Reference health

The Transferable Belief Model for Quantified Belief Representation

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_9
CiteStamped reference-health badge
24/24 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

34 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 24 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/0165-0114(87)90132-1
On the concept of possibility-probability consistency
resolves10.1214/aoms/1177698950
Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping
resolves10.1080/03081078608934937
A SET-THEORETIC VIEW OF BELIEF FUNCTIONS Logical operations and approximations by fuzzy sets†
resolves10.1007/3-540-18579-8_6
The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning
resolves10.1109/3468.487961
Representing partial ignorance
resolves10.1007/978-94-009-2863-3_12
Conditioning, Kinematics, and Exchangeability
resolves10.1090/S0002-9904-1940-07294-5
The bases of probability
resolves10.1080/03081079008935126
SPECIALIZATION—A NEW CONCEPT FOR UNCERTAINTY HANDLING WITH BELIEF FUNCTIONS
resolves10.1016/0888-613X(92)90009-O
Uncertainty measures for evidential reasoning I: A review
resolves10.1515/9780691214696
A Mathematical Theory of Evidence
resolves10.1016/0888-613X(92)90035-X
Rejoinders to comments on “perspectives on the theory and practice of belief functions”
resolves10.1207/s15516709cog0903_2
Languages and Designs for Probability Judgment*
resolves10.1016/0165-0114(81)90054-3
Medical diagnosis: Fuzzy sets and degrees of belief
resolves10.1016/S0020-7373(83)80040-6
Information content of an evidence
resolves10.1109/34.55104
The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model
resolves10.1002/int.4550070106
The transferable belief model and random sets
resolves10.1016/0951-8320(92)90105-T
The transferable belief model for expert judgements and reliability problems
resolves10.1016/0888-613X(93)90005-X
Belief functions: The disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem
resolves10.1016/S0004-3702(96)00054-9
The normative representation of quantified beliefs by belief functions
resolves10.1016/0004-3702(94)90026-4
The transferable belief model
resolves10.1007/978-1-4615-6245-0_12
The Transferable Belief Model for Belief Representation
resolves10.1111/j.2517-6161.1961.tb00388.x
Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision
resolves10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7
Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities
resolves10.1002/int.4550010403
The entailment principle for dempster—shafer granules
The 34 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedR. Bradley and N. Swartz. Possible worlds. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1979.
no DOI — not checkedR. Carnap. Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, 1962.
no DOI — not checkedG. Choquet. Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, Université de Grenoble, 5, 131–296, 1953.
no DOI — not checkedD. Dubois, P. Garbolino, H. E. Kyburg, H. Prade and Ph. Smets. Quantified Uncertainty. J. Applied Non-Classical Logics, 1, 105–197, 1991.
no DOI — not checkedP. O. Ekelof. RättegOang IV. Fifth edition, Stockholm, 1982.
no DOI — not checkedT. Fine. Theories of probability. Academic Press, New York, 1973.
no DOI — not checkedP. Gärdenfors, B. Hansson and N. E. Sahlin. Evidentiary value: philosophical, judicial and psychological aspects of a theory. C.W.K. Gleerups, Lund, 1983.
no DOI — not checkedP. Gärdenfors. Knowledge influx. Modelling the dynamics ofepistemic states. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1988.
no DOI — not checkedR. Giles. Foundation for a possibility theory. In Fuzzy Information and Decision Pro- cesses, M. M. Gupta and E. Sanchez, eds. pp. 183–195. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
no DOI — not checkedY.-T. Hsia. Characterizing Belief with Minimum Commitment. IJCAI-91, 1184— 1189, 1991.
no DOI — not checkedR. Kennes. Evidential Reasoning in a Categorial Perspective: Conjunction and Disjunction of Belief Functions. In Uncertainty in AI 91, b. D’Ambrosio, Ph. Smets and P. P. Bonissone, eds. pp. 174–181. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Ca, USA, 1991.
no DOI — not checkedR. Kennes. Computational aspects of the Moebius transform of a graph. IEEE- SMC, 22, 201–223, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedF. Klawonn and Ph. Smets. The dynamic of belief in the transferable belief model and specialization-generalization matrices. In Uncertainty in Al 92, D. Dubois, M. P. Wellman, B. dAmbrosio and Ph. Smets, eds. pp. 130–137. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedJ. Kohlas and P. A. Monney. A Mathematical Theory of Hints. An Approach to Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems No. 425. Springer-Verlag, 1995
