Reference health

A simplified component-based methodology for the seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings using nonlinear static procedures: application to RC school buildings

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01445-5
CiteStamped reference-health badge
2 of 52 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-10

At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.

35 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

References needing attention

does not resolve to a known work10.1007/ssll803-013-0154-4
does not resolve to a known work10.13117/GEM.VULN-MOD.TR2014.12
The 50 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00290.x
A cluster‐based decision support system for estimating earthquake damage and casualties
resolves10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000215
Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection
resolves10.1007/s10518-011-9252-8
Assessing the seismic response of existing RC buildings using the extended N2 method
resolves10.1007/s10518-010-9199-1
Comparison between non-linear dynamic and static seismic analysis of structures according to European and US provisions
resolves10.1007/s11069-017-2865-8
Seismic damage to schools subjected to Nepal earthquakes, 2015
resolves10.1002/eqe.144
A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings
resolves10.1193/031618EQS061M
A Methodology for Evaluating Component‐Level Loss Predictions of the FEMA P‐58 Seismic Performance Assessment Procedure
resolves10.1533/9780857098986.3.334
Assessing the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings
resolves10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101446
Resilient communities through safer schools
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.031
Development and urban-scale application of a simplified method for seismic fragility assessment of RC buildings
resolves10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.020
Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter?
resolves10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001926
Macroelement Model for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Responses of Masonry Infills in Frame Structures
resolves10.1080/15732479.2011.574813
Simplified method for seismic risk assessment of buildings with consideration of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty
resolves10.1002/eqe.411
Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.01.001
The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame — a deterministic assessment
resolves10.1139/L04-040
Modelling failures in existing reinforced concrete columns
resolves10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001579
Seismic Collapse Risk Assessment of Reinforced Masonry Walls with Boundary Elements Using the FEMA P695 Methodology
resolves10.1193/1.1586128
A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance‐Based Seismic Design
resolves10.18118/G6JD46
Geotechnical Engineering Reconnaissance of the 19 September 2017 Mw 7.1 Puebla-Mexico City Earthquake
resolves10.1061/9780784413609.168
Investigating the Use of Record-to-Record Variability in Static Capacity Approaches
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109548
Out-of-plane closed-form solution for the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry schools in Nepal
resolves10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001221
Seismic Safety Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Walls through FEMA P695 Methodology
resolves10.1007/s10518-020-00938-5
Event-based assessment of seismic resilience in Mexican school buildings
resolves10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.012
Developing an adaptive global exposure model to support the generation of country disaster risk profiles
resolves10.1002/eqe.605
Approximate incremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.013
Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes
resolves10.1002/eqe.495
Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration
resolves10.1007/s10518-011-9319-6
The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.07.032
Extension of N2 method to plan irregular buildings considering accidental eccentricity
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
Theoretical Stress‐Strain Model for Confined Concrete
resolves10.1023/B:BEEE.0000021426.31223.60
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Gravity Load Designed R/C Frames
resolves10.1007/s10518-014-9585-1
Simplified non-linear seismic displacement demand prediction for low period structures
resolves10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:4(417)
Approximate Seismic Lateral Deformation Demands in Multistory Buildings
resolves10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:6(840)
Generalized Interstory Drift Spectrum
resolves10.1193/040412EQS151T
Prioritizing Interventions to Reduce Seismic Vulnerability in School Facilities in Colombia
resolves10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7
Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings
resolves10.1002/eqe.148
Generic frame model for simulation of earthquake responses of steel moment frames
resolves10.1193/1.1516201
Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables
resolves10.1193/1.3158547
Socioeconomic Clustering in Seismic Risk Assessment of Urban Housing Stock
resolves10.1007/s11803-019-0506-9
Evaluation of the fishbone model in simulating the seismic response of multistory reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames
resolves10.1002/eqe.1100
Evaluation of three‐dimensional modal pushover analysis for unsymmetric‐plan buildings subjected to two components of ground motion
resolves10.1061/9780784413609.167
Sensitivity Analysis of Different Capacity Spectrum Approaches to Assumptions in the Modeling, Capacity and Demand Representations
resolves10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101807
A prioritization RVS methodology for the seismic risk assessment of RC school buildings
resolves10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105844
Seismic resilience evaluation based on vulnerability curves for existing and retrofitted typical RC school buildings
resolves10.1193/013018EQS031M
Uncertainty and Correlation in Seismic Vulnerability Functions of Building Classes
