Reference health
University–Community Engagement in the Wider Policy Environment
1 of 9 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-25
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
30 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/hemp-22-5km32wkjhf24
The 8 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/09654310500107175
University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice
resolves10.1007/BF01287739
Analyzing university student contribution to the economic base of the community
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00202.x
Steering at a Distance: A New Paradigm of Public Governance in Dutch Higher Education
resolves10.1080/13583883.2005.9967136
The government‐higher education institution relationship: Theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory
resolves10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00100-6
The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980
The 30 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedARC. (2002). National survey of research commercialization. Canberra: Australian Research Council.
no DOI — not checkedAssociation of University Technology Managers. (2009). Innovations from academic research that positively impact global health: Better world report 2009. Deerfield: AUTM.
no DOI — not checkedAustralian Government. (2009). Mission based compacts for universities: A framework for discussion. Canberra: Department for Education, Employment & Workplace Relations, and Department for Innovation, Industry, Science & Research.
no DOI — not checkedAUTM. (2003). AUTM licensing survey: FY 2001. Northbrook: Association of University Technology Managers.
no DOI — not checkedAUTM. (2007). FY 2005: AUTM US licensing survey: A survey of technology licensing (and related) performance for U.S. academic and nonprofit institutions and technology investment firms. Northbrook: Association of University Technology Transfer Managers.
no DOI — not checkedCentre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). (1982). The university and the community: The problems of changing relationships. Paris: OECD.
no DOI — not checkedCharles, D. R., & Benneworth, P. S. (1999). Evaluation of the Edinburgh University commercialisation strategy. Report to Edinburgh Research & Innovation. Edinburgh: ERI.
no DOI — not checkedCharles, D. R., & Benneworth, P. S. (2001). The regional contribution of higher education. London: HEFCE/Universities UK.
no DOI — not checkedClark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon/IAU Press.
no DOI — not checkedDaalder, H. (1982). The sudden revolution and the sluggish aftermath: A retrospective since 1968. In H. Daalder & E. Shils (Eds.), Universities, politicians and bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedDassen, A. (2010). Networks: Structure and action: Steering in and steering by policy networks. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
no DOI — not checkedDassen, A., & Benneworth, P. (2011). Understanding the limits to HE policy networks. In H. de Boer, J. Enders, & D. Westerheijden (Eds.), The reform of higher education in Europe. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
no DOI — not checkedDebackere, K., & De Bondt, R. (Eds.). (2002). Leuven research and development: 30 years of breakthroughs and innovations towards an entrepreneurial university. Leuven: KUL Press.
no DOI — not checkedDepartment of Trade and Industry (DTI). (2000). Excellence and opportunity—A science and technology policy for the 21st century. London: The Stationary Office.
no DOI — not checkedDelanty, G. (2002). The university and modernity: A history of the present. In K. Robins & F. Webster (Eds.), The virtual university: Knowledge, markets and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedDIUS. (2010). Higher education at work: High skills: High value. London: Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/tna/+/http://www.dius.gov.uk/consultations/documents/Higher_Education_at_Work.pdf/. Accessed 11 Nov. 2010.
no DOI — not checkedDuczmal, W. (2006). The rise of private higher education in Poland. Policies, markets and strategies. Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
no DOI — not checkedEdinburgh Research & Innovation (ERI). (1999). A commercialisation strategy for Edinburgh University. Edinburgh: ERI.
no DOI — not checkedEdye, D., & Lintner, V. (1996). Contemporary Europe, Hemel. Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
no DOI — not checkedFlorax, R. J. G. M. (1992). The university: A regional booster? Economic impacts of academic knowledge infrastructure. Aldershot: Avebury.
no DOI — not checkedGummett, P. (2009). Effective policies for university-community engagement. Paper presented to HEIs’ Impact Initiative Symposium on excellence in engagement: Policies and practices for university-community engagement, KITE, Newcastle University, Newcastle.
no DOI — not checkedHEFCE. (2004). Higher education business and community engagement survey 2003-04, notes for guidance. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
no DOI — not checkedHEFCE. (2009). Research excellence framework: Second consultation on the assessment and funding of research HEFCE Circular 2009/38. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
no DOI — not checkedKroonenberg, H. H. van den (1996). Ondernemen met kennis (Knowledge-based enterprise). Enschede: University of Twente Press.
no DOI — not checkedMcGregor, P., Hermannsonn, K., Lisenkova, K., & Swales, K. (2009). The overall impact of Scottish HEIs on the economy of Scotland. Paper presented to Making an Impact: Universities and the Regional Economy, London, 4th November 2009.
no DOI — not checkedMcNicoll, I. H. (COSHEP). (1995). The impact of the Scottish higher education sector on the economy of Scotland. Glasgow: Committee of Scottish Higher Education Principals.
no DOI — not checkedPotts, G. (1998). Towards the embedded University. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
no DOI — not checkedReich, R. (1991). The work of nations. London: Simon & Schuster.
no DOI — not checkedRhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
no DOI — not checkedUNICO. (2002). Annual UNICO-NUBS survey of university commercialisation activity. Nottingham: Nottingham Business School.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-007-4875-0_12"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-007-4875-0_12/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-007-4875-0_12)