Reference health
Behavioural mechanisms of conflict avoidance among shrews
54/54 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
31 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 54 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1002/ab.1030
The functions of freezing in the social interactions of juvenile high‐ and low‐aggressive mice
resolves10.1037/0735-7036.115.1.68
Habituation as a mechanism of reduced aggression between neighboring territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana).
resolves10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80047-4
Interspecific interactions between three sympatric species of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys)
resolves10.1007/BF02272406
Intra- and interindividual variation in flank gland secretions of free-ranging shrewsCrocidura russula
resolves10.1111/j.1469-7998.1984.tb02371.x
Dietary separation in three species of shrew inhabiting water‐cress beds
resolves10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01034.x
Food niche overlap and ecological separation amongst six species of coexisting forest shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae) in the Russian Far East
resolves10.1163/036551666X00084
Intraspecific and Interspecific Competition in the Shrews Sorex Araneus L. and S. Minutus L
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8341.1998.tb01001.x
Ethological strategies for defence in animals and humans: Their role in some psychiatric disorders
resolves10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11833.x
Direct interference or indirect exploitation? An experimental study of fitness costs of interspecific competition in voles
resolves10.1023/A:1027305410005
Interspecific competition in small rodents: from populations to individuals
resolves10.1016/j.bbr.2004.04.018
Protean behavior under barn-owl attack: voles alternate between freezing and fleeing and spiny mice flee in alternating patterns
resolves10.1006/anbe.1999.1224
Differential behavioural and hormonal responses of voles and spiny mice to owl calls
resolves10.1163/156854291X00027
Interspecific Interactions Between the Shrews Sorex Araneaus L. and S. Minutus L. (Soricidae, Insectivora) and the Use of Habitat: a Laboratory Study*)
resolves10.1007/BF00388076
Experimental field evidence of interspecific aggression between two species of kangaroo rat (Dipodomys)
resolves10.1016/0003-3472(70)90035-7
Xperimental studies of competitive interaction in a two-species system II. The behaviour of Mkrotus, peromyscus and Clethrionomys species
resolves10.1139/z97-126
Are staged dyadic encounters useful for studying aggressive behaviour of arvicoline rodents?
resolves10.2307/1379707
Odor as a Possible Isolating Mechanism in Sympatric Species of Shrews (Sorex vagrans and Sorex obscurus)
resolves10.2307/1379334
Home Range, Territoriality and Ecological Separation in Sympatric Shrews, Sorex vagrans and Sorex obscurus
resolves10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00005-5
Pair-Bond Disruption in Mongolian Gerbils: Effects on Subsequent Social Behaviour
resolves10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00118.x
Behavioural response of wild rodents to the calls of an owl: a comparative study
resolves10.2307/3544837
Responses of Bank Voles to Odours of Seven Species of Predators: Experimental Data and Their Relevance to Natural Predator-Vole Relationships
resolves10.1007/BF02350001
Intra- and interspecific antagonistic behaviour in two sympatric species of water shrews:Neomys fodiens andN. anomalus
resolves10.4098/AT.arch.94-27
Agonistic interactions between resident and immigrant sympatric water shrews: Neomys fodiens and N. anomalus
resolves10.1007/s002650000223
The red and the black: habituation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants
resolves10.1016/S0091-3057(00)00382-8
Effects of social defeat and of diazepam on behavior in a resident–intruder test in male DBA/2 mice
resolves10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80039-5
The social organization and territoriality of short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda) populations in old-field habitats
resolves10.1002/ab.90018
The influence of competitive status (winner/loser) on the behavior of male rats in three models of anxiety
resolves10.2307/1383180
Behavioral Mechanisms of Coexistence in Sympatric Species of Desert Rodents, Dipodomys ordii and D. merriami
resolves10.1007/BF00165833
Inter-specific variation in anti-predator behavior in sympatric species of kangaroo rat
resolves10.4098/AT.arch.97-37
Differences in foraging behaviour between water shrews: Neomys anomalus and Neomys fodiens
resolves10.1093/beheco/13.2.216
Prey size, prey nutrition, and food handling by shrews of different body sizes
resolves10.1007/BF03192480
Species richness, relative abundances and habitat use in local assemblages ofSorex shrews in Eurasian boreal forests
resolves10.5962/p.355589
Noncompetitive coexistence between Peromyscus species and Clethrionomys gapperi
resolves10.1093/beheco/14.1.127
Evolution of fighting behavior under asymmetric competition: an experimental test with juvenile salmonids
The 31 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAndéra M. 1993. Distribution of the Miller’s water shrewNeomys anomalus in Czechoslovakia. Folia Musei Rerum Naturalium Bohemiae Occidentalis, Zoologica 37: 1–37.
no DOI — not checkedArcher J. 1988. The behavioural biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1–257.
no DOI — not checkedBaxter R. M. and Irwin D. 1995. A laboratory study of agonistic behaviour in the red musk shrew,Crocidura flavescens (Geoffroy I. 1827). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 60: 193–205.
no DOI — not checkedChurchfield S. 1990. The natural history of shrews. Christopher Helm (Publishers) Ltd., Bromley: 1–178.
no DOI — not checkedChurchfield S. 1991. Niche dynamics, food resources, and feeding strategies in multispecies communities of shrews. [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J. S. Findley and T. L. Yates, eds]. Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 23–34.
