Reference health

On expectations and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02425259
CiteStamped reference-health badge
8/8 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

7 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 8 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/jep.5.2.171
Are Economists Different, and If So, Why?
resolves10.1006/game.1994.1021
Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments
resolves10.2469/faj.v46.n6.50
Understanding and Assessing Financial Risk Tolerance: A Biological Perspective
resolves10.1006/game.1994.1056
Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games
resolves10.1016/0167-2681(89)90056-5
Fiat money as a store of value in an experimental market
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00880.x
REWARDS, EXPERIENCE AND DECISION COSTS IN FIRST PRICE AUCTIONS
resolves10.1111/j.1465-7295.1993.tb00881.x
MONETARY REWARDS AND DECISION COST IN EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS
resolves10.2307/1912161
The Recovery of Risk Preferences from Actual Choices
The 7 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedEckel CC, Grossman P (1992) The price of fairness: Gender differences in punishment games. Department of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute
no DOI — not checkedHoffman E, McCabe K, Smith V (1996) Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review (forthcoming)
no DOI — not checkedKahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. In Hogarth RM, Reder MW (eds) Rational Choice, Chicago, University of Chicago Press 101–116
no DOI — not checkedMcCloskey DN (1985) The loss function has been mislaid: The rhetoric of significance tests. American Economic Review 75: 201–205
no DOI — not checkedRobinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS (1991) Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. New York, Academic Press
no DOI — not checkedRoth AE, Prasnikar V, Okuno-Fujiwara M, Zamir S (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81: 1068–1095
no DOI — not checkedTelser KG (1993) The ultimatum game: A comment. Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Chicago
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

view as graph · paper page

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02425259"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02425259/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02425259/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02425259)