Reference health

Use of chlorophyll meter for nitrogen management in lowland rice

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00749877
CiteStamped reference-health badge
8/8 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-11

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 8 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c31
Nitrogen—Total
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088118
Growth Rate and % N of Field Grown Crops: Theory and Experiments
resolves10.2134/agronj1974.00021962006600030027x
Length‐Width Method for Estimating Leaf Area of Rice<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1080/00103629509369344
Chlorophyll meter estimates leaf area‐based nitrogen concentration of rice
resolves10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500050005x
Adjustment for Specific Leaf Weight Improves Chlorophyll Meter's Estimate of Rice Leaf Nitrogen Concentration
resolves10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400010013x
Use of a Chlorophyll Meter to Predict Sidedress Nitrogen Requirements for Maize
resolves10.1007/BF02851988
Spectral reflectance ratio of rice canopy for estimating crop nitrogen status
resolves10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050029x
Chlorophyll Meter to Predict Nitrogen Topdress Requirement for Semidwarf Rice
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMarschner H (1986) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. pp 1?312, London: Academic Press
no DOI — not checkedPeng S and Cassman KG (1995) Chlorophyll meter-based nitrogen management. International Rice Research Institute Program Report 1994, IRRI, Philippins
no DOI — not checkedTakebe M and Yoneyama T (1989) Measurement of leaf colour scores and its implication to nitrogen nutrition of rice plant. JARQ 23: 86?93
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-11 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00749877"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00749877/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00749877/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00749877)