resolves10.1007/s10518-021-01061-9
Classification and seismic fragility assessment of confined masonry school buildings
resolves10.1002/eqe.141
Incremental dynamic analysis
resolves10.1785/0120060267
Topographic Slope as a Proxy for Seismic Site Conditions and Amplification
resolves10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.007
Seismic and wind vulnerability assessment for the GAR-13 global risk assessment
resolves10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.013
Probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings in terms of economic losses
The 35 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedACI (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–14). American Concrete Institute, USA
no DOI — not checkedAdhikari RK (2021) A methodological framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry school buildings: application to Nepal (doctoral dissertation). University College London
no DOI — not checkedASCE, SEI (2017a) ASCE 7-16: minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures. Am Soc Civ Eng
no DOI — not checkedASCE, SEI (2017b) ASCE/SEI 41-17: American society of civil engineers, seismic evaluation and retrofi t of existing buildings. Am Soc Civ Eng
no DOI — not checkedATC (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City
no DOI — not checkedATC (2005) FEMA 440: Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City
no DOI — not checkedATC (2009) FEMA P695: quantification of building seismic performance factors. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City
no DOI — not checkedATC (2012) FEMA P-58: seismic performance assessment of buildings. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City
no DOI — not checkedBuilding Seismic Safety Council (2003) FEMA 450: NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. National Institute of Builiding Sciences, Washington
no DOI — not checkedCarrillo J (2004) Modelación del comportamiento inelástico de pórticos de concreto con mampostería no reforzada. Universidad de los Andes
no DOI — not checkedCSI Computer & Structures Inc (2004) SAP2000 - linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures
no DOI — not checkedCSI Computer & Structures Inc (2016) PERFORM 3D - performed-based design of 3D structures
no DOI — not checkedCSI Computer & Structures Inc (2020) ETABS - building analysis and design
no DOI — not checkedDigicon Engineering Consult, The World Bank (2016) Structural integrity and damage assessment (SIDA) for educational Infrastructures in Nepal
no DOI — not checkedDolšek M, Fajfar P (2004) IN2 - a simple alternative for IDA. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. p 15
no DOI — not checkedEERI (2019) Concrete buildings damaged in earthquakes. Oakland, CA
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Committee for Standarization (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. CEN, EN 1998-1, Brussels
no DOI — not checkedFaella C, Lima C, Martinelli E (2008) Non-linear Static methods for seismic fragility analysis and reliability evaluation of existing structures. In: 14th World Conf Earthq Eng
no DOI — not checkedFernández RI, Rincón R, Yamin LE (2019) Incertidumbre en el Beneficio Obtenido para Opciones de Reforzamiento Sísmico. In: IX Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Sísmica. Cali, Colombia
no DOI — not checkedFernández R, Yamin L, Reyes JC, et al (2021) Mitigación del riesgo sísmico de la infraestructura escolar. In: Investigaciones en Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres para Colombia: Avances, Perspectivas y Casos de Estudio. Bogotá, pp 36–69
no DOI — not checkedGEER (2016) GEER-ATC earthquake reconnaissance April 16th 2016, muisne, ecuador. Geotech extrem events reconnaiss assoc Rep GEER-049 604
no DOI — not checkedIADB (2014) Learning in twenty-first century schools
no DOI — not checkedLi Q, Ellingwood BR (2005) Structural response and damage assessment by enhanced uncoupled modal response history analysis. J Earthq Eng 9:719–737
no DOI — not checkedNassirpour A, Galasso C, D’Ayala D (2018) Increasing seismic resilience of Philippines’ School. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering. pp 1–12
no DOI — not checkedPEER (2020a) Strong ground motion databases. https://peer.berkeley.edu/peer-strong-ground-motion-databases
no DOI — not checkedPEER (2020b) OpenSees - the open system for earthquake engineering simulation
no DOI — not checkedRincon R, Yamin L, Becerra A (2017) Seismic risk assessment of public schools and prioritization strategy for risk mitigation. In: 16th World:12
no DOI — not checkedSilva V, Akkar S, Baker J et al (2018) Current challenges and future trens in analytical fragility and vulnerability modellin. Earthq Spectra 173:669–680
no DOI — not checkedThe World Bank (2018) Información Técnica para el Plan de Mitigación del Riesgo Sísmico de las Edificaciones Escolares en El Salvador
no DOI — not checkedThe World Bank (2019) Global library for school infrastructure (GLOSI) - global program for safer schools. https://gpss.worldbank.org/en/GLOSI. Accessed 10 Oct 2021
no DOI — not checkedThe World Bank (2020) Evaluación del riesgo por sismo y viento huracanado y planes de reducción del riesgo para la infraestructura educativa pública de República Dominicana
no DOI — not checkedUNDRR (2017) Comprehensive school safety, a global framework in support of the global alliance for disaster risk reduction and resilience in the education sector and the worldwide initiative for safe schools. Geneva, Switzerland
no DOI — not checkedUNESCO (2019) Guidelines for assessing learning facilities in the context of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. In: Introduction to learning facilities assessment and to the VISUS methodology, vol 1. Paris, France
no DOI — not checkedUnited Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org
no DOI — not checkedWen YK, Ellingwood BR, Veneziano D, Bracci J (2003) Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering. MAE Cent Proj 1–113
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-10 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-022-01445-5"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-022-01445-5/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-022-01445-5/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10518-022-01445-5)