Reference health

Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01073401
CiteStamped reference-health badge
19/19 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-02

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2234133
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1982.tb01138.x
RISK PERCEPTION IN PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICS
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511552069.007
Heuristics and biases in equity judgments: A utilitarian approach
resolves10.1007/BF01065312
Intuitions about penalties and compensation in the context of tort law
resolves10.1093/biomet/49.1-2.93
Robustness to non-normality of regression tests
resolves10.1007/BF00056166
Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility
resolves10.1007/BF01072612
Embedding effects: Stimulus representation and response mode
resolves10.2307/1964020
The Price Elasticity of Mass Preferences
resolves10.1007/BF01065347
Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S
Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00570.x
Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Psychological Perspective
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Judgment under Uncertainty
resolves10.2307/1242769
Can Contingent Valuation Measure Nonuse Values?
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(88)90034-4
Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation
resolves10.1006/jeem.1995.1009
Does Willingness to Pay Reflect the Purchase of Moral Satisfaction? A Reconsideration of Kahneman and Knetsch
resolves10.1007/BF01065351
An empirical investigation into the effect of psychological perceptions on the willingness-to-pay to reduce risk
resolves10.1016/0095-0696(92)90020-W
Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts
resolves10.1086/296365
Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions
resolves10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.371
Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAjzen, Icek. (1988).Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Chicago: Dorsey.
no DOI — not checkedBazerman, Max H. (1990).Judgment in Managerial Decision Making, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
no DOI — not checkedCarson, Richard T. et al. (1992).A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A report for the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, November 1992.
no DOI — not checkedContingent Valuation Panel. (1993). “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation,”Federal Register 58 (10), January 15,1993.
no DOI — not checkedD'Arge, Ralph C. (1989). “A Practical Guide to Economic Valuation of the Environment.” InThirty-Fourth Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute Proceedings. New York: Matthew Bendier and Co.
no DOI — not checkedDesvousges, William H. et al. (1992). “Measuring Non-Use Damages Using Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy,”Research Triangle Institute Monograph 92-1.
no DOI — not checkedDiamond, Peter A., and Jerry A. Hausman. (1993). “On Contingent Valuation Measurement of Non-Use Values.” In J.A. Hausman (ed.),Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
no DOI — not checkedDiamond, Peter A. et al. (1993). “Does Contingent Valuation Measure Preferences? Experimental Evidence.” In J.A. Hausman (ed.),Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
no DOI — not checkedEagly, Alice H., and Shelly Chaiken. (1993).The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
no DOI — not checkedGilovich, Thomas. (1991).How We Know What Isn 't So: The Fallibility of Human Reasoning in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.
no DOI — not checkedHanemann, W. Michael. (1992). “Comments Concerning Non-Use Values and The Contingent Valuation Method.” Submitted to the NOAA panel on the CVM, July 22,1992.
no DOI — not checkedKemp, Michael A., and Christopher Maxwell. (1993). “Exploring a budget context for contingent valuation estimates.” In J.A. Hausman (ed.),Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
no DOI — not checkedMargolis, H. (1982).Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedMcClelland, Gary H. et al. (1992).Methods of Measuring Non-Use Values: A Contingent Valuation Study of Groundwater Cleanup. Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado.
no DOI — not checkedMcFadden, Daniel, and Gregory K. Leonard. (1993). “Issues in the Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods.” In J.A. Hausman (ed.),Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. Amsterdam: North Holland Press.
no DOI — not checkedPetty, Richard E., and John T. Caccioppo. (1986). “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123–205. San Diego: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedRandall, Alan, and John P. Hoehn. (1992). “Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation: Implications for Natural Resource Damage Assessment.” Staff Paper No. 92-14, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University.
no DOI — not checkedSchkade, David A., and John W. Payne. “How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis,”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, in press.
no DOI — not checkedSeber, G.A.F. (1977).Linear Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
no DOI — not checkedTolley, George S., and Alan Randall. (1983).Establishing and Valuing the Effects of Improved Visibility in the Eastern United States. Interim report to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
no DOI — not checkedTversky, Amos, Paul Slovic, and Daniel Kahneman. (1990). “The Causes of Preference Reversal,”American Economic Review 80, 204–217.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-02 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01073401"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01073401/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01073401/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01073401)