no DOI — not checkedJ. Pearl. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible infernece. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988.
no DOI — not checkedE. P. Ramsey. Truth and probability. In Studies in subjective probability, H. E. Kyburg and H. E. Smolker, eds. pp. 61–92. Wiley, New york, 1931.
no DOI — not checkedE. H. Ruspini.The logical foundations of evidential reasoning. Technical note 408, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, 1986.
no DOI — not checkedL. J. Savage. Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York, 1954.
no DOI — not checkedL. S. Shapley. A value for n-person games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games, vol. 2, H. Kuhn and A.W. Tucker, eds. pp. 307–317. Princeton University Press, 1953.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. Un modèle mathématico-statistique simulant le processus du diagnostic médical. Doctoral dissertation, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, (Available through University Microfilm International, 30–32 Mortimer Street, London W1N 7RA, thesis 80–70, 003 ), 1978.
no DOI — not checkedPh Smets. Belief functions. In Non standard logics for automated reasoning, Ph. Smets, A. Mamdani, D. Dubois and H. Prade, eds. pp. 253–286. Academic Press, 1988.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. Constructing the pignistic probability function in a context of uncertainty. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5, M. Henrion, R. D. Shachter, L. N. Kanal and J. E. Lemmer, eds, pp. 29–40. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. Probability of provability and belief functions. Logique etAnalyse, 133–134, 177–195, 1991.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. The nature of the unnormalized beliefs encountered in the transferable belief model. In Uncertainty in AI 92, D. Dubois, M. P. Wellman, B. d’Ambrosio and Ph. Smets, eds. pp. 292–297. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, USA, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. The concept of distinct evidence. IPMU 92 Proceedings, pp. 789–794, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. No Dutch Book can be built against the transferable belief model even though update is not obtained by Bayes rule of conditioning. SIS, Workshop on Probabilisitic Expert Systems, R. Scozzafava, ed. pp. 181–204. Roma, 1993.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. An axiomatic justifiaction for the use of belief function to quantify beliefs. IJCAI’93 (Inter. Joint Con! on AI), San Mateo, Ca, pp. 598–603, 1993.
no DOI — not checkedPh. Smets. What is Dempster-Shafer ‘s model? In Advances in the Dempster—Shafer Theory of Evidence. R. R. Yager, J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, eds. pp. 5–34. Wiley, New York, 1994.
no DOI — not checkedP. Teller. Conditionalization and Observation. Synthesis, 26, 218- -258, 1973. [Voorbraak, 1993 ] F. Voorbraak. As Far as I Know: Epistemic Logic and Uncertainty. Dissertation, Utrecht University, 1993.
no DOI — not checkedN. Wilson. Decision making with belief functions and pignistic probabilities. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, M. Clarke, R. Kruse and S. Moral, eds. pp. 364–371. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
no DOI — not checkedS. K. M. Wong, Y. Y. Yao, P. Bollmann and H. C. Bürger. Axiomatization of qualitative belief structure. IEEE Trans. SMC, 21, 726–734, 1990.
no DOI — not checkedH. Xu. An efficient tool for reasoning with belief functions. IPMU 92 Proceedings, pp. 65–68, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedH. Xu, Y.-T. Hsia and Ph. Smets. A belief function based decision support system. Uncertainty in AI 93, D. Heckerman and A. Mamdani, eds. pp. 535–542. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993.
no DOI — not checkedH. Xu and Ph. Smets. Evidential reasoning with conditional belief functions. In Uncertainty in AI 94, D. Heckerman, D. Poole and R. Lopez de Mantaras, eds. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1994.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_9"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_9/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_9/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/978-94-017-1735-9_9)