Reference health
Prospective meta-analysis using individual patient data in intensive care medicine
69/69 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 69 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa010307
Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa040232
A Comparison of Albumin and Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in the Intensive Care Unit
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa067514
Saline or Albumin for Fluid Resuscitation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury
resolves10.1007/s001340051117
Antibiotic prophylaxis in intensive care units: meta-analyses versus clinical practice
resolves10.1186/1741-7015-5-32
A meta-analysis of N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: unsupervised clustering to resolve heterogeneity
resolves10.1186/1471-2288-5-14
The strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data
resolves10.1191/1740774505cn087oa
Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials: a review of methods used in practice
resolves10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00414-0
A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis
resolves10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.001
Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07285-9
Albumin and hypovolaemia: is the Cochrane evidence to be trusted?
resolves10.1002/sim.1096
Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models
resolves10.1056/NEJMsr077003
Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials
resolves10.1136/bmj.326.7387.472
Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses
resolves10.1002/sim.1023
Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head
resolves10.1002/sim.4780141902
Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient data
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971215)16:23<2741::AID-SIM703>3.0.CO;2-0
Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis
resolves10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00152-0
Individual Patient- versus Literature-Based Meta-analysis of Survival Data
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981230)17:24<2815::AID-SIM110>3.0.CO;2-8
Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints
resolves10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.x
The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care
resolves10.1016/0140-6736(93)93004-K
Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?
resolves10.1001/jama.1995.03530100070037
A Comparison of Meta-analytic Results Using Literature vs Individual Patient Data
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009051
Comparison of Effect Estimates from a Meta-Analysis of Summary Data from Published Studies and from a Meta-Analysis Using Individual Patient Data for Ovarian Cancer Studies
resolves10.1136/bmj.316.7140.1275
Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in critically ill adult patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
resolves10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00105-7
Meta-analysis of published studies or meta-analysis of individual data? Caesarean section in HIV-positive women as a study case
resolves10.1081/BIP-120024209
Exploring the Relationship Between Surrogates and Clinical Outcomes: Analysis of Individual Patient Data vs. Meta-regression on Group-Level Summary Statistics
resolves10.1002/bjs.4467
Value of updating a systematic review in surgery using individual patient data
resolves10.2307/2534018
Comparison of Meta-Analysis Versus Analysis of Variance of Individual Patient Data
resolves10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.01221.x
On the Equivalence of Meta‐Analysis Using Literature and Using Individual Patient Data
resolves10.1002/14651858.MR000007.pub2
Individual patient data meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses based on aggregate data
resolves10.1002/1097-0258(20001230)19:24<3417::AID-SIM614>3.0.CO;2-L
A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes
resolves10.1136/bmj.310.6971.13
Meta-analysis of efficacy of quinine for treatment of nocturnal leg cramps in elderly people
resolves10.1093/aje/kwm341
Comparison of Methods of Handling Missing Data in Individual Patient Data Meta-analyses: An Empirical Example on Antibiotics in Children with Acute Otitis Media
resolves10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00073-8
Effect of active compression–decompression resuscitation (ACD-CPR) on survival: a combined analysis using individual patient data
resolves10.1186/1471-2431-9-33
Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis
resolves10.1097/01.CCM.0000153410.87750.53
Hypothermia for neuroprotection after cardiac arrest: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
resolves10.1016/S0197-2456(97)00051-2
Cumulating evidence from randomized trials: Utilizing sequential monitoring boundaries for cumulative meta-analysis
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0
Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials
resolves10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80482-2
Prospective meta-analysis of cholesterol-lowering studies: The prospective pravastatin pooling (PPP) project and the cholesterol treatment trialists (CTT) collaboration
resolves10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010491
A new challenge in clinical research in childhood ALL: The prospective meta-analysis strategy for intergroup collaboration
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00559.x
An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event outcomes
resolves10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17790-3
Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit?
resolves10.1017/S0266462308080471
Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses
resolves10.1002/pst.123
The relationship between osteoporotic fracture risk and a surrogate: Apparent discrepancies between analyses based on individual patient data and summary statistics
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa0802639
Intensity of Renal Support in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
resolves10.1056/NEJMoa070716
Intensive Insulin Therapy and Pentastarch Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis
resolves10.1097/00005373-199705001-00011
Individual Patient Cohort Analysis of the Efficacy of Hypertonic Saline/Dextran in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Hypotension
resolves10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb05509.x
Efficacy of hypertonic saline dextran (HSD) in patients with traumatic hypotension: meta‐analysis of individual patient data
resolves10.1053/euhj.2000.2476
Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials
resolves10.3171/jns.2003.99.4.0666
Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury: an analysis of 5600 patients
resolves10.1093/eurheartj/ehi268
Temporal trends on the risk of arrhythmic vs. non-arrhythmic deaths in high-risk patients after myocardial infarction: a combined analysis from multicentre trials
resolves10.1089/neu.2006.0035
Multivariable Prognostic Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from The IMPACT Study
resolves10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a091b
Effect of dopexamine infusion on mortality following major surgery: Individual patient data meta-regression analysis of published clinical trials
resolves10.1001/archinte.159.11.1248
A Metaregression Analysis of the Dose-Response Effect of Aspirin on Stroke
resolves10.1160/TH03-02-0086
Optimal low-molecular-weight heparin regimen in major orthopaedic surgery
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedWunsch H, Angus DC (2006) International comparisons of intensive care: understanding the differences. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine. Springer, Berlin, pp 787–793
no DOI — not checkedOrford NR, Faulkner C, Flintoff W, Eddey D, Lamb-Jenkins J, Henry M, Corke C, Stow P, Green D (2008) Implementation and outcomes of a severe sepsis protocol in an Australian tertiary hospital. Crit Care Resusc 10:217–224
no DOI — not checkedSoni N (1998) Human albumin administration in critically ill patients. Validity of review methods must be assessed. BMJ 317:883–884
no DOI — not checkedHiggins JP, Green S (2006) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane library. Wiley, Chichester
no DOI — not checkedGhersi D, Simes J, Berlin JA (1999) Cochrane Collaboration—Prospective Meta-Analysis Methods Group. http://www.cochrane.org/docs/pma.htm . 17 May 2007
no DOI — not checkedAugmented vs. normal renal replacement therapy in severe acute renal failure (ARF). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00221013 (2008)
no DOI — not checkedNormoglycaemia in intensive care evaluation and survival using glucose algorithm regulation (NICE—SUGAR STUDY). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00220987 (2008)
no DOI — not checkedGlucontrol study: comparing the effects of two glucose control regimens by insulin in intensive care unit patients. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui/show/NCT00107601 (2008)
no DOI — not checkedProtocolized Care for Early Septic Shock (ProCESS). http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00510835 (2008)
no DOI — not checkedThe Australian Resuscitation in Sepsis Evaluation. http://www.anzicrc.monash.org/process.html (2008)
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00134-009-1650-x"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00134-009-1650-x/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00134-009-1650-x)