Reference health
AI Regulation in the EU: The Future Interplay Between Frameworks
31/31 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-11
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 31 checked references that resolve
resolves10.5040/9781509940691.ch-013
Digital Sovereignty in the EU: Challenges and Future Perspectives
resolves10.34632/mclawreview.2022.11304
Humpty Dumpty and High-Risk AI Systems: The Ratione Materiae Dimension of the Proposal for an EU Artificial Intelligence Act
resolves10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.16
Transnational Digital Governance and Its Impact on Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.3390/j4040043
The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act—A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)
resolves10.1177/2053951719860542
Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns
resolves10.1007/s43681-021-00127-3
From AI ethics principles to data science practice: a reflection and a gap analysis based on recent frameworks and practical experience
resolves10.1007/s12027-018-0546-z
Understanding the legal provisions that allow processing and profiling of personal data—an analysis of GDPR provisions and principles
resolves10.48550/arXiv.2302.10766
Bridging the Transparency Gap: What Can Explainable AI Learn From the AI Act?
resolves10.2139/ssrn.4279796
The European AI Liability Directives – Critique of a Half-Hearted Approach and Lessons for the Future
resolves10.1093/grurint/ikac107
Governance of IoT Data: Why the EU Data Act Will not Fulfill Its Objectives
resolves10.21552/edpl/2021/4/13
European Union ∙ The Concept of Data Altruism of the draft DGA and the GDPR: Inconsistencies and Why a Regulatory Sandbox Model May Facilitate Data Sharing in the EU
resolves10.2139/ssrn.4377481
Institutionalised Distrust and Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence: Toward a Democratic Design of AI Governance under the European Union AI Act
resolves10.2139/ssrn.4098809
The Proposal for the Artificial Intelligence Act: Considerations around Some Key Concepts
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3386914
Data Protection, Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Services: Is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) ‘Artificial Intelligence-Proof’?
resolves10.1080/09662839.2022.2101883
Digital sovereignty, geopolitical imaginaries, and the reproduction of European identity
resolves10.1007/s12027-022-00725-6
AI as a challenge for legal regulation – the scope of application of the artificial intelligence act proposal
resolves10.2139/ssrn.3897839
Damages Liability for Harm Caused by Artificial Intelligence – EU Law in Flux
resolves10.1080/17579961.2021.1898300
From a ‘race to AI’ to a ‘race to AI regulation’: regulatory competition for artificial intelligence
resolves10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105657
Regulating AI. A label to complete the proposed Act on Artificial Intelligence
resolves10.1080/13600869.2022.2060471
On the path to the future: mapping the notion of transparency in the EU regulatory framework for AI
resolves10.9785/cri-2021-220402
Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act — Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach
resolves10.1016/j.giq.2022.101685
Governance of artificial intelligence: A risk and guideline-based integrative framework
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBogucki A et al (2022) The AI Act and emerging EU Digital Acquis: overlaps, gaps and inconsistencies, CEPS In-Depth Analysis. https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/the-ai-act-and-emerging-eu-digital-acquis/
no DOI — not checkedDunn P, De Gregorio G (2022) The ambiguous risk-based approach of the artificial intelligence act: links and discrepancies with other union strategies. IAIL 2022 Imagining the AI Landscape after the AI Act. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3221/IAIL_paper7.pdf
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2020) ‘White Paper On Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust’, COM(2020) 65 final
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2021) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Better regulation: Joining forces to make better law’ COM(2021) 219 final
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2021) Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment accompanying the document 'Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety, amending Regulation
no DOI — not checked(EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Directive 87/357/EEC and Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council', SWD(2021) 168 final
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2022) Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act), SWD(2022) 34 final
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (2022) Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on adapting non-contractual civil liability rules to artificial intelligence, COM(2022) 496 final
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Data Protection Board (2021) EDPB-EDPS Joint Opinion 03/2021 on the Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European data governance (Data Governance Act)
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Parliament Research Service (2022) Briefing, October 2022, ‘The Data Act’ https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733681/EPRS_BRI(2022)733681_EN.pdf
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Parliament Research Service (2023) Briefing of 08 February 2023, General Product Safety Regulation. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2021)698028
no DOI — not checkedFederal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) (2019) Project GAIA-X. A Federated Data Infrastructure as the Cradle of a Vibrant European Ecosystem
no DOI — not checkedFeiler L et al (2018) The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): a commentary. Globe Law & Business
no DOI — not checkedGellert R (2021) The role of the risk-based approach in the General Data Protection Regulation and in the European Commission’s proposed Artificial Intelligence Act: business as usual? J Ethics Leg Technol 3(2):15–33. https://jelt.padovauniversitypress.it/2021/2/2
no DOI — not checkedHaeck P (2023) Europe’s new data law, explained. Politico, 28 June 2023. https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-new-data-act-explained/
no DOI — not checkedKolt N (2023) Algorithmic Black Swans. Wash Univ Law Rev 101, forthcoming. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4370566
no DOI — not checkedKop M (2021) EU Artificial Intelligence Act: The European Approach to AI. Stanford – Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments, Stanford University, Issue No. 2/2021. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/eu-artificial-intelligence-act-the-european-approach-to-ai/
no DOI — not checkedLeistner M, Antoine L (2022) Attention, here comes the EU Data Act! Critical in-depth analysis of the Commission’s 2022 Proposal. J Intellect Prop Inf Technol Electron Commerce Law 13(3):339–349
no DOI — not checkedMacCarthy M, Propp K (2021) Machines learn that Brussels writes the rules: the EU’s new AI regulation. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2021/05/04/machines-learn-that-brussels-writes-the-rules-the-eus-new-ai-regulation/
no DOI — not checkedMadiega T (2020) Digital sovereignty for Europe. EPRS Ideas Paper Towards a more resilient EU
no DOI — not checkedPouget H (2023) The EU’s AI act is barreling toward AI standards that do not exist. Lawfare, January 12, 2023. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/eus-ai-act-barreling-toward-ai-standards-do-not-exist
no DOI — not checkedRühlig T (2022) The rise of tech standards foreign policy, German Council on Foreign Relations Online Commentary, 03 February 2022. https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/rise-tech-standards-foreign-policy
no DOI — not checkedSartor G, Lagioia F (2020) The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence. European Parliamentary Research Service Study. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2020)641530
no DOI — not checkedTurton F (2016) Shifting the burden of consent under the GDPR. Online, Society for Computers and Law, 18 February 2016. https://www.scl.org/articles/3598-shifting-the-burden-of-consent-under-the-gdpr
no DOI — not checkedVolpicelli G (2023) ChatGPT broke the EU plan to regulate AI. Politico (Online 3 March 2023). https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-plan-regulate-chatgpt-openai-artificial-intelligence-act/
no DOI — not checkedWheeler T (2023) The three challenges of AI regulation. Commentary. Brookings. Online, 15 June 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-three-challenges-of-ai-regulation/
no DOI — not checkedZarsky TZ (2017) Incompatible: the GDPR in the age of big data. Seton Hall Law Rev 47(4(2)):995–1020. https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1606&context=shlr
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. If Crossref’s record marks the work itself
retracted, withdrawn, or removed, the badge says so instead of showing clean. It says nothing
about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references
deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-11 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/16495_2023_64"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/16495_2023_64/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/16495_2023_64)