no DOI — not checkedChurchfield S. and Rychlik L. (in press). Dietary overlap and niche partitioning in four shrew species co-existing in marshland in Białowieża Forest, eastern Poland. Journal od Zoology, London.
no DOI — not checkedDempster E. R. and Perrin M. R. 1990. Interspecific aggression in sympatricGerbillurusspecies. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 55: 392–398.
no DOI — not checkedFeldhamer G. A., Drickamer L. C., Vessey S. H. and Merritt J. F. 1999. Mammalogy: adaptation, diversity, and ecology. WBC/McGraw-Hill, Boston: 1–563.
no DOI — not checkedGould E. 1969. Communication in three genera of shrews (Soricidae):Suncus, Blarina andCryptotis. Communications in Behavioral Biology, Part A 3: 11–31.
no DOI — not checkedHanski I. 1985. What does a shrew do in an energy crisis? [In: Behavioural ecology. Ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. The 25th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Reading 1984. R. M. Sibly and R. H. Smith, eds]. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 247–252.
no DOI — not checkedHanski I. 1994. Population biological consequences of body size inSorex. [In: Advances in the biology of shrews. J. F. Merritt, G. L. Kirkland Jr and R. K. Rose, eds]. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh 18: 15–26.
no DOI — not checkedJohannesen E., Brudevoll J., Jenstad M., Korslund L. and Kristoffersen S. 2002. Behavioural dominance of grey-sided voles over bank voles in dyadic encounters. Annales Zoologici Fennici 39: 43–47.
no DOI — not checkedKalinin A. A., Shchipanov N. A. and Demidova T. B. 1998. Behaviour of four species of shrewsSorex isodon, S. araneus, S. caecutiens, andS. minutus (Insectivora, Soricidae) in interspecific contacts. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 77: 838–849. [In Russian with English summary]
no DOI — not checkedKirkland G. L. Jr 1991. Competition and coexistence in shrews (Insectivora: Soricidae). [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J. S. Findley and T. L. Yates, eds].Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 15–22.
no DOI — not checkedKorpimäki E. and Norrdahl K. 1989. Avian and mammalian predators of shrews in Europe: regional differences, between-year and seasonal variation, and mortality due to predation. Annales Zoologici Fennici 26: 389–400.
no DOI — not checkedMcNab B. K. 1991. The energy expenditure of shrews. [In: The biology of the Soricidae. J. S. Findley and T. L. Yates, eds]. Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque: 35–45.
no DOI — not checkedMichalak I. 1982. Reproduction, maternal and social behaviour of Mediterranean water shrew under laboratory conditions. Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 30: 307–310.
no DOI — not checkedMovchan V. N. and Shibkov A. A. 1981. [On the significance of some acoustic signals in the behaviour of insectivores]. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta 1981(2): 73–76. [In Russian with English summary]
no DOI — not checkedMovchan V. N. and Shibkov A. A. 1982. Structural patterns of acoustic signals in shrews (Soricidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 61: 1695–1705. [In Russian with English summary]
no DOI — not checkedMovchan V. N. and Shibkov A. A. 1987. Recognition by shrews of the intraspecific communicational signals and their synthetised models. Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta Ser. 3, 1: 57–64. [In Russian with English summary]
no DOI — not checkedMoynihan M. 1998. The social regulation of competition and aggression in animals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington: 1–158.
no DOI — not checkedPoduschka W. 1977. Insectivore communication. [In: How animals communicate. T. A. Seboek, ed]. Indiana University Press, Bloomington: 600–633.
no DOI — not checkedRychlik L. 1998. Evolution of social systems in shrews. [In: Evolution of shrews. J. M. Wójcik and M. Wolsan, eds]. Mammal Research Institute, Białowieża: 347–406.
no DOI — not checkedRychlik L. 2001. Habitat preferences of water shrews and root vole coexisting along a stream in Białowieża Forest. Säugetierkundliche Informationen 5 (25): 99–112.
no DOI — not checkedRychlik L. and Jancewicz E. 1998. Prey preferences and foraging behaviour in semi-aquatic and terrestrial shrews — cafeteria test. [In: Abstracts of the Euro-American Mammal Congress, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 19–24 July, 1998. S. Reig, ed]. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela: 186.
no DOI — not checkedSchröpfer R. 1990. The structure of European small mammal communities. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere 117: 355–367.
no DOI — not checkedShchipanov N. A., Kalinin A. A., Oleinichenko V. Yu. and Demidova T. B. 1998. General behavioral characteristics of shrews. Russian Journal of Zoology 2: 300–312.
no DOI — not checkedShchipanov N. A. and Oleinichenko V. Yu. 1993. [The bicoloured white-toothed shrew. The behaviour and spatial, ethological and functional structure of a population]. Nauka, Moskva: 1–136. [In Russian]
no DOI — not checkedSokal R. R. and Rohlf F. J. 1995. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York: 1–859.
no DOI — not checkedTaylor J. R. E. 1998. Evolution of energetic strategies in shrews. [In: Evolution of shrews. J. Wójcik M. and M. Wolsan, eds]. Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża: 309–346.
no DOI — not checkedZwolak R. and Rychlik L. 2004. Does the reduction of locomotor activity serve as an aggression avoidance mechanism in shrews (Soricidae)? Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, Biology 7(2) http://www.ejpau.media.pl/series/volume7/issue2/biology/art-06.html.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf03192627"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf03192627/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/bf03192627)