Reference health

A generalised model of judgment aggregation

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y
CiteStamped reference-health badge
14/14 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 14 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0144-8188(01)00056-4
Collective coherence?☆
resolves10.1093/ojls/18.2.293
More easily done than said: rules, reasons and rational social choice
resolves10.1177/1470594X02001003004
Rational Aggregation
resolves10.2307/796436
Unpacking the Court
resolves10.1002/malq.19630090502
Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi
resolves10.1016/S0165-4896(02)00089-6
A possibility theorem on aggregation over multiple interconnected propositions
resolves10.1007/s00355-003-0253-7
The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
resolves10.1017/S0003055404001303
A Model of Path-Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions
resolves10.1017/S0266267102001098
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result
resolves10.1023/B:SYNT.0000029950.50517.59
Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared1
resolves10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00118-6
Arrow’s theorem as a corollary
resolves10.1111/j.1758-2237.2001.tb00047.x
Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma
resolves10.1007/BF00253912
Conditional obligation and counterfactuals
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(75)90062-9
On the theory of aggregation
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBovens L, Rabinowicz W (2004) Democratic answers to complex questions – an epistemic perspective. Synthese (forthcoming)
no DOI — not checkedDietrich F (2004) Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems. J Econ Theory (forthcoming)
no DOI — not checkedDietrich F (2005) The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas. Working paper, University of Konstanz
no DOI — not checkedDietrich F, List C (2004a) Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Working paper, London School of Economics
no DOI — not checkedDietrich F, List C (2004b) A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation. Working paper, London School of Economics
no DOI — not checkedDietrich F, List C (2005) Judgment aggregation by Quota Rules. Working paper, London School of Economics
no DOI — not checkedDokow E, Holzman R (2005) Aggregation of binary relations. Working paper, Technion Israel Institute of Technology
no DOI — not checkedGärdenfors P (2004) An arrow-like theorem for voting with logical consequences. Working paper, Lund University
no DOI — not checkedGekker R (2003) A probability-based doxastic logic. Working paper, Department of Economics, NUI, Galway
no DOI — not checkedHintikka J (1971) Some main problems of deontic logic. In: Hilpinen R (eds). Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 59–104
no DOI — not checkedLewis D (1973) Counterfactuals. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
no DOI — not checkedMendelssohn E (1979) Introduction to mathematical logic. D. Van Nostrand
no DOI — not checkedMongin P (2005) Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation. Working paper, CNRS, Paris
no DOI — not checkedNehring K, Puppe C (2002) Strategy-proof social choice on single-peaked domains: possibility, impossibility and the space between. Working paper, University of California at Davies
no DOI — not checkedNehring K, Puppe C (2004) Consistent judgement aggregation: a characterization. Working paper, University of Karlsruhe
no DOI — not checkedPauly M, van Hees M (2004) Logical constraints on judgment aggregation. J Philos Logic (forthcoming)
no DOI — not checkedPigozzi G (2004) Collective decision-making without paradoxes: an argument-based account. Working paper, King’s College, London
no DOI — not checkedPriest G (2001) An introduction to non-classical logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
no DOI — not checkedStalnaker R (1968): A theory of conditionals. In: Rescher N. (eds). Studies in logical theory. Blackwell, Oxford
no DOI — not checkedvan Hees M (2004) The limits of epistemic democracy. Working paper, University of Groningen
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00355-006-0187-y)