Reference health

Impression management, overclaiming, and perceived unethical conduct: The role of male and female managers

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00380361
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 18 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-09-03

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1987.4307820
The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/0749-5978(86)90032-4
Social desirability response bias as one source of the discrepancy between subjective weights and regression weights
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.
resolves10.1037/h0023891
Personality characteristics and social and achievement behaviors associated with children's social desirability response tendencies.
resolves10.2307/3857571
Towards Candor, Cooperation, & Privacy in Applied Business Ethics Research: The Randomized Response Technique (RRT)
resolves10.1086/209351
Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning
resolves10.2307/255979
Social Desirability Response Effects: Three Alternative Models.
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.310
Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability?
resolves10.1037/0022-006X.54.3.309
Effects of response styles on the report of psychological and somatic distress.
resolves10.1016/0092-6566(74)90028-2
Two components of need for approval score and their relationship to cheating following success and failure
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
resolves10.1177/0013164490504008
An Investigation of Response Bias in the Chapman Scales
resolves10.1086/225231
Some Effects of "Social Desirability" in Survey Studies
resolves10.1007/BF00382838
Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment
resolves10.1007/BF00383696
The social desirability response bias in ethics research
resolves10.1007/BF01845895
Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions
resolves10.1002/1097-4679(199105)47:3<396::AID-JCLP2270470311>3.0.CO;2-K
The relationship between the Marlowe-Crowne form C and the validity scales of the MMPI
resolves10.1007/BF00386354
Believing that everyone else is less ethical: Implications for work behavior and ethics instruction
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedArlow, P. and T. A. Ulrich: 1980, ?Business Ethics, Social Responsibility and Business Students: An Empiricial Comparison of Clark's Study?, Akron Business and Economic Review 11, 17?23.
no DOI — not checkedFrederick, W. C., J. E. Post and K. Davis: 1992, Business and Society (McGraw Hill, Inc., New York).
no DOI — not checkedHollon, C. J. and T. A. Ulrich: 1979, ?Personal Business Ethics: Managers vs Managers-To-Be?, Southern Business Review, 5, 17?22.
no DOI — not checkedKohlberg, L.: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper & Row, New York).
no DOI — not checkedMcGuire, W. J.: 1968, ?Personality and Susceptibility to Social influence?, in E. F. Borgatta and W. W. Lambert, ed., Handbook of Personality Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago).
no DOI — not checkedPeterson, R. A. and R. A. Kerin: 1981, ?The Quality of Self-Report Data: Review and Synthesis?, in B. M. Enis and K. J. Roering eds, Review of Marketing (American Marketing Association, Chicago), 5?20.
no DOI — not checkedStevens, G. E.: 1984, ?Business Ethics and Social Responsibility: The Response of Present and Future Managers?, Akron Business and Economic Review (fall), 6?11.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00380361"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00380361/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00380361/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00380361)