Reference health

Computer technologies: Attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02497085
CiteStamped reference-health badge
21/21 checkable references clean · checked 2026-09-03

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

21 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 21 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/009392857962006
Instructional Computing
resolves10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.
resolves10.1007/BF01663995
Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.35.3.125
Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.
resolves10.1080/08832323.1987.10772848
Use of Personal Computers in Business Education at Undergraduate Institutions
resolves10.1177/0013164492052003014
Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of the Adult-Attitudes toward Computers Survey for a Sample of Professional Nurses
resolves10.3758/BF03203774
Computers and the liberal arts: Challenge to psychology
resolves10.1080/08832323.1987.10772811
A Set of Basic Computing Capabilities for Undergraduate Business Students
resolves10.1007/978-94-015-7259-0
Instrument Development in the Affective Domain
resolves10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80084-0
Computer anxiety: sex, race and age
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.307
Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers.
resolves10.1300/J025v05n01_05
Self-Efficacy Expectations as a Predictor of Computer Use:
resolves10.2190/XTJJ-BK1N-44DV-NXL0
Student Responses to Computers: A Longitudinal Study
resolves10.1016/0747-5632(89)90015-0
Effects of psychology courseware use on computer anxiety in students
resolves10.1177/0013164485454021
The Reliability and Validity of an Instrument for the Assessment of Computer Attitudes
resolves10.1080/0962029920010103
Curriculum Development and New Information Technology
resolves10.1007/BF00289956
The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college
resolves10.1037/0022-0663.73.1.93
Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis.
resolves10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::AID-PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2-7
Self-efficacy and classroom learning
resolves10.1016/0747-5632(86)90007-5
Cultural socialization to computing in college
resolves10.3928/0148-4834-19910201-04
Computer Anxiety in Nursing Students
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdams, T. (1988). On line: Accounts and computers.Australian Accountant 2: 95–98.
no DOI — not checkedAiken, L. R. (1980). Attitude measurement and research. In D. A. Payne (ed.),Recent Developments in Affective Measurement (pp. 1–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) (1987–88).Accreditation Council Policies, Procedures, and Standards, 1987–88. St Louis, MO: AACSB.
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989).Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology, Washington, DC: AAAS.
no DOI — not checkedBartholome, L. W. (1984). Microcomputers in business: How are they being used?Journal of Business Education 11: 63–66.
no DOI — not checkedBecker, H. J. (1986). Our national report card: Preliminary results from the new Johns Hopkins survey.Computer Classroom Learning, January, pp. 30–33.
no DOI — not checkedDelaney, C. W. (1989). Nurse educators' acceptance of the computer in baccalaureate nursing programs.Computers in Nursing 7(3): 129–136.
no DOI — not checkedDelcourt, M. A. B., M. B. Kinzie (1990). ATTITUDES TOWARD COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES (ACT) and SELF-EFFICACY FOR COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES (SCT). Unpublished manuscript. McGill University, Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
no DOI — not checkedDelcourt, M. A. B., and M. B. Kinzie (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy.Journal of Research & Development in Education 27: 31–37.
no DOI — not checkedDeLoughry, T. J. (1993, April 28). Two researchers say “technophobia” may afflict millions of students.Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A25–26.
no DOI — not checkedJacobson, S. F., M. E. Holder, and J. F. Dearner (1989). Computer anxiety among nursing students, educators, staff, and administrators.Computers in Nursing 7(6): 266–272.
no DOI — not checkedLoyd, B. H., and D. E. Loyd (1988, April). Computer attitudes: Differences by gender and amount of computer experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
no DOI — not checkedOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). (1986).Teacher Preparation in the Use of Computers (Report No. CS 86 221b). Washington, DC: OERI.
no DOI — not checkedOwen, S. V. (April, 1986).Using self-efficacy in program evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
no DOI — not checkedPedhazur, E. J. (1982).Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
no DOI — not checkedSchwirian, P. M., J. A. Malone, V. J. Stone, B. Nunley, and T. Francisco (1989). Computers in nursing practice: A comparison of the attitudes of nurses and nursing students.Computers in Nursing 7(4): 168–177.
no DOI — not checkedSimmons, L. P., E. B. Rice, and R. J. Buttermilch (1991). The integration of computers into the accounting curriculum.Collegiate Microcomputer 9(3): 181–189.
no DOI — not checkedTabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell (1989).Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
no DOI — not checkedThomas, B. S. (1985). A survey study of computers in nursing education.Computers in Nursing 3: 173–179.
no DOI — not checkedVan Dover, L., and S. Boblin (1991). Student nurse computer experience and preferences for learning.Computers in Nursing 9(2): 75–79.
no DOI — not checkedZubrow, D. (1987). How computing attitudes change during the freshman year. In S. Kiesler and L. Sproull (eds.),Computing and Change on Campus (pp. 195–211). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-09-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02497085"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02497085/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02497085/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02497085)