Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 36 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAbbott B (1886) The patent laws of all nations, vol 1 (Algeria-Turkey). Brodix, Washington
no DOI — not checkedALEX Historische Rechts- und Gesetzestexte Online/Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Kaiserliches Patent vom 31. März 1832. http://alex.onb.ac.at/cgi-content/alex?aid=jgs&datum=1019&page=14&size=45. Accessed 7 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedBBC News Technology (21 December 2012) EU accuses Samsung of patent abuse in Apple Lawsuits. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20812871. Accessed 4 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedBently L, Sherman B (2009) Intellectual property law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
no DOI — not checkedBodenhausen G (1968) Guide to the application of the Paris Convention for the protection of industrial property as revised at Stockholm in 1967. BIRPI, Geneva
no DOI — not checkedChalmers R (2007) Evergreen or deciduous? Australian trends in relation to the ‘evergreening’ of patents. Melbourne Univ Law Rev 30:29–61
no DOI — not checkedChien C (2009) Of Trolls, Davids, Goliaths, and Kings: narratives and evidence in the litigation of high-tech patents. N C Law Rev 87:1571–1615
no DOI — not checkedCotter T (2011) Four questionable rationales for the patent misuse doctrine. Minn J Law Sci Technol 12:457–489
no DOI — not checkedDarrow J (2010) Debunking the “Evergreening” patents Myth. Harv Law Rec 6:131–133
no DOI — not checkedDifferencebetween.net, Difference between abuse and misuse. www.differencebetween.net/language/difference-between-abuse-and-misuse. Accessed 6 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedElrefaie E (2010) Injunctive relief post eBay and the various applications of the four-factor test in differing technological industries. Hastings Sci Technol Law J 2:219–242
no DOI — not checkedFeldmann R (2003) The insufficiency of antitrust analysis for patent misuse. Hastings Law J 55:399–449
no DOI — not checkedGordon G, Hoerner R (2000) Overview and historical development of the misuse doctrine. In: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, intellectual property misuse: licensing and litigation. American Bar Association, Chicago, pp 1–35
no DOI — not checkedHeinemann A (2002) Immaterialgüterschutz in der Wettbewerbsordnung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
no DOI — not checkedHilty R (2012) Keynote. In: Liu K, Hilty R (eds) The enforcement of patents. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 9–31
no DOI — not checkedHoeren T, Herring E (2011) WikiLeaks und das Erstveröffentlichungsrecht des Urhebers. Informationsfreiheit als externe Schranke des Urheberrechts? MMR 500–504
no DOI — not checkedKanter J (6 May 2013) New York Times: Europe rules against patent move by Google’s Motorola Unit. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/07/technology/07iht-google07.html?_r=0. Accessed 9 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedKöhler H (1996) Die Begrenzung wettbewerblicher Ansprüche durch den Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit. GRUR 82–92
no DOI — not checkedKraßer R (2009) Patentrecht, 6th edn. Beck, München
no DOI — not checkedLemley M, Moore K (2004) Ending abuse of patent continuations. Boston Univ Law Rev 84:63–118
no DOI — not checkedLemley M, Shapiro C (2007) Patent holdup and royalty stacking. Tex Law Rev 85:1991–2049
no DOI — not checkedLiu Y (2011) Patenting business methods in the United States and Beyond – globalization of intellectual property protection is not always an easy game to play. Int Rev Intellect Prop Comp Law 42:395–416
no DOI — not checkedMoynihan C (4 July 2005) New York Times: He says he owns the word ‘Stealth’ (actually, he claims ‘Chutzpah,’ too). http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/04/business/04stealth.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Accessed 4 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedMueller J, Chisum D (2008) Enabling patent law’s inherent anticipation doctrine. University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-19, pp 1102–1164
no DOI — not checkedO’Melinn L (2008) Effects of eBay: discretion, statutory damages, and private attorneys-general. Akron Intellect Prop J 2:119–132
no DOI — not checkedOhly A (2008) “Patenttrolle” oder: Der patentrechtliche Unterlassungsanspruch unter Verhältnismäßigkeitsvorbehalt? Aktuelle Entwicklung im US-Patentrecht und ihre Bedeutung für das deutsche und europäische Patentsystem. GRUR Int 787–798
no DOI — not checkedOhly A (2009) Three principles of European IP enforcement law: Effectiveness, proportionality, dissuasiveness. In: Drexl J, Hilty R, Boy L, Godt C, Remiche B (eds) Technology and competition. Contributions in honour of Hanns Ullrich. Larcier, Brussels, pp 257–275
no DOI — not checkedPetersen B (2008) Injunctive relief in the post-eBay world. Berkeley Technol Law J 23:193–218
no DOI — not checkedPflüger M (2011) In: Cottier T, Véron P (eds) Concise international and European IP law, 2nd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 191–210
no DOI — not checkedPflüger M, Prüfer-Kruse T (2011) In: Cottier T, Véron P (eds) Concise international and European IP law, 2nd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 210–241
no DOI — not checkedPhillips J (2009) eBay’s effect on copyright injunctions: when property rules give way to liability rules. Berkeley Technol Law J 24:405–435
no DOI — not checkedRoberts J (8 June 2012) Washington Post: Famous judge spikes Apple-Google case, calls patent system ‘dysfunctional’. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/famous-judge-spikes-apple-google-case-calls-patent-system-dysfunctional/2012/06/08/gJQAM1bQOV_story.html. Accessed 2 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedTrimble M (2012) Injunctive relief, equity, and misuse of rights in U.S. patent law. GRUR Int 514–522
no DOI — not checkedvon Kleinschrod C (1855) Die international Patentgesetzgebung nach ihren Prinzipien nebst Vorschlägen für ein künftiges gemeines deutsches Patentrecht. Enke, Erlangen
no DOI — not checkedvon Mühlendahl A (2007) Enforcement of intellectual property rights – is injunctive relief mandatory? Int Rev Intellect Prop Comp Law 38:377–380
no DOI — not checkedWalter M, Goebel D (2010) In: Walter M, von Lewinski S (eds) European copyright law. A commentary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1193–1364
checked 2026-07-24 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.