Reference health

Cancer survivors’ perceived need for supportive care and their attitude towards self-management and eHealth

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7
CiteStamped reference-health badge
42/42 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-22

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

3 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 42 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1007/s00520-009-0615-5
What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review
resolves10.1007/s00520-012-1450-7
A systematic review of unmet needs of newly diagnosed older cancer patients undergoing active cancer treatment
resolves10.5993/AJHB.34.1.9
Need for Health Behavior Interventions for Young Adult Cancer Survivors
resolves10.3322/caac.20093
Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness
resolves10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6081
Cost of Cancer Care: Issues and Implications
resolves10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1715
Centralization of Cancer Surgery: Implications for Patient Access to Optimal Care
resolves10.1080/10810730500265609
Exploring e-Health Usage and Interest Among Cancer Information Service Users: The Need for Personalized Interactions and Multiple Channels Remains
resolves10.1002/pon.1993
Internet interventions for improving psychological well‐being in psycho‐oncology: review and recommendations
resolves10.2196/jmir.2281
A Systematic Review of Web-Based Interventions for Patient Empowerment and Physical Activity in Chronic Diseases: Relevance for Cancer Survivors
resolves10.2196/jmir.2533
Partnership for Health-2, A Web-Based Versus Print Smoking Cessation Intervention for Childhood and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
resolves10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.014
Outcomes of online support and resources for cancer survivors: A systematic literature review
resolves10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.12.007
Self-Management and Transitions in Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
resolves10.1188/12.ONF.354-360
One Step at a Time: Self-Management and Transitions Among Women With Ovarian Cancer
resolves10.2196/jmir.1718
Determinants of Engagement in Face-to-Face and Online Patient Support Groups
resolves10.1007/s00520-008-0419-z
Internet use by cancer survivors: current use and future wishes
resolves10.1186/1472-6947-12-96
A dialogue-based web application enhances personalized access to healthcare professionals – an intervention study
resolves10.1186/1471-2407-12-150
Prevalence and correlates of cancer survivors’ supportive care needs 6 months after diagnosis: a population-based cross-sectional study
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000101)88:1<226::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-P
The unmet supportive care needs of patients with cancer
resolves10.1038/sj.bjc.6604406
Supportive care needs of men living with prostate cancer in England: a survey
resolves10.1007/s00520-011-1214-9
Unmet supportive care needs in colorectal cancer: differences by age
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2354.2001.00280.x
The psychosocial needs of cancer patients: findings from an observational study
resolves10.1002/pon.2069
Care needs after primary breast cancer treatment. Survivors' associated sociodemographic and medical characteristics
resolves10.1016/j.ejon.2012.02.003
Factors associated with supportive care needs of patients under treatment for breast cancer
resolves10.1002/pon.3323
The prevalence and correlates of supportive care needs in testicular cancer survivors: a cross‐sectional study
resolves10.1200/JCO.2006.09.8046
Age, Health, and Education Determine Supportive Care Needs of Men Younger Than 70 Years With Prostate Cancer
resolves10.1093/annonc/mdt128
Assessment of needs, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with care in breast cancer patients to better target supportive care
resolves10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00125.x
The physical and psycho-social experiences of patients attending an outpatient medical oncology department: a cross-sectional study
resolves10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.007
An integrative review of supportive e-health programs in cancer care
resolves10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.01.012
Computerized prospective screening for high levels of emotional distress in head and neck cancer patients and referral rate to psychosocial care
resolves10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.12.005
Prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life in long-term oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors and the perceived need for supportive care
resolves10.1007/s11764-013-0289-3
Health-related quality of life, lifestyle behaviors, and intervention preferences of survivors of childhood cancer
resolves10.3109/0284186X.2010.529822
Updated evidence in support of diet and exercise interventions in cancer survivors
resolves10.1200/JCO.2012.42.0638
Lifestyle Factors in Cancer Survivorship
resolves10.1016/j.clnu.2013.10.019
Randomized trial of the effects of individual nutritional counseling in cancer patients
resolves10.1177/1049732312470567
Cancer Patients’ Experiences of the Early Phase of Individual Counseling in an Outpatient Psycho-Oncology Setting
resolves10.1186/1471-244X-13-296
Motivation to persist with internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment using blended care: a qualitative study
resolves10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.038
E-mail in patient–provider communication: A systematic review
resolves10.2196/jmir.1672
A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies
resolves10.1245/s10434-013-3375-x
Relation Between Age, Comorbidity, and Complications in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer
resolves10.1007/s11606-007-0313-2
Beyond Comorbidity Counts: How Do Comorbidity Type and Severity Influence Diabetes Patients’ Treatment Priorities and Self-Management?
resolves10.2196/jmir.2285
How User Characteristics Affect Use Patterns in Web-Based Illness Management Support for Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer
resolves10.2196/jmir.1840
Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Measure What it Intends to Measure? Validation of a Dutch Version of the eHEALS in Two Adult Populations
The 3 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedSchäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Devillé W, et al (2010) The Netherlands: Health Syst Rev 2010. Report No.: 12
no DOI — not checkedLamers LM, Stalmeier PFM, McDonnell J, Krabbe PFM, van Busschbach JJ (2005) Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 149:1574–1578
no DOI — not checkedVerweij A (RIVM) Onderwijsdeelname: Indeling opleidingsniveau. Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid Bilthoven: RIVM, 2008
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-22 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s00520-014-2514-7)