At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in
Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the
registry record that put it there.
The 85 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/194008291600900216Impacts of Small-Scale Gold Mining on Birds and Anurans Near the Tambopata Natural Reserve, Peru, Assessed Using Passive Acoustic Monitoring
resolves10.1007/s10336-020-01812-6The optimal listening period for an effective assessment of bird richness and composition: a case study of Neotropical forest
resolves10.1007/s10531-017-1307-yAmphibian decline, pond loss and reduced population connectivity under agricultural intensification over a 38 year period
resolves10.1111/btp.12168Habitat Loss Reduces the Diversity of Frog Reproductive Modes in an Atlantic Forest Fragmented Landscape
resolves10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2016-0197Amphibians of Vassununga State Park, one of the last remnants of semideciduous Atlantic Forest and Cerrado in northeastern São Paulo state, Brazil
resolves10.1163/156853802760061804Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boracéia, Southeastern Brazil
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.xAcoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus
resolves10.1002/wsb.619A comparison of acoustic monitoring methods for common anurans of the northeastern United States
resolves10.1590/S1676-06032013000100014Composição e riqueza de espécies de anfíbios anuros em três diferentes habitat em um agrossistema no Cerrado do Brasil central
resolves10.1111/jbi.13944Towards an extended framework for the general dynamic theory of biogeography
resolves10.1890/13-0133.1Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies
resolves10.1111/1365-2664.13229Comparing the sampling performance of sound recorders versus point counts in bird surveys: A meta‐analysis
resolves10.1155/2013/183726Forest Fragments Surrounded by Sugar Cane Are More Inhospitable to Terrestrial Amphibian Abundance Than Fragments Surrounded by Pasture
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0156781Breeding Guild Determines Frog Distributions in Response to Edge Effects and Habitat Conversion in the Brazil’s Atlantic Forest
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.017Paradox, presumption and pitfalls in conservation biology: The importance of habitat change for amphibians and reptiles
resolves10.1111/2041-210X.13101Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring
resolves10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00557.xAmphibian Distributions in a Landscape of Forests and Agriculture: an Examination of Landscape Composition and Conf iguration
resolves10.1139/f03-095The effects of adjacent land use on wetland amphibian species richness and community composition
resolves10.1016/j.foreco.2008.04.043Amphibian distributions in riparian and upslope areas and their habitat associations on managed forest landscapes in the Oregon Coast Range
resolves10.1111/aec.12490Effect of species‐counting protocols and the spatial distribution of effort on rarefaction curves in relation to decision making in environmental‐impact assessments
resolves10.11646/zootaxa.4251.1.1The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods and recommendations for best practice
resolves10.1071/WR16086Biodiversity assessment: selecting sampling techniques to access anuran diversity in grassland ecosystems
resolves10.15560/11.3.1645Anurans of the Agudos and Jaú municipalities, state of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil
resolves10.1038/s41598-018-20823-1Homogenization and impoverishment of taxonomic and functional diversity of ants in Eucalyptus plantations
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108305Active or passive acoustic monitoring? Assessing methods to track anuran communities in tropical savanna wetlands
resolves10.1670/91-04AAuditory Sampling of Frogs: Detection Efficiency in Relation to Survey Duration
resolves10.1177/194008291500800117Determining Temporal Sampling Schemes for Passive Acoustic Studies in Different Tropical Ecosystems
resolves10.1007/s10980-021-01236-4Multiple environmental filters and competition affect the spatial co-occurrence of pond-breeding anurans at both local and landscape scales in the Brazilian Cerrado
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation
resolves10.1007/s10531-017-1390-0Passive acoustic monitoring as a complementary strategy to assess biodiversity in the Brazilian Amazonia
resolves10.1590/1519-6984.19412Differential success in sampling of Atlantic Forest amphibians among different periods of the day
resolves10.1111/ecog.02097The matrix matters, but how should we manage it? Estimating the amount of high‐quality matrix required to maintain biodiversity in fragmented landscapes
