Reference health

Empirical fragility curves for Italian URM buildings

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00845-9
CiteStamped reference-health badge
1 of 37 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-10

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

9 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.13117/gemglobal-seismic-risk-map-2018
The 36 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1080/13632469.2018.1469439
An Unbiased Estimation of Empirical Lognormal Fragility Functions with Uncertainties on the Ground Motion Intensity Measure
resolves10.1007/s11069-014-1118-3
Empirical fragility assessment of buildings affected by the 2011 Great East Japan tsunami using improved statistical models
resolves10.1007/s11069-015-1734-6
Seismic risk assessment and hazard mapping in Nepal
resolves10.1007/s10518-008-9100-7
A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy
resolves10.1007/BF01890115
Efficient algorithms for agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods
resolves10.1007/s10518-016-0026-1
Empirical fragility curves from damage data on RC buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake
resolves10.1007/s10518-005-0202-1
New Developments in Seismic Risk Assessment in Italy
resolves10.1007/s10518-015-9723-4
Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake
resolves10.1023/A:1024809511362
Earthquake Damage Scenarios of the Building Stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) Including Site Effects
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.009
Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies
resolves10.12989/eas.2013.4.3.299
Evaluation of damage probability matrices from observational seismic damage data
resolves10.1007/s40091-016-0118-9
Urban seismic risk assessment: statistical repair cost data and probable structural losses based on damage scenario—correlation analysis
resolves10.1007/BF02857534
Earthquake risk assessment for Istanbul metropolitan area
resolves10.7712/120119.7024.18852
ITALIAN PLATFORM FOR SEISMIC RISK AND DAMAGE SCENARIO EVALUATION
resolves10.1193/1.1769373
Building Inspection and Damage Data for the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake
resolves10.1007/s10518-018-0413-x
Empirical seismic vulnerability assessment of Icelandic buildings affected by the 2000 sequence of earthquakes
resolves10.1007/s10518-010-9231-5
Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the August 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, Earthquake
resolves10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z
Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings
resolves10.1002/eqe.2522
Statistical procedures for developing earthquake damage fragility curves
resolves10.1007/s11069-013-0685-z
Probabilistic earthquake risk assessment using CAPRA: application to the city of Barcelona, Spain
resolves10.1785/gssrl.79.5.688
Shakemap Implementation in Italy
resolves10.1007/s10518-006-9020-3
Presentation of RISK-UE Project
resolves10.1785/0220130087
OpenQuake Engine: An Open Hazard (and Risk) Software for the Global Earthquake Model
resolves10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9
Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data
resolves10.1007/s10518-017-0161-3
Comparison of PSH results with historical macroseismic observations at different scales. Part 2: application to South-East France
resolves10.1007/s10518-018-0352-6
Damage classification and derivation of damage probability matrices from L’Aquila (2009) post-earthquake survey data
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105870
Influence of seismic input characterisation on empirical damage probability matrices for the 2009 L'Aquila event
resolves10.1007/s10518-017-0157-z
Comparison of PSH results with historical macroseismic observations at different scales. Part 1: methodology
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.010
Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves
resolves10.1193/1.3609850
Typological Seismic Risk Maps for Italy
resolves10.1007/s10518-014-9630-0
Seismic risk assessment for mainland Portugal
resolves10.1007/s10518-017-0287-3
Seismic risk assessment at urban scale from 3D physics-based numerical modeling: the case of Thessaloniki
resolves10.1785/0120100130
Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian Building Code
resolves10.5194/nhess-6-573-2006
Seismic risk mapping for Germany
resolves10.1007/s10518-010-9233-3
Seismic vulnerability and risk assessment: case study of the historic city centre of Coimbra, Portugal
resolves10.3133/tm12A1
ShakeMap manual: technical manual, user's guide, and software guide
The 9 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBraga F., Dolce M., Liberatore D. (1982) A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 scale. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on earthquale engineering, Athens, Greece
no DOI — not checkedCensus Data (2001) http://dawinci.istat.it/jsp/MD/dawinciMD.jsp
no DOI — not checkedDolce M, Speranza E, Giordano F, Borzi B, Bocchi F, Conte C, Di Meo A, Faravelli M, Pascale V (2019) Observed damage database of past Italian earthquakes: the DaDO WebGIS. Boll Geofis Teor Appl 60(2):141–164
no DOI — not checkedGrünthal G (ed.), Musson RMW, Schwarz J, Stucchi M (1998) European Macroseismic Scale. Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Vol 15-European Macroseismic Scale 1998. European Centre for Geodynamics and Seismology, Luxembourg
no DOI — not checkedLucantoni A, Bosi V, Bramerini F, De Marco R, Lo PT, Naso G, Sabetta F (2001) Seismic risk in Italy. Ing Sismica, XVII 1:5–36 (in Italian)
no DOI — not checkedNational Department of Civil Protection (NDCP, ed., 2018) National risk assessment: overview of the potential major disasters in Italy http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/documents/20182/823803/Documento+sulla+Valutazione+nazionale+dei+rischi/57f337fd-a421-4cb0-b04c-234b61997a2f
no DOI — not checkedRossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013) Existing empirical vulnerability and fragility functions: Compendium and guide for selection. GEM Technical Report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy
no DOI — not checkedSabetta F, Goretti A, Lucantoni A (1998) Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference earthquake engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam
no DOI — not checkedStucchi M, Akinci A, Faccioli E, Gasperini P, Malagnini L, Meletti C, Montaldo V, Valensise G, (2004) Mappa di Pericolosità sismica del territorio Nazionale http://zonesismiche.mi.ingv.it/documenti/rapporto_conclusivo.pdf (in Italian)
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-020-00845-9"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-020-00845-9/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-020-00845-9/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-020-00845-9)