Reference health

ASA Statement on Statistical Significance and p-Values

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_1
CiteStamped reference-health badge
7/7 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

4 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 7 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1511/2014.111.460
The Statistical Crisis in Science
resolves10.1214/13-AOS1123
Uniformly most powerful Bayesian tests
resolves10.1080/2330443X.2014.956906
ASA Statement on Value-Added Models
resolves10.1038/506150a
Scientific method: Statistical errors
resolves10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00827.x
The Reproducibility Crisis in Science: A Statistical Counterattack
resolves10.1002/scin.5591770721
Odds are, it's wrong: Science fails to face the shortcomings of statistics
The 4 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Statistical Association. (2010). ASA statement on risk – Limiting post election audits.” Available at http://www.amstat.org/policy/pdfs/Risk-Limiting_Endorsement.pdf. [129].
no DOI — not checkedLeek, J. (2014). On the scalability of statistical procedures: Why the p-value bashers just don’t get it. Simply Statistics Blog. Available at http://simplystatistics.org/2014/02/14/on-the-scalability-of-statisticalprocedures-why-the-p-value-bashers-just-dont-get-it/. [129].
no DOI — not checkedPhys.org Science News Wire. (2013). The problem with p values: How significant are they, really? Available at http://phys.org/wire-news/145707973/the-problem-with-p-values-how-significant-are-they-really.html. [129].
no DOI — not checkedSiegfried, T. (2014). To make science better, watch out for statistical flaws. Science News Context Blog, February, 7, 2014. Available at https://www.sciencenews.org/blog/context/make-science-betterwatch-out-statistical-flaws. [129].
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_1/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_1)