Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known
work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction,
withdrawal, or removal notice.
The 21 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAdams, T. (1988). On line: Accounts and computers.Australian Accountant 2: 95–98.
no DOI — not checkedAiken, L. R. (1980). Attitude measurement and research. In D. A. Payne (ed.),Recent Developments in Affective Measurement (pp. 1–24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) (1987–88).Accreditation Council Policies, Procedures, and Standards, 1987–88. St Louis, MO: AACSB.
no DOI — not checkedAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989).Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology, Washington, DC: AAAS.
no DOI — not checkedBartholome, L. W. (1984). Microcomputers in business: How are they being used?Journal of Business Education 11: 63–66.
no DOI — not checkedBecker, H. J. (1986). Our national report card: Preliminary results from the new Johns Hopkins survey.Computer Classroom Learning, January, pp. 30–33.
no DOI — not checkedDelaney, C. W. (1989). Nurse educators' acceptance of the computer in baccalaureate nursing programs.Computers in Nursing 7(3): 129–136.
no DOI — not checkedDelcourt, M. A. B., M. B. Kinzie (1990). ATTITUDES TOWARD COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES (ACT) and SELF-EFFICACY FOR COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES (SCT). Unpublished manuscript. McGill University, Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
no DOI — not checkedDelcourt, M. A. B., and M. B. Kinzie (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy.Journal of Research & Development in Education 27: 31–37.
no DOI — not checkedDeLoughry, T. J. (1993, April 28). Two researchers say “technophobia” may afflict millions of students.Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A25–26.
no DOI — not checkedJacobson, S. F., M. E. Holder, and J. F. Dearner (1989). Computer anxiety among nursing students, educators, staff, and administrators.Computers in Nursing 7(6): 266–272.
no DOI — not checkedLoyd, B. H., and D. E. Loyd (1988, April). Computer attitudes: Differences by gender and amount of computer experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
no DOI — not checkedOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). (1986).Teacher Preparation in the Use of Computers (Report No. CS 86 221b). Washington, DC: OERI.
no DOI — not checkedOwen, S. V. (April, 1986).Using self-efficacy in program evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
no DOI — not checkedPedhazur, E. J. (1982).Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
no DOI — not checkedSchwirian, P. M., J. A. Malone, V. J. Stone, B. Nunley, and T. Francisco (1989). Computers in nursing practice: A comparison of the attitudes of nurses and nursing students.Computers in Nursing 7(4): 168–177.
no DOI — not checkedSimmons, L. P., E. B. Rice, and R. J. Buttermilch (1991). The integration of computers into the accounting curriculum.Collegiate Microcomputer 9(3): 181–189.
no DOI — not checkedTabachnick, B. G., and L. S. Fidell (1989).Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper & Row.
no DOI — not checkedThomas, B. S. (1985). A survey study of computers in nursing education.Computers in Nursing 3: 173–179.
no DOI — not checkedVan Dover, L., and S. Boblin (1991). Student nurse computer experience and preferences for learning.Computers in Nursing 9(2): 75–79.
no DOI — not checkedZubrow, D. (1987). How computing attitudes change during the freshman year. In S. Kiesler and L. Sproull (eds.),Computing and Change on Campus (pp. 195–211). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
checked 2026-09-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.