Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 28 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedThe UK Cards Association, http://www.financialfraudaction.org.uk/cms/assets/1/be%20card%20smart%20release%20final%20-%2024%20nov%2011%20(nfa).pdf
no DOI — not checkedFinancial Fraud Action UK, http://www.financialfraudaction.org.uk/cms/assets/1/fraud%20figures%20release%2010%20mar%2010.pdf
no DOI — not checkedDirectGov, UK, http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Consumerrights/Howtocomplainaboutgoodsandservices/DG_196229
no DOI — not checkedPublicservice.co.uk, http://www.publicservice.co.uk/news_story.asp?id=18293
no DOI — not checkedMail Online, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2073344/Will-fall-Santa-frauds-Britain-flooded-designer-Christmas-gifts-actually-dangerous-fakes.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
no DOI — not checkedRetail Digital, http://www.retail-digital.com/consumer_trends/top-retail-scams
no DOI — not checkedBBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8392600.stm
no DOI — not checkedUK Cards Association, http://www.theukcardsassociation.org.uk/media_centre/press_releases_new/-/page/1323/
no DOI — not checkedhttp://www.internetretailer.com/2011/01/18/fraud-losses-fall
no DOI — not checkedHu, X.R., Lin, Z.X., Zhang, H.: Myth or reality: effect of trust promoting seals in electronic markets. In: Proceeding of the Eleventh Annual Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems (WITS), New Orleans, Louisiana, pp. 65–70 (2001)
no DOI — not checkedKimery, K.M., McCard, M.: Third-party assurances: mapping the road to trust in e-retailing. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 4(2), 63–82 (2002)
no DOI — not checkedNielsen, J., Molich, R., Snyder, S., Farrell, C.: E-Commerce User Experience:Trust. Nielsen Norman Group, Fremont (2000)
no DOI — not checkedBolton, G.E., Katok, E., Ockenfels, A.: How Effective Are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Investigation. Manage. Sci. 50(11), 1587–1602 (2004)
no DOI — not checkedHandy, C.: Trust and the Virtual Organization. Harvard Business Review 73(3), 40–50 (1995)
no DOI — not checkedBacharach, M., Gambetta, D.: Trust as Type Detection. In: Castelfranchi, C., Tan, Y. (eds.) Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies, pp. 1–26. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)
no DOI — not checkedEgger, F.N.: Affective Design of E-Commerce User Interfaces: How to maximise perceived trustworthiness. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, pp. 317–324 (2001)
no DOI — not checkedGoogle Good to Know, http://www.google.co.uk/goodtoknow/online-safety/shopping/
no DOI — not checkedStay Safe, http://www.staysafeonline.org/
no DOI — not checkedDirectGov UK, http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_180506
no DOI — not checkedDirectGov UK, http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Consumerrights/Protectyourselffromscams/DG_195960
no DOI — not checkedAction Fraud, UK, http://www.actionfraud.org.uk/festival-lovers-must-beware-of-ticketing-fraud-mar11
no DOI — not checkedStrauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE publications, London (1998)
no DOI — not checkedVerisign: Report Seal Misuse, https://www.verisign.com/support/contact/seal-abuse/index.html
no DOI — not checkedTRUSTe, http://www.truste.com/consumer-privacy/comparing-web-privacy-seals
no DOI — not checkedWhitten, A., Tygar, J.D.: Why Johnny can’t encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium (SSYM 1999), vol. 8, p. 14. USENIX Association, Berkeley (1999)
no DOI — not checkedGHD Repair, http://www.ghd-repair.co.uk/fake_ghds.html
no DOI — not checkedEbay, http://pages.ebay.com/help/account/securing-account.html
no DOI — not checkedSOLID Authentication, https://www.solidauthentication.com
checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.