Reference health

The conceptualization and measurement of product usage

https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02729763
CiteStamped reference-health badge
15/15 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 15 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1086/208892
Developmental Recognition of Consumption Symbolism
resolves10.1086/208812
Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis
resolves10.1177/089443938500100102
Computing in the Home: A Research Paradigm
resolves10.1086/209021
A Propositional Inventory for New Diffusion Research
resolves10.1086/208906
The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun
resolves10.1086/208990
Product Familiarity and Learning New Information
resolves10.1080/08838158009363989
Program playback preferences in VCR households
resolves10.1177/107769908105800308
Home Video Recorders and Time Shifting
resolves10.1086/208926
Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review
resolves10.1007/BF02723396
Microcomputer versus mainframe usage by marketing professionals
resolves10.1086/208971
The Role of Products as Social Stimuli: A Symbolic Interactionism Perspective
resolves10.1177/002224378201900212
The Measurement of Consumption: A Comparison of Surveys and Diaries
resolves10.1177/002224376400100202
On the Accuracy of Recording of Consumer Panels: I
resolves10.1177/002224376400100311
On the Accuracy of Recording of Consumer Panels: II
resolves10.1177/002224377901600106
On the Measurement of Purchase Data: Surveys versus Purchase Diaries
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBelk, Russell W. 1979. “A Free Response Approach to Developing Product-Specific Consumption Situation Taxonomies.” InAnalytical Approaches to Product and Marketing Planning. Ed. Allan D. Shocker. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute. 177–196.
no DOI — not checkedBloch, Peter H. 1981. “An Exploration into the Scaling of Consumers' Involvement with a Product Class.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Ed. Kent B. Monroe. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research. 8: 61–65.
no DOI — not checkedHarvey, M. G., and J. T. Rothe. 1986. “Video Cassette Recorders: Their Impact on Viewers and Advertisers.”Journal of Advertising Research. 25(6): 19–27.
no DOI — not checkedMetzger, G. 1986. “Contam's VCR Research.”Journal of Advertising Research 26 (2): RC8–12.
no DOI — not checkedPotter, S. James, Edward Forrest, Barry S. Sapolsky, and William Ware. 1988. “Segmenting VCR Owners.”Journal of Advertising Research. 28(2): 29–39.
no DOI — not checkedPrice, Linda L. and Nancy M. Ridgway. 1983. “Development of a Scale to Measure Use Innovativeness.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Eds. Richard P. Bagozzi and Alice M. Tybout. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research. 10: 679–684.
no DOI — not checkedRam, S. and Hyung-Shik Jung. 1989. “The Link Between Involvement, Use Innovativeness and Product Usage.” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Ed. Thomas K. Srull. Hawaii: Association for Consumer Research, 16: 160–166.
no DOI — not checkedSrivastava, Rajendra K., Allan D. Shocker, and George S. Day. 1978. “An Exploratory Study of the Influences of Usage Situation on Perceptions of Product Markets.”Advances in Consumer Research. Ed. Keith Hunt. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research. 5: 32–37.
no DOI — not checkedZaichkowsky, Judith Lynne. 1985. “Familiarity: Product Use, Involvement or Expertise?” InAdvances in Consumer Research. Eds. Elizabeth C. Hirschman and Morris B. Holbrook. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 12: 296–299.
no DOI — not checkedZaichkowsky, Judith Lynne. (1988). “What is Familiarity?”Working Paper. Simon Fraser University.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02729763"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02729763/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02729763/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf02729763)