Reference health
Third party logistics (3PL) selection for cold chain management: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach
80/80 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
19 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 80 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.01.004
Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach
resolves10.1080/03081070310001633581
A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection
resolves10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.041
A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology
resolves10.1177/095440540421801213
Development of the supplier selection model—a case study in the advanced technology industry
resolves10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
resolves10.1016/j.asoc.2006.11.007
Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives
resolves10.1108/09600030810882825
Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e‐commerce market
resolves10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.084
Leveraging the supply chain flexibility of third party logistics – Hybrid knowledge-based system approach
resolves10.1142/S0218488502001739
FACILITY LOCATION SELECTION USING FUZZY TOPSIS UNDER GROUP DECISIONS
resolves10.1016/j.tifs.2008.03.006
Refrigeration and cold chain serving the global food industry and creating a better future: two key IIR challenges for improved health and environment
resolves10.1016/j.ins.2007.10.016
Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management
resolves10.1108/BIJ-04-2013-0039
Benchmarking the interactions among barriers in third-party logistics implementation
resolves10.1016/j.cie.2007.07.009
A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness
resolves10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00003-X
Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios
resolves10.1002/j.2158-1592.2005.tb00196.x
LOGISTICS INNOVATION: A CUSTOMER VALUE-ORIENTED SOCIAL PROCESS
resolves10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.233
Logistics Enterprise Evaluation Model Based On Fuzzy Clustering Analysis
resolves10.1108/13598540710826290
Third‐party logistics provider selection: insights from a Turkish automotive company
resolves10.1108/14635771111109869
Selection of third‐party reverse logistics provider using fuzzy extent analysis
resolves10.1016/j.eswa.2008.03.013
Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology
resolves10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.09.005
Effects of controlled freezing-point storage at 0°C on quality of green bean as compared with cold and room-temperature storages
resolves10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.009
Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach
resolves10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.01.002
Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings
resolves10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.011
Application of a hybrid intelligent decision support model in logistics outsourcing
resolves10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.005
Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach
resolves10.1016/S0925-5273(97)00014-5
Identifying investment opportunities for advanced manufacturing systems with comparative-integrated performance measurement
resolves10.1108/17465661211283287
A fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methodology to evaluate 3PL in a supply chain
resolves10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01323.x
Overview of RFID Technology and Its Applications in the Food Industry
resolves10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.08.007
Developing an advanced Multi-Temperature Joint Distribution System for the food cold chain
resolves10.1108/09600031111175807
Customer‐specific adaptation by providers and their perception of 3PL‐relationship success
resolves10.1504/IJMTM.2007.011398
Efficient knowledge integration to support a complex supply network management
resolves10.1108/19355181200400013
Third-Party Warehousing Selection: A Comparison of National and Regional Firms
resolves10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.03.010
Maintaining a cold chain from purchase to the home and at home: Consumer opinions
resolves10.1016/j.autcon.2008.03.005
Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method
resolves10.1108/14635770910987823
Evaluation of third‐party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two‐phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology
resolves10.1108/09600031111138826
ICT for logistics and freight transportation: a literature review and research agenda
resolves10.1108/13555850810864579
An integrated model to identify and classify the key criteria and their role in the assessment of 3PL services providers
resolves10.1108/00070700810906642
Consumer perceptions of food quality and safety and their relation to traceability
resolves10.1007/s10479-016-2332-z
Cold chain configuration design: location-allocation decision-making using coordination, value deterioration, and big data approximation
resolves10.1080/21681015.2014.999723
Selecting competitive supply chain using fuzzy AHP and extent analysis
resolves10.1108/15982681111140516
Analyzing the interaction of factors for success of total quality management in SMEs
resolves10.1504/IJENM.2008.018780
Implementation of information technology: evidence from Indian SMEs
resolves10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066
A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods
resolves10.1080/16258312.2005.11517137
Selection of Third-Party Logistics (3PL): A Hybrid Approach Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP)
resolves10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.07.001
Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process
resolves10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.021
Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives
resolves10.1108/09600031011020377
Environmental impacts as buying criteria for third party logistical services
resolves10.1108/09600030810875373
Evaluating the comparative efficiency of Chinese third‐party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis
The 19 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAguezzoul, A. (2008). A preliminary analysis on third-party logistics selection. In 7th International Meeting for Research in Logistics AVIGNON (pp. 24–26).
no DOI — not checkedBowersox, D. J., & Closs, D. J. (1996). Logistical management: The integrated supply chain process. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
no DOI — not checkedChristopher, M. (2011). Logistic & supply chain management (4th ed.). Cambridge: Pearson Education Limited.
no DOI — not checkedDubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. New York: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedGupta, R., Sachdeva, A., & Bhardwaj, A., (2010). Selection of 3PL service provider using integrated fuzzy delphi and fuzzy TOPSIS. In Proceedings World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 20–22 October, San Francisco.
no DOI — not checkedKaufmann, A., & Gupta, M. M. (1991). Introduction to fuzzy arithmetic: Theory and applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
no DOI — not checkedLeahy, S. E., Murphy, P. R., & Poist, R. F. (1995). Determinants of successful logistical relationships: A third party provider perspective. Transportation Journal, 35(2), 5–13.
no DOI — not checkedMelnyk, A. S., Davis, E. W., Spekman, R. E., & Sandor, J. (2010). Outcome-driven supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 33–38.
no DOI — not checkedMenon, M., McGinnis, M., & Ackerman, K. (1998). Selection criteria for providers of third-party logistics services: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Logistics, 19(1), 121–137.
no DOI — not checkedPorter, E. M., & Kramer, R. M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
no DOI — not checkedPWC. (2007). Farm to retail—overview of India’s retail sector. In Indo-US Economic Summit (pp. 12–26). www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/50e7c984c1feebe5ca25739f0023b7e7/$file/buidingstongpartnership.pdf .
no DOI — not checkedSangam, V. K. (2004). Global logistics outsourcing trends: Challenges in managing 3PL relationship. Palmerston: Massey University.
no DOI — not checkedSoh, H. (2010). A decision model for evaluating third party logistics provider using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. African Journal of Business Management, 4(3), 339–349.
no DOI — not checkedTroyer, C., & Cooper, R. (1995). Smart moves in supply chain integration. Transportation and Distribution, 36(9), 55–62.
no DOI — not checkedUNCTAD. (2006). Report of the Expert Meeting on ICT Solutions to Facilitate Trade at Border Crossings and Ports, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.
no DOI — not checkedVorst, J. G., & Van der, A. G. (2000). Effective food supply chains generating, modeling and evaluating supply chain scenarios. Dutch: Wageningen University.
no DOI — not checkedYan, G. E. (2009). Evaluation on competitiveness of TPL enterprises based on AHP and genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology.
no DOI — not checkedZang, J. (2009). The research of 3PLs provider selection based on rough set and PSO. In Proceeding of the IITA International Conference on Services Science, Management and Engineering.
no DOI — not checkedZokaee, S., Jabbarzadeh, A, Fahimnia, B, Sadjadi, S. J. (2014). Robust supply chain network design: an optimization model with real world application. In Annals of Operations Research, November (pp. 1–30).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10479-017-2591-3"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10479-017-2591-3/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10479-017-2591-3)