Reference health
Evaluation of Existing Fragility Curves
1 of 38 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-10
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
52 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.2788/19605
The 37 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004
Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits
resolves10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.11.003
Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation
resolves10.1193/1.1586027
2. Statistical Analysis of Bridge Damage Data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, Earthquake
resolves10.1193/1.4000089
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Multi‐Span Continuous Highway Bridge Fitted with Shape Memory Alloy Bars and Laminated Rubber Bearings
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.002
Comparing vector-valued intensity measures for fragility analysis of steel frames in the case of narrow-band ground motions
resolves10.1080/15583050701828178
Simplified Pushover-Based Earthquake Loss Assessment (SP-BELA) Method for Masonry Buildings
resolves10.1007/s10518-011-9249-3
Seismic analysis of deep tunnels in near fault conditions: a case study in Southern Italy
resolves10.1007/s10518-005-1239-x
Force and Displacement Based Vulnerability Assessment for Traditional Buildings
resolves10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.001
Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment
resolves10.2495/RISK120301
Empirical fragility assessment after the January 12, 2010 Haiti earthquake
resolves10.1193/1.3606398
Developing Empirical Collapse Fragility Functions for Global Building Types
resolves10.3130/jaabe.11.153
Seismic Fragility Assessment of RC Moment-Resisting Frames Designed According to the Current Chinese Seismic Design Code
resolves10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0
A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings
resolves10.1007/s10518-010-9231-5
Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the August 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, Earthquake
resolves10.1007/s00024-010-0155-4
Uncertainty Analysis and Expert Judgment in Seismic Hazard Analysis
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000047
Vulnerability of Reinforced-Concrete-Frame Buildings and Their Occupants in the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, Earthquake
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.024
Fragility curves for expressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan
resolves10.1002/eqe.655
Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach
resolves10.1193/1.1586053
A Model for Buildings' Vulnerability Assessment Using the Parameterless Scale of Seismic Intensity (PSI)
resolves10.1596/1813-9450-3201
A Literature Review on the Use of Expert Opinion in Probabilistic Risk Analysis
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete
resolves10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9
Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.002
A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.010
Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves
resolves10.1193/1.3652744
Logic Tree Branch Weights and Probabilities: Summing up to One is not Enough
resolves10.1002/eqe.746
Computational and rapid expected annual loss estimation methodologies for structures
resolves10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.012
System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrix-based system reliability method
resolves10.1533/9780857098986.1.29
Uncertainties in ground motion prediction in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) of civil infrastructure
resolves10.1533/9780857098986.3.307
Assessing seismic risks for new and existing buildings using performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodology
The 52 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: Part 1 – Guidelines. American Lifelines Alliance, ASCE-FEMA
no DOI — not checkedAmiri GG, Jalalian M, Amrei SAR (2007) Derivation of vulnerability functions based on observational data for Iran. In: Proceedings of international symposium on innovation and sustainability of structures in civil engineering, Tongji University, China
no DOI — not checkedAnagnos T (1999) Development of an electrical substation equipment performance database for evaluation of equipment fragilities. PG&E/PEER report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA
no DOI — not checkedAntonio S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5):643–661
no DOI — not checkedApplied Technology Council (1985) ATC-13, Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, CA, 492 pp
no DOI — not checkedApplied Technology Council (ATC) (2007) Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters. ATC-63 90% Draft, Redwood City, CA
no DOI — not checkedApplied Technology Council (ATC) (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, vol 1 – Methodology. ATC-58, Redwood City, CA
no DOI — not checkedAslani H, Miranda E (2004) Component-level and system-level sensitivity study for earthquake loss estimation. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, BC, Canada
no DOI — not checkedAspinall W, Cooke RM (1998) Expert judgement and the Montserrat volcano eruption. In: Mosleh A, Bari RA (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management PSAM4, New York, USA, 13–18 Sept 1998
no DOI — not checkedBaker J (2011) Fitting fragility functions to structural analysis data using maximum likelihood estimation, Working paper –PEER
no DOI — not checkedBaker JW, Cornell CA (2003) Uncertainty specification and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM methods. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, CA, pp 1–8
no DOI — not checkedBakhshi A, Karimi K (2006) Method of developing fragility curves a case study for seismic assessment of masonry buildings in Iran. In: 7th international Congress in civil engineering, Tehran, Iran
no DOI — not checkedBensi M, Der Kiureghian A, Straub D (2011) A Bayesian network methodology for infrastructure seismic risk assessment and decision support, PEER report 2011/2, March 2011
no DOI — not checkedBraga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: a statistical study of damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale, Report, Rome, Italy
no DOI — not checkedBrzev S, Scawthorn C, Charleson A, Jaiswal K (2012) GEM basic building taxonomy, version 1.0, GEM ontology and taxonomy global component project. Available from http://www.nexus.globalquakemodel.org/gem-ontology-taxonomy/posts/updated-gem-basic-building-taxonomy-v1.0
no DOI — not checkedClemen RT, Winkler RL (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 19(2):187–203
no DOI — not checkedCooke RM (2001) EXCALIBUR-Windows version of EXCALIBUR: software for performance based combination of expert judgements. Department of Mathematics, Delft University of Technology. Website: http://delta.am.eqi.tudelft.nl/risk/
