Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference
deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked
set, and this line discloses that.
DDT Residues in an East Coast Estuary: A Case of Biological Concentration of a Persistent Insecticide
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBrown, E. and Y. A. Nishioka: Pesticides in selected western streams. A contribution to the national program. Pest. Mon. J. 1, 38?46 (1967).
no DOI — not checkedButler, P. A.: The significance of DDT residue in estuarine fauna. In: Chemical fallout, pp 205?220. Ed. by M. W. Miller and G. C. Berg, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas 1969.
no DOI — not checkedHicks, C. R.: Fundamental concepts in the design of experiments, 293 pp. N.Y., Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto, and London: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston 1964.
no DOI — not checkedKeith, J. O. and E. G. Hunt: Levels of insecticide residues in fish and wildlife in California. Trans. N. Am. Wildl. Conf. 31, 150?177 (1966).
no DOI — not checkedOdeman, M. W., P. w. Wild and K. C. Wilson: Calif. Fish. Game. MRO Ref. No. 68-112 (1968).
no DOI — not checkedSheets, T. J., M. Jackson and L. D. Phelps: A water monitoring system for pesticides in North Carolina. Rep. Water Resour. Res. Inst. Univ. N. Carolina 19, 1?59, 1?46 (1969).
no DOI — not checkedStefansson, U. and L. P. Atkinson: Physical and chemical properties of the shelf and slope waters off North Carolina. Tech. Rep. Beaufort, N.C., Duke Marine Laboratory 1?230 (1967).
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare: Report of the secretary's commission on pesticides and their relationships to environmental health. Parts I and II, 677 p. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office 1969.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-21 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.