Reference health
Campaign spending and Senate elections, 1978?84
18/18 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-29
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 18 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/BF00123786
Campaign contributions and voting on the cargo preference bill: A comparison of simultaneous models
resolves10.1007/BF03179665
The impact of legislator attributes on interest-group campaign contributions
resolves10.1016/0047-2727(87)90014-4
The effect of nontransferable property rights on the efficiency of political markets
resolves10.1007/BF00124028
Ceilings on campaign spending: Hypothesis and partial test with Canadian data
resolves10.2307/2111324
Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House
resolves10.1007/BF00119353
Patterns of political action committee contributions to the 1980 campaigns for the United States House of Representatives
resolves10.2307/1914093
Alternative Tests of Independence between Stochastic Regressors and Disturbances
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedFeldman, P. and Jondrow, J. (1984). Congressional elections and local federal spending. American Journal of Political Science 25: 424?439.
no DOI — not checkedGrier, K.B. and Carlson, D.M. (1988). State level economic conditions and Senate elections. Mimeo.
no DOI — not checkedHausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 26: 393?415.
no DOI — not checkedKmenta, J. (1986). Elements of econometrics. New York: McMillan Publishing.
no DOI — not checkedPindyck, R. and Rubinfeld, D. (1981). Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-29 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00138162"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00138162/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00138162)