no DOI — not checkedCornell CA, Krawinkler H (2000) Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 3(2): Spring
no DOI — not checkedD’Ayala D, Meslem A (2013) Guide for Selection of existing analytical fragility curves and compilation of the database. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy
no DOI — not checkedD’Ayala D, Jaiswal K, Wald DJ, Porter K, Greene M (2010) Collaborative effort to estimate collapse fragility for buildings worldwide: the WHE-PAGER project. In: Proceedings of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering structure: reaching beyond borders
no DOI — not checkedDalkey N (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. A report prepared for United States Air Force Project Rand RM-5888-PR, 79 pp
no DOI — not checkedDemircioglu MB, Erdik M, Hancilar U, Sesetyan K, Tuzun C, Yenidogan C, Zulfikar AC (2010) Technical manual– earthquake loss estimation routine ELER-v3.0, Department of Earthquake Engineering Structure, Bogazici University, Istanbul, 133 pp
no DOI — not checkedElnashai AS, Borzi B, Vlachos S (2004) Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges. Struct Eng 17(2):215–244
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Committee of Standardization (CEN) (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, ENV 1998-3, Brussels, Belgium
no DOI — not checkedFEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC
no DOI — not checkedFEMA 356 (2000) Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report no 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston Virginia, USA
no DOI — not checkedGiovinazzi S, King A (2009) Estimating seismic impacts on lifelines: an international review for RiskScape. In: Proceedings of the 2009 NZSEE conference, Christchurch, New Zealand
no DOI — not checkedGrunthal G (ed) (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahier du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie, vol 15. Luxemburg
no DOI — not checkedGűlkan P, Sucuoğlu H, Ergűnay O (1992) Earthquake vulnerability, loss and risk assessment in Turkey. In: Proceedings of 11th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Madrid, Spain
no DOI — not checkedHwang H, Liu JB, Chiu Y-H (2001) Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges, MAEC report: project MAEC RR-4. Mid-America Earthquake Center, Urbana-Champaign
no DOI — not checkedIoannou I, Rossetto T (2013) Sensitivity of empirical fragility assessment of buildings to the misclassification error of damage. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on structural safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2013), Columbia University, New York, USA, 16–20 June 2013
no DOI — not checkedIoannou I, Rossetto T, Damian GN (2012) Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 September
no DOI — not checkedJaiswal KS, Aspinall WP, Perkins D, Wald D, Porter KA (2012) Use of expert judgement elicitation to estimate seismic vulnerability of selected building types. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Lisbon, Portugal, 24–28 Sept 2012
no DOI — not checkedKlügel J-U (2005) On the use of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis as an input for seismic PSA. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMiRT18), Beijing, China, 7–12 Aug 2005. PaperKM02_2
no DOI — not checkedMoehle J, Deierlein G (2004) A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering structure. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, BC, Paper No. 679
no DOI — not checkedMolina S, Lang DH, Lindholm CD (2009) User and technical manual, SELENA v4.0, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway, 85 pp
no DOI — not checkedPagnini L, Vicente R, Lagomarsimo S, Varum H (2008) A mechanical method for the vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Beijing, China
no DOI — not checkedPorter K (2011) GEM vulnerability rating system, GEM global vulnerability estimation methods consortium. Available from www.nexus.globalquakemodel.org/gem-vulnerability/posts/
no DOI — not checkedRajeev P, Tesfamariam S (2011) Effect of construction quality variability on seismic fragility of reinforced concrete building. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–16 April
no DOI — not checkedRossetto T (2004) Vulnerability curves for the seismic assessment of reinforced concrete structure populations. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London, UK
no DOI — not checkedRossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013a) Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships: compendium and guide for selection. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, April 2013, pp 62
no DOI — not checkedRossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013b) Guidelines for the construction of empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy
no DOI — not checkedSarabandi P, Pachakis D, King S, Kiremidjian A (2004) Empirical fragility functions from recent earthquakes In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, Canada
no DOI — not checkedScheibe M, Skutsch M, Schofer J (1975) Experiments in Delphi methodology. In: Linestone H, Turoff M (eds) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, London
no DOI — not checkedShahzada K, Gencturk B, Khan AN, Naseer A, Javed M, Fahad M (2011) Vulnerability assessment of typical buildings in Pakistan. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4:208–211
no DOI — not checkedShinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech-ASCE 126(12):1459–1467
no DOI — not checkedSinghal A, Kiremidjian AS (1997) A method for earthquake motion damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames. State University of New York at Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Structure Research Report NCEER-97-0008
no DOI — not checkedSpence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A (1992) Correlation of ground motion with building damage: The definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Balkema, Rotterdam
no DOI — not checkedSyner-G (2011) Fragility functions for common masonry building types in Europe. D3.2, University of Pavia, 177 pp
no DOI — not checkedUma SR, Ryu H, Luco N, Liel AB, Raghunandan M (2011) Comparison of main-shock and aftershock fragility curves developed for New Zealand and US buildings. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–16 April
no DOI — not checkedVacareanu R, Chesca AB, Georgescu B, Seki M (2007) Case study on the expected seismic losses of soft and weak ground floor buildings. International symposium on strong vrancea earthquake and risk mitigation, Bucharest, Romania, October
no DOI — not checkedWen YK, Ellinwood BR, Bracci J (2004) Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering, Mid-America Earthquake Center, CD Release 04-04
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_3"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_3/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_3)