Reference health
Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments.
66/66 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
34 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 66 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/00049537908254652
Juror-defendant similarity and the assessment of guilt in politically motivated crimes
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.267
Effects of stereotypes in decision making and information-processing strategies.
resolves10.1177/001112878002600409
Arbitrariness and Discrimination under Post-Furman Capital Statutes
resolves10.1007/BF01039151
Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.36.12.1424
Authoritarianism and decisions of mock juries: Evidence of jury bias and group polarization.
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.
resolves10.1037/h0047299
Racial prejudice, interpersonal attraction, and assumed dissimilarity of attitudes.
resolves10.1037/h0033948
Victim or perpetrator?: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice.
resolves10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608
Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma.
resolves10.1007/BF01039806
Rape trials and jurors' decisions: A psycholegal analysis of the effects of victim, defendant, and case characteristics.
resolves10.1037/h0036204
Distinctiveness of social categorization and attitude toward ingroup members.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1993.tb01112.x
The Effect of Strong Versus Weak Evidence on the Assessment of Race Stereotypic and Race Nonstereotypic Crimes
<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.2224/sbp.1973.1.1.1
SIMULATED JURY DECISIONS: THE INFLUENCE OF JURY-DEFENDANT ATTITUDE SIMILARITY-DISSIMILARITY
resolves10.1037/h0076852
Actor-observer differences in the perceptions of responsibility and freedom.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.301
Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior.
resolves10.1080/00224545.1985.9713511
Gender and Social Categorization: Familiarity and Ingroup Polarization in Recall and Evaluation
resolves10.2307/2786115
Changes in Social Perception as a Function of the Personal Relevance of Behavior
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories.
resolves10.1177/014616727900500314
Effects of Locus-of-Control, Outcome Severity, and Attitudinal Similarity of Defendant on Attributions of Criminal Responsibility
resolves10.1207/s15324834basp0301_2
Race, Rape, and Bias: Distortion of Prior Odds and Meaning Changes
resolves10.2307/800760
Jurors' Responses to Victims' Behavior and Legal Issues in Sexual Assault Trials
resolves10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00136.x
Effects of valence, severity, arid relevance on responsibility and dispositional attribution
resolves10.1111/j.1745-3984.1970.tb00727.x
USING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE WITH A DICHOTOMOUS DEPENDENT VARIABLE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter‐and intra‐group situations
resolves10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification
resolves10.2466/pr0.1975.36.1.239
Effects of Outcome Valence and Severity on Attribution of Responsibility
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(74)90030-4
Size of defeat and liking for superior and similar ability competitors
resolves10.1037/h0032603
When similarity "hurts": Effects of perceived ability and a humorous blunder on interpersonal attractiveness.
resolves10.1037/h0034263
The defendant's dilemma: Effects of jurors' attitudes and authoritarianism on judicial decisions.
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00840.x
Better or different? III: The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative in‐group size upon intergroup discrimination
resolves10.1177/014616727900500407
The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00500.x
Ambiguity and Guilt Determinations: A Modern Racism Perspective<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1037/h0028777
Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.54
The repulsion hypothesis revisited: Similarity irrelevance or dissimilarity bias?
resolves10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.523
Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01160.x
Habla Ingles? The Effects of Language Translation on Simulated Juror Decisions<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1002/bsl.2370100204
The influence of race on sentencing: A meta‐analytic review of experimental studies
resolves10.1016/0022-1031(79)90025-8
Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility
resolves10.1007/BF01039149
A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics.
