Reference health
Citation cycles and peer review cycles
19/19 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-28
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
31 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 19 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/030631277300300302
The Development of Specialties in Social Science: The Case of Ethnomethodology
resolves10.1007/BF01881390
The development of a scientific specialty: The phage group and the origins of molecular biology
resolves10.1177/030631277700700203
The State of a Science: Indicators in the Specialty of Weak Interactions
resolves10.1177/030631277400400102
The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties
resolves10.1177/030631282012001005
Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science
resolves10.1177/030631277400400305
Essay Review: The Quantitative Study of Science: an Examination of the Literature
resolves10.1007/BF02017338
New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications
The 31 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedJ. Ziman, Science in a ‘steady state’: The research system in transition, Tech. rep., Science Policy Support Group, London, 1987.
no DOI — not checkedM. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scot, M. Trow,The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary, Societies, Sage, London, 1994.
no DOI — not checkedA. Elzinga, Research, bureaucracy and the drift of epistemic criteria, in:The University Research System: The Public Policies of the Home of Scientist, Almqvist and Wiksell International, Stockholm, 1985.
no DOI — not checkedL. Leydesdorff, H. Etzkowitz, Emergence of a triple helix of university industry-government relations,Science & Public Policy, (1996) forthcoming.
no DOI — not checkedA. Rip, The postmodern research system. Paper presented at the 1996 Progress Conference of the Department of Science and Technology Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, September 16–17 1996, (1996).
no DOI — not checkedS. Slaughter, G. Rhoades, The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology,Social Studies of Science, 21 (1996) No. 3, 303–339.
no DOI — not checkedD. Solla Price,Science since Babylon, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1961.
no DOI — not checkedD. Solla Price, The citation cycle, in:The American Society for Information Science, 8th Mid-Year Meeting, May 16–19, 1979 Collected Papers, 1979.
no DOI — not checkedN. C. Mullins,Theory and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology, Harper & Row, New York, 1973.
no DOI — not checkedD. O. Edge, M. J. Mulkay,Astronomy Transformed: The Emergence of Radio Astronomy in Britain, Wiley, New York, 1976.
no DOI — not checkedJ. G. O'Connor, A. J. Meadows, Specialization and professionalization in british geology,Social Studies of Science, 11 (1981) 77–89.
no DOI — not checkedK. E. Studer, D. E. Chubin,The Cancer Mission. Social Contexts of Biomedical Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1980.
no DOI — not checkedH. Etzkowitz, Academic-industry relations: A sociological paradigm for economic development, in:Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory. New Directions in, Technology Studies (L. Leydesdorff, P van den Besselaar (Eds), Pinter Publishers, London, 1994, p. 139–151.
no DOI — not checkedK. Knorr-Cetina,The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Pergamon, Oxford, 1981.
no DOI — not checkedM. Callon, Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieux Bay, inPower, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? J. Law (Ed.) Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Sociological Review Monograph, 1986, p. 196–229.
no DOI — not checkedL. Leydesdorff,The Challenge of Scientometrics, DSWO Press, Leiden, 1995.
no DOI — not checkedN. Luhmann,Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp Taschenbuch, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedM. Lynch, S. Woolgar,Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990.
no DOI — not checkedH. R. Maturana, F. J. Varela,The Tree of Knowledge, New Science Library, Boston, 1988.
no DOI — not checkedD. J. Haraway,Simians, Cyborgs, and Women—The Reinvention of Nature, Free Associations Books, London, 1991.
no DOI — not checkedC. Geertz,Local Knowledge, Basic Books, New York, 1983.
no DOI — not checkedD. Chubin, E. J. Hackett,Peerless Science: Peer review and U.S. Science Policy, State University of New York Press, Albany, US, 1990.
no DOI — not checkedA. Rip, Contextual transformations in contemporary science, in:Keeping Science Straight: A Critical Look at the Assessment of Science and Technology A. Jamison (Ed.), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 1988.
no DOI — not checkedC. E. Shannon, W. Weaver,The Mathematical Theory of Communication, The University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949.
no DOI — not checkedG. Bateson,Mind and Nature, Bantam, New York, 1980.
no DOI — not checkedP. Wouters, The citation culture. How the citation came out of the bag and why it is hard to put it back in, to be published.
no DOI — not checkedD. Solla Price,Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology and Non-science, D. C. Heath & Co., Lexington, Mass., 1970, p. 3–22.
no DOI — not checkedF. Narin,Evaluative Bibliometrics, Computer Horizons Inc., Cherry Hill, N.J., 1976.
no DOI — not checkedB. J. R. van der Meulen,Evaluation Processes in Science: the Construction of Quality by Science, Government and Industry, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedB. J. R. van der Meulen, Indicators in a framework of judgement and control, in:Representations of Science and Technology: Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Bielefeld 10–12 June, 1990,P. Weingart, R. Sehringer, M. Winterhager (Eds), DSWO Press, Leiden, 1992.
no DOI — not checkedW. Glänzel, U. Schoepflin, Little scientometrics, big scientometrics… and beyond?,Science, 30 (1994) 375–384.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-28 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02461122"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02461122/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02461122)