Reference health

The geo-graph in practice: creating United States Congressional Districts from census blocks

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-017-9936-3
CiteStamped reference-health badge
17/17 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-25

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

12 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 17 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00380-0
A tabu search heuristic and adaptive memory procedure for political districting
resolves10.1016/S0305-0548(01)00056-9
A simulated annealing approach to police district design
resolves10.1137/1.9780898719819
Evaluation and Optimization of Electoral Systems
resolves10.1287/mnsc.45.10.1307
Fast Approximation Methods for Sales Force Deployment
resolves10.1007/BF02578982
Towards a unified territorial design approach — Applications, algorithms and GIS integration
resolves10.1002/j.1538-7305.1970.tb01770.x
An Efficient Heuristic Procedure for Partitioning Graphs
resolves10.1007/s10107-014-0762-4
Efficient geo-graph contiguity and hole algorithms for geographic zoning and dynamic plane graph partitioning
resolves10.1287/opre.1120.1083
Geo-Graphs: An Efficient Model for Enforcing Contiguity and Hole Constraints in Planar Graph Partitioning
resolves10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1100
An Optimization Based Heuristic for Political Districting
resolves10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.041
Weighted Voronoi region algorithms for political districting
resolves10.1007/s10288-011-0177-5
Political districting: from classical models to recent approaches
resolves10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.065
Local search algorithms for political districting
resolves10.1111/j.1538-4632.2005.00605.x
A Model of Contiguity for Spatial Unit Allocation
resolves10.1068/b34104
Districting Modeling with Exact Contiguity Constraints
resolves10.1137/0201010
Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms
resolves10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.10.004
Reflections on current criteria to evaluate redistricting plans
resolves10.1080/00207720802645246
A mini–max spanning forest approach to the political districting problem
The 12 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAltman, M.: Is automation the answer? The computational complexity of automated redistricting. Rutgers Comput. Technol. Law J. 23(1), 81–142 (1997)
no DOI — not checkedBurnett, K.D.: Congressional apportionment. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-08.pdf (2011). Accessed 29 Dec 2011
no DOI — not checkedButler, D., Cain, B.E.: Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. MacMillan Publishing Company, New York (1992)
no DOI — not checkedHorowitz, E., Sahni, S.: Fundamentals of Computer Algorithms. Computer Science Press, Rockville (1978)
no DOI — not checkedKing, D.M.: Graph theory models and algorithms for political districting: an approach to inform public policy. Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2012)
no DOI — not checkedMissouri Census Data Center: MABLE/Geocorr2010: Geographic correspondence engine with census 2010 geography. http://mcdc1.missouri.edu/MableGeocorr/geocorr2010.html (2011). Accessed 29 Dec 2011
no DOI — not checkedPublic Mapping Project: About the data. http://www.publicmapping.org/resources/data (2011). Accessed 29 Dec 2011
no DOI — not checkedRicca, F.: A multicriteria districting heuristic for the aggregation of zones and its use in computing origin-destination matrices. INFOR 42(1), 61–77 (2004)
no DOI — not checkedSchwartzberg, J.E.: Reapportionment, gerrymanders, and the notion of compactness. Minn. Law Rev. 50, 443–452 (1965)
no DOI — not checkedTheobald, D.M.: Understanding topology and shapefiles. ArcUser. http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/0401/topo.html (2001). Accessed 12 May 2011, April–June
no DOI — not checkedUnited States Census Bureau: 2010 Census TIGER/Line Shapefiles. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2010/tgrshp2010.html (2011). Accessed 29 Dec 2011
no DOI — not checkedUnited States Census Bureau: Tallies of census blocks by state or state equivalent. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/2010census/census_block_tally.html (2011). Accessed 27 May 2011
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-25 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10589-017-9936-3"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10589-017-9936-3/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10589-017-9936-3/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10589-017-9936-3)