Reference health
A framework for implementing socially just climate adaptation
43/43 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
20 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 43 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.009
Place, well-being, and fairness shape priorities for adaptation to climate change
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.010
Climate justice and global cities: Mapping the emerging discourses
resolves10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
Resilience: A Bridging Concept or a Dead End?“Reframing” Resilience: Challenges for Planning Theory and PracticeInteracting Traps: Resilience Assessment of a Pasture Management System in Northern AfghanistanUrban Resilience: What Does it Mean in Planning Practice?Resilience as a Useful Concept for Climate Change Adaptation?The Politics of Resilience for Planning: A Cautionary Note
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation
resolves10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637
Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses
resolves10.1080/09644016.2017.1287625
Procedural justice in local climate adaptation: political capabilities and transformational change
resolves10.5751/ES-05929-180448
Justice in Urban Climate Change Adaptation: Criteria and Application to Delhi
resolves10.1023/A:1005627828199
Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change andFacilitating Adaptation
resolves10.1080/00343404.2016.1200719
The ‘resilience trap’: exploring the practical utility of resilience for climate change adaptation in UK city-regions
resolves10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101934
The black box of power in polycentric environmental governance
resolves10.1080/09644010802193609
Science and social justice in the governance of adaptation to climate change
resolves10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.002
Political feasibility of 1.5°C societal transformations: the role of social justice
resolves10.1089/env.2009.0029
The International Dimension of Climate Justice and the Need for International Adaptation Funding
resolves10.1017/S0143814X00003846
Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis
resolves10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC POLICY: A FRAMEWORK OF ANALYSIS*
resolves10.1017/S0892679412000615
Climate Justice and Capabilities: A Framework for Adaptation Policy
resolves10.1080/09644016.2017.1287628
Adaptation policy and community discourse: risk, vulnerability, and just transformation
resolves10.1080/17565529.2013.828583
Inequality and transformation analyses: a complementary lens for addressing vulnerability to climate change
The 20 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAgyeman J (2013) Introducing just sustainabilities: policy, planning, and practice. Zed Books Ltd
no DOI — not checkedBarkan J, Pulido L (2017) Justice: an epistolary essay. Ann Am Assoc Geograph 107(1):33–40
no DOI — not checkedChu E (2017) Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state-society relations: the politics of community knowledge and mobilization in Indore, India. Urban Stud:1–17
no DOI — not checkedFraser N (2014) Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge
no DOI — not checkedGray B (2003) Framing environmental disputes. In: Gray B Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: frames and cases. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 11–34
no DOI — not checkedHarris LM, Chu EK, Ziervogel G (2018) Negotiated resilience. Resilience 6(3):96–214
no DOI — not checkedHoffman AJ (2015) How culture shapes the climate change debate. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto
no DOI — not checkedHupe P (2014) What happens on the ground: persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy Admin 29(2):164–182
no DOI — not checkedIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group II (2014) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. IPCC Working Group II
no DOI — not checkedJenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Ingold K (2017) The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research program. In: Weible CM, Sabatier PA (eds) Theories of the policy process, 4th edn. Westview press, pp 135–171
no DOI — not checkedLewicki RJ, Saunders DM, Barry B (2015) Negotiation, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New York
no DOI — not checkedLindblom CL (1968) The policy-making process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
no DOI — not checkedLipskey M (1980) Street level bureaucracy. The dilemmas of individuals in the public service. Russel Sage Foundation, New York
no DOI — not checkedMnookin RH, Peppet SR, Tulumello AS (2001) Beyond winning: negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
no DOI — not checkedPressman J, Wildavsky A (1979) Implementation: how great expectations are dashed. University of California Press, Berkeley
no DOI — not checkedPutnam LL, Wondollek JM (2003) Intractability: definitions, dimensions, and distinctions. In: Lewicki R (ed) Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: concepts and cases, pp 35–62
no DOI — not checkedSabatier P, Jenkins-Smith (2011) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. San Francisco and Oxford. Westview Press, Boulder
no DOI — not checkedSchlosberg D (2009) Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press
no DOI — not checkedSewell GC (2005) Actors, coalitions and the framework convention on climate change. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
no DOI — not checkedYoung IM (2011) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6)