Reference health
Innocence Commissions: Due Process Remedies and Protection for the Innocent
4/4 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
29 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 4 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1016/0047-2352(95)00051-8
Race, drug, and criminal sentencing: Hidden effects of the criminal law
resolves10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.153
Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed in the cross-race situation?
resolves10.1111/j.1745-9125.1987.tb00794.x
THE IMPACT OF THE ETHNICITY AND GENDER OF DEFENDANTS ON THE DECISION TO REJECT OR DISMISS FELONY CHARGES*
The 29 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedArmstrong, Ken and Steve Mills (1999). Inept defense clouds verdict. Chicago Tribune. 15 November.
no DOI — not checkedAssociated Press (2000). Illinois puts executions on hold. 31 January.
no DOI — not checkedBarrett E. (1997). False confessions and fundamental fairness: The need for electronic recordingof custodial interrogations Boston Public Interest Law Journal.
no DOI — not checkedWrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice
no DOI — not checkedLegal homicide: death as punishment in America 1964–1982
no DOI — not checkedWrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice
no DOI — not checkedExonerees
no DOI — not checkedConvicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science: Case Studies in the Use of DNA Evidence to Establish Innocence After Trial
no DOI — not checkedFindley and Keith (2002). Learning from our mistakes: A criminal justice commission to study wrongful convictions. California Western Law Review.
no DOI — not checkedHammond and Larry (2003). Personal communication.
no DOI — not checkedHumphrey, John and Susan Westervelt (2002). Introduction to Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice, Susan D. Westerveltand and John A. Humphrey (eds.). New Brunswick: Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedCriminal Interrogation and Confessions
no DOI — not checkedJohnson and Sheri (1984). Cross-racial identification errors in criminal cases. Cornell Law Review.
no DOI — not checkedNAACP Legal Defense Fund (2000). Death row USA. New York: NAACP Legal Defense Fund, 1 April.
no DOI — not checkedWrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice
no DOI — not checkedIn Spite of Innocence: The Ordeal of 400 Americans Wrongly Convicted of Crimes Punishable by Death
no DOI — not checkedSaks and Michael (1998). Merlin and Solomon: Lessons from the law’s formative encounters with forensic identification science. Hastings Law Journal.
no DOI — not checkedActual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and how to Make it Right
no DOI — not checked4798_CR21
no DOI — not checkedSchehr, Robert Carl and Lynne Weathered (2004). Should the United States establish a criminal cases review commission? Judicature, 88(3): 122(5).
no DOI — not checkedCriminal Violence, Criminal Justice
no DOI — not checkedSlobogin and Christopher (1996). Reform: The police: testilying: police perjury and what to do about it. Colorado Law Review.
no DOI — not checkedMalign Neglect
no DOI — not checkedStatistical Abstract of the United States
no DOI — not checkedPrisoners in 1998
no DOI — not checkedThe Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity and Crime in America
no DOI — not checkedWhite Welsh (1997). False confessions and the constitution: Safeguards against untrustworthy confessions Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review.
no DOI — not checkedWilliams Linda (2001). Case study on state and county cots associated with capital adjudication in Arizona: Data set III. Research report to Arizona capital case commission Arizona Capital Case Commission Final Report.
no DOI — not checkedFrom the jailhouse to the courthouse: The role of informants in wrongful convictions
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10612-005-4798-x"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10612-005-4798-x/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10612-005-4798-x)