Reference health
The reverse Cellophane fallacy in market delineation
3/3 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-16
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 3 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/BF00427999
Residual demand estimation for market delineation: Complications and limitations
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBaker, Jonathan B., and Timothy F. Bresnahan (1984) ?Estimating the Elasticity of Demand Facing a Single Firm: Evidence on Three Brewing Firms?, Research Paper No. 54, Stanford Univ. Department of Economics.
no DOI — not checkedBaker, Jonathan B., and Timothy F. Bresnahan (1988) ?Estimating the Demand Curve Facing a Single Firm?, International Journal of Industrial Economics, 6, 283?300.
no DOI — not checkedHausman, Jerry A. (1983) ?Specification and Estimation of Simultaneous Equation Models?, in Zvi, Griliches and Michael D. Intrilligator, eds, Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. I, 392?448 Amsterdam: North-Holland.
no DOI — not checkedPosner, Richard A. (1976) Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective Chicago: University of Chicago.
no DOI — not checkedPosner, Richard A., and Frank H. Esterbrook (1981) Antitrust (2nd edn) St. Paul: West.
no DOI — not checkedStocking, George W., and Willard F. Mueller (1955) ?The Cellophane Case and the New Competition?, American Economic Review, 45, 29?63.
no DOI — not checkedWerden, Gregory J. (1985a) ?A Closer Analysis of Antitrust Markets?, Washington University Law quarterly, 62, 647?69.
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Department of Justice (1984) Merger Guidelines, June 14.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-16 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00158143"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00158143/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00158143)