Reference health
Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice
35/35 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 35 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/799780
The "Chivalrous" Treatment of the Female Offender in the Arms of the Criminal Justice System: A Review of the Literature
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1987.tb00290.x
Job Values, Rewards, and Work Conditions as Factors in Job Satisfaction Among Men and Women
resolves10.1177/002224377801500314
Women Contrasted to Men in the Industrial Salesforce: Job Satisfaction, Values, Role Clarity, Performance, and Propensity to Leave
resolves10.1080/23277556.1991.10871123
Court-Ordered Arbitration in North Carolina: Case Outcomes and Litigant Satisfaction
resolves10.1177/001872678403700803
Perceived Job Attributes, Job Satisfaction, and Psychological Distress: A Comparison of Working Men and Women
resolves10.1177/001872678203500202
Differences in Job Motivation and Satisfaction Among Female and Male Managers
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.123
An examination of attitudinal differences between policewomen and policemen.
resolves10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0
In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and of Morality
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01527.x
Gender Differences in Job Satisfaction: Why Aren't Women More Dissatisfied?
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x
Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer?
resolves10.1111/j.1533-8525.1984.tb00209.x
Gender, Working Conditions and the Job Satisfaction of Women in a Non-Traditional Occupation: Female Correctional Officers in Men's Prisons
resolves10.1016/0030-5073(77)90068-X
The applied behavior analysis approach and individual employees: Improving performance in two small businesses
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1982.tb00435.x
WOMEN, CRIME, AND DEPENDENCY <i>An Application of the Theory of Law</i>
resolves10.1002/job.4030120408
The combined effects of job and family characteristics on the job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation of men and women workers
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952
Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments.
resolves10.2307/2393412
Individual and Corporate Dispute Resolution: Using Procedural Fairness as a Decision Heuristic
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.643
Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.
resolves10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb01744.x
Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.2307/3053616
In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of their Experiences in the Civil Justice System
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.598
Role of gender, interpersonal orientation, and self-presentation in distributive-justice behavior.
resolves10.1177/001872678603900405
Gender Differences in Work Satisfaction, Work-Related Rewards and Values, and the Determinants of Work Satisfaction
resolves10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb00461.x
SEX DIFFERENCES IN JOB SATISFACTION: A RE‐EXAMINATION<sup>1</sup>
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850
Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice.
resolves10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00273.x
Intrinsic Versus Community‐Based Justice Models: When Does Group Membership Matter?
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.72
Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control.
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York.
no DOI — not checkedBernstein, I. S., Nagel, S., Cardasia, J., and Ross, C. E. (1979). Defendants' sex and criminal court decisions. In Alvarez, R. (ed.),Discrimination in Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 339–354.
no DOI — not checkedBies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Bazerman, M. H., and Sheppard, B. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43–55.
no DOI — not checkedBrett, J. M. (1986). Commentary on procedural justice papers. In Lewicki, R. J., Bazerman, M., and Sheppard, B. H. (eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 81–90.
no DOI — not checkedChesney-Lind, M. (1978). Chivalry reexamined: Women and the criminal justice system. In Bowker, L. (ed.),Women, Crime, and the Criminal Justice System, D. C. Heath, Lexington, MA, pp. 197–223.
no DOI — not checkedChin, A., and Peterson, M. (1985).Deep Pockets, Empty Pockets: Who Wins in Cook County Jury Trials, Institute for Civil Justice, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
no DOI — not checkedCohen, J. (1988).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
no DOI — not checkedCrosby, F. J. (1982).Relative Deprivation and Working Women, Oxford University Press, New York.
no DOI — not checkedErickson, B., and Nosanchuk, T. A. (1977).Understanding Data, McGraw-Hill Reyerson Ltd., Toronto, Canada.
no DOI — not checkedGilligan, C. (1982).In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
no DOI — not checkedGreenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano R. (ed.),Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
no DOI — not checkedHerzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R. O., and Capwell, D. F. (1957).Job Attitudes: Review of Research and Opinion, Psychological Services of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
no DOI — not checkedLawler, E. E. (1981).Pay and Organization Development, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
no DOI — not checkedLind, E. A. (1990).Arbitrating High-Stakes Cases: An Evaluation of Court-Annexed Arbitration in a United States District Court, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
no DOI — not checkedMacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., Hensler, D. R., Bryant, D. B., and Ebener, P. A. (1988).Alternative Adjudication: An Evaluation of the New Jersey Automobile Arbitration Program, Institute for Civil Justice, RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
no DOI — not checkedMacCoun, R. J., Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1991). Alternative dispute resolution in the courts. In Kagehiro, D., and Laufer W. (eds.),Handbook of Psychology and Law, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 95–118.
no DOI — not checkedMajor, B. (1987). Gender, justice, and the psychology of entitlement. In Shayer, P., and Hendricks, C. (eds.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 7, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 124–148.
no DOI — not checkedMessick, D. M., and Sentis, K. (1983). Fairness, preference, and fairness biases. In Messick, D., and Cook, K. (eds.),Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives, Praeger, New York, pp. 61–94.
no DOI — not checkedMoulds, E. F. (1980). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. In Datesman, S., and Scarpitti, F. (eds.),Women, Crime, and Justice, Oxford, New York, pp. 275–299.
no DOI — not checkedMowday, R. T. (1991). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In Steers, R., and Porter, L. (eds.),Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 111–131.
no DOI — not checkedPollak, O. (1950).The Criminality of Women. A. S. Barnes, New York.
no DOI — not checkedShapiro, J., and Stern, L. (1975). Job satisfaction: Male and female, professional and nonprofessional workers.Personnel J. 54: 388–389.
no DOI — not checkedSweeney, P. D., and McFarlin, D. B. (1992). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Paper presented at meetings of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal.
no DOI — not checkedThibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975).Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Plenum, New York.
no DOI — not checkedTyler, T. R. (1990)Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
no DOI — not checkedTyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, pp. 115–192.
no DOI — not checkedWalster, E., Walster, G. W., and Bersheid, E. (1978).Equity: Theory and Research, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02196990"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02196990/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02196990)