Reference health

Problems of species and genera inEucalyptus (Myrtaceae)

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00986148
CiteStamped reference-health badge
3/3 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

8 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 3 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1071/BT9710073
Male flowers in Eucalypts
resolves10.1111/j.1095-8339.1975.tb01644.x
On the Proteaceae-the evolution and classification of a southern family*
resolves10.1002/j.1537-2197.1972.tb10113.x
A RESOLUTION OF THE EUGENIA–SYZYGIUM CONTROVERSY (MYRTACEAE)
The 8 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBentham, G., 1867: Flora australiensis, Vol. 3. London: Reeve.
no DOI — not checkedBlakely, W. F., 1934: A Key to the Eucalypts, 1. ed. Sydney: The Worker Trustees.
no DOI — not checked?, 1965: A Key to the Eucalypts, 3. ed. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia Forestry and Timber Bureau.
no DOI — not checkedCarr, S. G. M., andCarr, D. J., 1963: The taxonomic position of certain eucalypts. Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria77, 207?216.
no DOI — not checkedDawson, J. W., 1970: Pacific capsular Myrtaceae. I. Reproductive morphology ofArillastrum gummiferum Panch. exBaillon (New Caledonia). Blumea18, 431?440.
no DOI — not checkedJohnson, L. A. S., 1972: Evolution and classification inEucalyptus. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. W.97, 11?29.
no DOI — not checkedPryor, L. D., andJohnson, L. A. S., 1971: A Classification of the Eucalypts. Canberra: Australian National University.
no DOI — not checkedTroll, W., 1964: Die Infloreszenzen, Band 1. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00986148"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00986148/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00986148/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf00986148)