Reference health

Blaug on Kuhn versus Lakatos and the marginalist revolution

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02303290
CiteStamped reference-health badge
3/3 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 3 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511572203.007
Kuhn versus Lakatos <i>or</i> Paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511607943
The Evolution of Economic Ideas
resolves10.1017/CBO9781139171434
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedMark Blaug,Economic Theory in Retrospect, London: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
no DOI — not checkedPaul Feyerabend,Against Method, New York: New Left Press, 1975.
no DOI — not checkedD. F. Gordon, “The Role of the History of Economic Thought in the Understanding of Modern Economic Theory,”The American Economic Review, 55, 1965, pp. 119–27.
no DOI — not checkedJ. Hicks,Collected Economic Papers, Vol. 1, Wealth and Welfare, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
no DOI — not checkedJ. Hicks,Capital and Growth, New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.
no DOI — not checkedI. Lakatos,Essays in Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
no DOI — not checkedS. Latsis (ed.),Method and Appraisal in Economics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
no DOI — not checkedD. Patinkin,Money, Interest and Prices, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.
no DOI — not checkedJ. A. Schumpeter,A History of Economic Doctrines and Method, New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02303290"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02303290/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02303290/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02303290)