Reference health
Markets and the measurement of value
4/4 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 4 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/BF00163530
The application of laboratory experimental economics to the contingent valuation of public goods
resolves10.2307/3439656
Experimental Tests of an Allocation Mechanism for Private, Public or Externality Goods
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCoursey, D.L., Hovis, J.J., and Schulze, W.D. (1986). On the supposed disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
no DOI — not checkedCummings, R.G., Brookshire, D.S., and Schulze, W.D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: An assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld, Publishers.
no DOI — not checkedHausman, J.A. (1981). Exact consumer's surplus and deadweight loss. American Economic Review 71: 662?676.
no DOI — not checkedSmith, V.L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review 72(5): 923?955.
no DOI — not checkedSmith, V.L., Williams, A., Bratton, K., and Vannoni, M. (1982). Competitive market institutions: Double auctions versus sealed bid-offer auctions. American Economic Review 72.
no DOI — not checkedTakayama, A. (1984). Consumer's surplus, path independence, compensating and equivalent variations. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 140: 594?625.
no DOI — not checkedWillig, R.D. (1976). Consumer's surplus without apology. American Economic Review 66(5): 89?97.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00124873"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00124873/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00124873)