resolves10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105937Sampling effort and information quality provided by rare and common species in estimating assemblage structure
resolves10.1002/rse2.131A roadmap for survey designs in terrestrial acoustic monitoring
resolves10.1111/1365-2656.13399Drivers of assemblage‐wide calling activity in tropical anurans and the role of temporal resolution
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.005Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: Lessons from aging human-modified landscapes
resolves10.1121/1.4922703Effects of subsampling of passive acoustic recordings on acoustic metrics
resolves10.1186/s12898-019-0243-yExplosive breeding in tropical anurans: environmental triggers, community composition and acoustic structure
resolves10.1590/S1676-06032005000300010Diversidade, distribuição espacial e temporal de anfíbios anuros (Amphibia, Anura) na região noroeste do estado de São Paulo, Brasil
resolves10.1002/ece3.424Permeability of the landscape matrix between amphibian breeding sites
resolves10.1016/j.biocon.2014.05.014Evaluating the risk of pesticide exposure for amphibian species listed in Annex II of the European Union Habitats Directive
resolves10.1017/S0266467404002068Seasonal abundance in the floor-dwelling frog fauna on Iriomote Island of the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan
resolves10.1111/aec.12228If a frog calls in the forest: Bioacoustic monitoring reveals the breeding phenology of the endangered <scp>R</scp>ichmond <scp>R</scp>ange mountain frog (<scp><i>P</i></scp><i>hiloria richmondensis</i>)
resolves10.1890/12-2088.1Sampling environmental acoustic recordings to determine bird species richness
resolves10.1111/2041-210X.12730Acoustic monitoring for conservation in tropical forests: examples from forest elephants
resolves10.1590/S1676-06032007000200005Taxocenose de anuros de uma mata semidecídua do interior do Estado de São Paulo e comparações com outras taxocenoses do estado, sudeste do Brasil
The 14 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBioacoustics Research Program (2014) Raven Pro: Interactive Sound Analysis Software (Version 1.5) [Computer software]. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca http://www.birds.cornell.edu/raven.
no DOI — not checkedBrowning E, Gibb R, Glover-Kapfer P, Jones KE (2017) Passive acoustic monitoring in ecology and conservation. Woking, UK
no DOI — not checkedHilton-Taylor C, Pollock CM, Chanson JS, Butchart SHM, Oldfield TEE, Katariya V (2009) State of the world’s species. Pages 15–41 in world - an analysis of the 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland
no DOI — not checkedHsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A (2016) iNEXT: iNterpolation and EXTrapolation for species diversity. R package version 2.0.12 URL: http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download/.
no DOI — not checkedIBGE (2010) Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo Demográfico. Available online at. https://www.ibge.gov.br/. Accessed 13 October 2020
no DOI — not checkedMacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
no DOI — not checkedMack AL, Alonso LE (2000) A biological assessment of the Wapoga River area of Northwestern Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Rapid Assessment Program Bulletin of Biological Assessment 14, Conservation International, Washington
no DOI — not checkedMagurran AE (2003) Measuring biological diversity. Wiley, Oxford
no DOI — not checkedMontambault JR, Missa O (2002) A biodiversity assessment of the Eastern Kanuku Mountains, Lower Kwitaro River, Guyana. Rapid Assessment Program Bulletin of Biological Assessment 26. Conservation International, Washington
no DOI — not checkedObrist MK, Pavan G, Sueur J, Riede K, Llusia D, Marquez R (2010) Bioacoustics approaches in biodiversity inventories. Abc Taxa 8:68
no DOI — not checkedParris KM, Norton WT, Cunningham BR (1999) A comparison of techniques for sampling amphibians in the forests of south-east Queensland, Australia. Herpetologica 55:271–283
no DOI — not checkedPrado GM, Pombal JP Jr (2005) Distribuição espacial e temporal dos anuros em um brejo na Reserva Biológica de Duas Bocas, sudeste do Brasil. Arq Do Mus Nac 63:685–705
no DOI — not checkedR Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
no DOI — not checkedRödel MO, Ernst R (2004) Measuring and monitoring amphibian diversity in tropical forests I: an evaluation of methods with recommendations for standardization. Ecotropica 101:24
checked 2026-08-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited;
titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The
badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.