At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAde, F. (2006). Decision making in Europe: Were Spain and Poland right to stop the constitution in December 2003? (Preprint 2006), from
http://congress.utu.fi/epcs2006/docs/D3_ade.pdf
no DOI — not checkedAndjiga, N.-G., Chantreuil, F., & Leppeley, D. (2003). La mesure du pouvoir de vote. Mathematical Social Sciences, 163, 111–145.
no DOI — not checkedBaldwin, R. E., & Widgrén, M. (2004). Winners and losers under various dual majority rules for the EU Council of Ministers. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4450, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels 2004, from
http://www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP4450.asp
no DOI — not checkedBanzhaf, J. F. (1965). Weighted voting does not work: A mathematical analysis. Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317–343.
no DOI — not checkedHosli, M. O. (2008). Council decision rules and European Union constitutional design. AUCO Czech Economic Review, 2, 76–96.
no DOI — not checkedKirsch, W., Słomczyński, W., & Życzkowski, K. (2007). Getting the votes right. European Voice, 3–9, 12.
no DOI — not checkedKirsch, W. (2007). On Penrose’s square-root law and beyond. Homo Oeconomicus, 24, 357–380.
no DOI — not checkedKirsch, W. (2010). The distribution of power in the Council of Ministers of the European Union. In M. Cichocki & K. Życzkowski (Eds.), Institutional design and voting power in the European Union (pp. 93–107). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group.
no DOI — not checkedKurth, M. (2007). Square root voting in the Council of the European Union: Rounding effects and the jagiellonian compromise, (Preprint math.GM 0712.2699).
no DOI — not checkedLeech, D., & Machover, M. (2003). Qualified majority voting: The effect of the quota. In M. Holler, et al. (Eds.), European Governance, Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie (pp. 127–143). Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen.
no DOI — not checkedLeech, D., & Aziz, H. (2010). The double majority voting rule of the EU reform treaty as a democratic ideal for an enlarging union: An appraisal using voting power analysis. In M. Cichocki & K. Życzkowski (Eds.), Institutional design and voting power in the European Union (pp. 59–73). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group.
no DOI — not checkedMachover, M. (2010). Penrose’s square root rule and the EU Council of the Ministers: Significance of the quota. In M. Cichocki & K. Życzkowski (Eds.), Institutional design and voting power in the European Union (pp. 35–42). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group.
no DOI — not checkedMoberg, A. (2010). Is the double majority really double? The voting rules in the Lisbon Treaty. In M. Cichocki & K. Życzkowski (Eds.), Institutional design and voting power in the European Union (pp. 19–34). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group.
no DOI — not checkedMorriss, P. (1987) Power: A philosophical analysis (2nd ed. 2002). Manchester UP: Manchester.
no DOI — not checkedPenrose, L. S. (1952). On the objective study of crowd behaviour. London: H.K. Lewis & Co.
no DOI — not checkedPöppe, Ch. Die Quadratwurzel, das Irrationale und der Tod, Spektrum der Wissenschaft, August 2007, pp. 102–105.
no DOI — not checkedPukelsheim, F. (2007). Der Jagiellonische Kompromiss. Neue Züricher Zeitung, 20 Juni 2007.
no DOI — not checkedPukelsheim, F. (2010). Putting citizens first: Representation and power in the European Union in institutional design and voting power in the European Union. In M. Cichocki, & K. Życzkowski (Eds.), (pp. 235–253). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group
no DOI — not checkedSłomczyński, W., & Życzkowski, K. (2004) Voting in the European Union: The square root system of penrose and a critical point. preprint cond-mat.0405396.
no DOI — not checkedSłomczyński, W., & Życzkowski, K. (2006). Penrose voting system and optimal quota. Acta Physica Polonica B, 37, 3133–3143.
no DOI — not checkedSłomczyński, W., & Życzkowski, K. (2007). From a toy model to the double square root voting system. Homo Oeconomicus, 24, 381–399.
no DOI — not checkedSłomczyński, W., & Życzkowski, K. (2010). Jagiellonian compromise—an alternative voting system for the Council of the European Union. In M. Cichocki & K. Życzkowski (Eds.), Institutional design and voting power in the European Union (pp. 43–57). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Group.
checked 2026-08-07 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.