Reference health

The importance of efficient use in the adoption of technology: A micro panel data analysis

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00156342
CiteStamped reference-health badge
18/18 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 18 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8489.1977.tb00204.x
ESTIMATION OF A PRODUCTION FRONTIER MODEL: WITH APPLICATION TO THE PASTORAL ZONE OF EASTERN AUSTRALIA
resolves10.2307/2343100
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency
resolves10.1007/978-94-015-7721-2
The Measurement of Efficiency of Production
resolves10.1086/451461
Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey
resolves10.2307/1914137
Frontier Production Functions and Technical Progress: A Study of General Milk Processing in Swedish Dairy Plants
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(80)90040-8
A survey of frontier production functions and of their relationship to efficiency measurement
resolves10.1086/452545
Induced Innovation, Green Revolution, and Income Distribution: Comment
resolves10.2307/1058325
Technical Efficiency on Individual Farms in Northwest India
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(82)90004-5
On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model
resolves10.1080/00220388508421940
Types of education and agricultural productivity: A quantitative analysis of Tamil Nadu rice farming
resolves10.2307/2232675
Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Dimensions of Productivity Change in Yugoslavia, 1965-78
resolves10.2307/2525757
Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error
resolves10.1016/0304-3878(81)90004-3
The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry
resolves10.1080/07474938608800089
Frontier production functions
resolves10.1080/07350015.1984.10509410
Production Frontiers and Panel Data
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(80)90042-1
Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation
resolves10.1086/259599
Education in Production
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBinswanger, H.P. and J.P. Quinzon. 1980. Factor and Output Market Effects of Technical Change and Public Investments Policies in Agriculture. New Haven, CT: Economic Growth Center, Discussion Paper No. 357, Yale University.
no DOI — not checkedChaudhri, D.P. 1979. Education, Innovation and Agricultural Development, London: Croom Helm.
no DOI — not checkedJamison, D.T. and L.J. Lau. 1982. Farmer Education and Efficiency, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
no DOI — not checkedJohnson, G.L. 1967. A Note on Nonconventional Inputs and Conventional Productivity Function. In C. Eicher and L. Witt (eds.) Agricultur in Economic Development, New York: McGraw-Hill.
no DOI — not checkedKalirajan, K.P. and J.C. Flinn. 1983. The Measurement of Farm Specific Technical Efficiency. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics 2: 167?180.
no DOI — not checkedProgramme Evaluation Organisation (PEO)?Australian National University (ANU). 1979. The High Yielding Varieties Programme in India, 1970?75. part II, Government of Inida Press, New Delhi.
no DOI — not checkedRao, C.R. 1965. Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedRuttan, V.W. 1977. The Green Revolution: Seven Generalizations. International Development Review 19: 16?23.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00156342"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00156342/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00156342/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00156342)