large and Load‐Bearing Bone Defects
resolves10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.01.002
Effect of light attenuation on polymerization of ceramic suspensions for stereolithography
resolves10.1039/C6TB00449K
The outstanding mechanical response and bone regeneration capacity of robocast dilute magnesium-doped wollastonite scaffolds in critical size bone defects
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.013
Calcium phosphate cements: Optimization toward biodegradability
resolves10.1002/jbm.b.34706
Review on current limits and potentialities of technologies for biomedical ceramic scaffolds production
resolves10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.050
A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering
resolves10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101168
Redefining architectural effects in 3D printed scaffolds through rational design for optimal bone tissue regeneration
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.033
Magnesium-based bioceramics in orthopedic applications
resolves10.3390/ma10020153
Doped Calcium Silicate Ceramics: A New Class of Candidates for Synthetic Bone Substitutes
resolves10.1111/prd.12250
Cellular therapy in periodontal regeneration
resolves10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013
Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: Three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants
resolves10.1039/C8BM01498A
La-Doped mesoporous calcium silicate/chitosan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
resolves10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.12.003
Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges
resolves10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.010
Osteogenesis of 3D printed porous Ti6Al4V implants with different pore sizes
resolves10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.029
Natural and synthetic polymers/bioceramics/bioactive compounds-mediated cell signalling in bone tissue engineering
resolves10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.096
Current advances in bone tissue engineering concerning ceramic and bioglass scaffolds: A review
resolves10.1002/mabi.200400026
Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the Art and Future Trends
resolves10.1177/0300060518770940
Calcium silicate as a graft material for bone fractures: a systematic review
resolves10.1039/C5RA21340A
Systematic investigation of β-dicalcium silicate-based bone cements in vitro and in vivo in comparison with clinically applied calcium phosphate cement and Bio-Oss®
resolves10.1038/srep34029
Systematical Evaluation of Mechanically Strong 3D Printed Diluted magnesium Doping Wollastonite Scaffolds on Osteogenic Capacity in Rabbit Calvarial Defects
resolves10.3390/ijms22073607
The Effect of Pore Size Distribution and l-Lysine Modified Apatite Whiskers (HAP) on Osteoblasts Response in PLLA/HAP Foam Scaffolds Obtained in the Thermally Induced Phase Separation Process
resolves10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069
Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment
resolves10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00108-3
Injectable biodegradable materials for orthopedic tissue engineering
resolves10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004
3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds
resolves10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.012
Simultaneous mechanical property and biodegradation improvement of wollastonite bioceramic through magnesium dilute doping
resolves10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725
3D printing of Haversian bone–mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.001
Calcium phosphate cements for bone substitution: Chemistry, handling and mechanical properties
resolves10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039
Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/term.3287"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/term.3287/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/term.3287/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1002/term.3287)