The 34 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBailey, F. L., & Rothblatt, H. B. (1985).Successful techniques for criminal trials. Rochester, NY: Lawyers Co-Operative.
no DOI — not checkedBaldus, D. C., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C. A., Jr. (1990).Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
no DOI — not checkedBatson v. Kentucky (1986).United States Supreme Court Reports, 476, 79.
no DOI — not checkedBelli, M. (1963).Modern trials (abridged ed.). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
no DOI — not checkedBernard, J. L. (1979). Interaction between the race of the defendant and that of the jurors in determining verdicts.Law and Psychology Review, 5, 103–111.
no DOI — not checkedBowers, W. J., Pierce, G. L., & McDevitt, J. F. (1984).Legal homicide: Death as punishment in America, 1864–1982. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
no DOI — not checkedBray, R. M., & Kerr, N. L. (1982). Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.),The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 287–324). New York: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedBusch, F. (1959).Law and tactics in jury trials (Vol. 1). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
no DOI — not checkedByrne, D. (1971).The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedDane, F. C., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1982). Effects of defendants' and victims' characteristics on jurors' verdicts. In N. L. Kerr, & R. M. Bray (Eds.),The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 83–118) New York: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedDavis, J. H., Bray, R. M., & Holt, R. (1977). The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A Critical review. In J. Tapp & F. Levine (Eds.),Law, justice, and the individual in society (pp. 326–361). New York: Holt.
no DOI — not checkedDodge, L. (1990).Death penalty sentencing (Report No. B-236876). Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
no DOI — not checkedDuncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 621–634.
no DOI — not checkedFoley, L. A. (1993).A psychological view of the legal system. Madison, WS: Brown & Benchmark.
no DOI — not checkedFoley, L. A., & Rasche, C. E. (1979). The effect of race on sentence, actual time served. and final disposition of female offenders. In J. A. Conley (Ed.),Theory and research in criminal justice: Current perspectives. Cincinnati: Anderson.
no DOI — not checkedFukurai, H., Butler, E., & Krooth, R. (1992).Race and the jury. New York: Plenum.
no DOI — not checkedFulero, S. M., & Penrod, S. D. (1990). Attorney jury selection folklore: What do they think and how can psychologists help?Forensic Reports, 3, 233–259.
no DOI — not checkedGerard, J. B., & Terry, T. R. (1970). Discrimination against Negroes in the administration of criminal law in Missouri.Washington State University Law Quarterly, 415–437.
no DOI — not checkedGerbasi, K. C., & Zuckerman, M. (April, 1975). An experimental investigation of jury biasing factors. Paper presented at the meetings of the Eastern Psychological Association. New York City.
no DOI — not checkedGobert, J. J., & Jordan, W. E. (1990).Jury selection: The law, art, and science of selecting a jury (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
no DOI — not checkedGross, S. R., & Mauro, R. (1989).Death and discrimination: Racial disparities in criminal sentencing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
no DOI — not checkedJordan, W. E. (1980).Jury selection. New York: McGraw-Hill.
no DOI — not checkedKalven, H., & Zeisel, H.,The American jury. Boston: Little Brown.
no DOI — not checkedKeeton, R. E. (1973).Trial tactics and methods (2nd ed.), Boston: Little, Brown.
no DOI — not checkedLewin, K. (1951). Problems of research in psychology. InField theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (pp. 155–169). New York: Harper & Brothers.
no DOI — not checkedMarques, J. M. (1990). The black sheep effect: Outgroup homogeneity in social comparison settings. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.),Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 131–151). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
no DOI — not checkedOwen, I. (1973).Defending criminal cases before juries. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
no DOI — not checkedStasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Bray, R. M. (1982). The social psychology of jury deliberations: Structure, process, and product. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.),The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 221–256). New York: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedStasser, G., Kerr, N. L., & Davis, J. H. (1989). Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.),Psychology of group influence (2nd Ed.) (pp. 279–326), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedSue, S., Smith, R. E., & Caldwell, C. (1973). Effects of inadmissible evidence on the decision of simulated jurors: A moral dilemma.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 344–353.
no DOI — not checkedSunnafrank, M., & Fontes, N. E. (1983). General and crime related racial stereotypes and influences on juridic decisions.Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 17, 1–15.
no DOI — not checkedTajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.),The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
no DOI — not checkedWishman, S. (1986).Anatomy of a jury: The system on trial. New York: Times Books.
no DOI — not checkedWrightsman, L. S. (1987).Psychology and the legal system. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-09-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01499374"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01499374/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf01499374)