Reference health
Destructive Technologies for Industrial and Corporate Change
5 of 34 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-03
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1430/87140
does not resolve to a known work10.23760/2499-6661.2018.001
does not resolve to a known work10.1453/jeb.v5i1.1578
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.2003.9416161
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1996.9704071866
The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/smj.246
When are technologies disruptive? a demand‐based view of the emergence of competition
resolves10.1504/IJTTC.2005.006699
Metrics to measure the technology transfer absorption: analysis of the relationship between institutes and adopters in northern Italy
resolves10.1504/IJHTM.2012.050616
Converging genetics, genomics and nanotechnologies for groundbreaking pathways in biomedicine and nanomedicine
resolves10.1080/09537325.2014.882501
Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: the effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change
resolves10.1504/IJKL.2015.071052
Technological paradigms and trajectories as determinants of the R&D corporate change in drug discovery industry
resolves10.1016/j.jeca.2016.06.001
The relation between price setting in markets and asymmetries of systems of measurement of goods
resolves10.1007/s10961-017-9572-1
Optimization in R&D intensity and tax on corporate profits for supporting labor productivity of nations
resolves10.1080/09537325.2018.1523385
A theory of classification and evolution of technologies within a Generalised Darwinism
resolves10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101198
Deep learning technology for improving cancer care in society: New directions in cancer imaging driven by artificial intelligence
resolves10.1504/IJBNN.2012.051223
Emerging nanotechnological research for future pathways of biomedicine
resolves10.1504/IJBET.2013.055665
New technological trajectories of non-thermal plasma technology in medicine
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.007
Path-breaking directions of nanotechnology-based chemotherapy and molecular cancer therapy
resolves10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.11.003
A theory of the evolution of technology: Technological parasitism and the implications for innovation magement
resolves10.1007/s10961-011-9219-6
Current trends in nanotechnology research across worldwide geo-economic players
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5885.2005.00175.x
The Innovator's Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S
UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdner R, Zemsky P (2005) Disruptive technologies and the emergence of competition. RAND J Econ 36(2 (Summer)):229–254
no DOI — not checkedCalvano E (2007) Destructive creation. SSE/EFI working paper series in economics and finance, no 653, December
no DOI — not checkedChristensen C (1997) The Innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
no DOI — not checkedChristensen C, Raynor M (2003) The Innovator’s solution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
no DOI — not checkedChristensen C, Raynor M, McDonald R (2015) What is disruptive innovation? Harv Bus Rev December:44–53
no DOI — not checkedCoccia M (2019b) Killer technologies: the destructive creation in the technical change. ArXiv.org e-print archive. Cornell University. Permanent arXiv available at
http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.12406
no DOI — not checkedFreeman C (1974) The economics of industrial innovation. Penguin, Harmondsworth
no DOI — not checkedGarud R, Simpson B, Langley A, Tsoukas H (eds) (2015) The emergence of novelty in organizations. Oxford University Press, Oxford
no DOI — not checkedPorter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. Free Press, New York
no DOI — not checkedSahal D (1981) Patterns of technological innovation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading
no DOI — not checkedUtterback JM, Pistorius C, Yilmaz E (2019) The dynamics of competition and of the diffusion of innovations. MIT Sloan school working paper 5519-18. Last revised February 20, 2019
no DOI — not checkedWalker HB (1929) Engineering applied to agriculture. Agric Eng 10:341–349
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1)