Reference health
Municipal Waste Kuznets Curves: Evidence on Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness from the EU
1 of 53 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-07-26
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
22 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.1787/9789264106192-10-en
The 52 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2297968
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations
resolves10.1023/B:EARE.0000003595.60196.a9
An Econometric Analysis of Global Waste Paper Recovery and Utilization
resolves10.1017/S1355770X0300342
Upgrading municipal environmental services to European Union levels: a case study of household willingness to pay in Lithuania
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.005
Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models
resolves10.1142/S1464333203001309
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION, ENVIRONMENTAL SUFFERING AND POLICY MEASURES: AN INDEX OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY PERFORMANCE (IESP)
resolves10.1108/01443580610639884
Degree of environmental stringency and the impact on trade patterns
resolves10.1023/A:1008315305404
Adopting a Unit Pricing System for Municipal Solid Waste: Policy and Socio-Economic Determinants
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.015
Using choice question formats to determine compensable values: The case of a landfill-siting process
resolves10.1023/B:EARE.0000029913.49860.e3
On Impatience, Economic Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Dynamic Analysis of Resource Management
resolves10.1016/j.jeem.2004.08.001
Industrial characteristics, environmental regulations and air pollution: an analysis of the UK manufacturing sector
resolves10.1111/j.1467-9442.2006.00439.x
Endogenous Pollution Havens: Does FDI Influence Environmental Regulations?*
resolves10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.029
Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods
resolves10.1023/A:1017560208742
Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a Vital Factor in Analysing the Environmental Impact of Socio-Economic Metabolism
resolves10.1023/A:1008313612369
The Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities in Federal Systems: The Political Economy of NIMBY
resolves10.1080/09640560701864878
Host community attitudes towards solid waste landfill infrastructure: comprehension before compensation
resolves10.1023/A:1026475208718
A Post-Consumer Waste Management Model for Determining Optimal Levels of Recycling and Landfilling
resolves10.2307/3655808
Generation of Household Solid Waste in OECD Countries: An Empirical Analysis Using Macroeconomic Data
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E
On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models
resolves10.1007/s10640-004-1046-x
The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Flow versus Stock Pollution: The Neglect of Future Damages
resolves10.1080/13504850500407640
Is waste generation de-linking from economic growth? Empirical evidence for Europe
resolves10.1080/15693430500364707
Delinking and environmental Kuznets curves for waste indicators in Europe
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1<3::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-1
Talking trash about landfills: Using quantitative scoring schemes in landfill siting processes
resolves10.1017/S0143814X04000145
Economic Growth as Environmental Policy? Reconsidering the Environmental Kuznets Curve
resolves10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00179-1
Environmental Kuznets curves—real progress or passing the buck?
resolves10.1023/A:1012831804794
The EKC Hypothesis Does Not Hold for Direct Material Flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis Tests for Direct Material Flows in Five Industrial Countries
resolves10.1023/A:1008214417099
Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting
resolves10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.03.003
The impact of the European Landfill Directive on waste management strategy and current legislation in Turkey's Specially Protected Areas
resolves10.1080/135048598353970
A risk-based environmental Kuznets curve for US hazardous waste sites
resolves10.1007/s10640-006-9040-0
Economic Incentives and Residential Waste Management in Taiwan: An Empirical Investigation
The 22 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAlpay S, Caliskan A, Mahmud S (2006) Environmental policy performance, economic growth and trade liberalization: a cross country empirical analysis. Department of Economics, Bilkent University, mimeo
no DOI — not checkedBrisson I, Pearce D (1995) Benefit transfer for disamenity from waste disposal. CSERGE working paper No 6, UCL, London
no DOI — not checkedCallan S, Thomas J (2006) Analyzing demand for disposal and recycling services: a systems approach. East Econ J 32(2): 221–240
no DOI — not checkedCole M (2005) Re-examining the pollution-income relationship: a random coefficients approach. Econ Bull 14: 1–7
no DOI — not checkedDEFRA (2005) A study to estimate the disamenity costs of landfill in Great Britain. DEFRA, London
no DOI — not checkedDEFRA/DTI (2003) Sustainable consumption and production indicators. DEFRA, London
no DOI — not checkedEC (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. European Commission, Bruxelles
no DOI — not checkedEEA (2006) Market-based instruments for environmental policy in Europe (technical report No 8/2005). European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
no DOI — not checkedEEA (2007) The road from landfilling to recycling: common destination different routes. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
no DOI — not checkedEliste P, Fredrikkson PG (1998) Does open trade result in a race to the bottom? Cross country evidence. The World Bank, mimeo
no DOI — not checkedEshet T, Ayalon O, Shechter M (2004) A meta analysis of waste management externalities: a comparative study of economic and non economic valuation methods. University of Haifa, Israel, mimeo
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (EC) (2003a) Towards a thematic strategy for waste prevention and recycling, COM (2003) 301. European Commission, Brussels
no DOI — not checkedEuropean Commission (EC) (2003b) Towards a thematic strategy on sustainable use of natural resources COM (2003) 572. European Commission, Brussels
no DOI — not checkedGrossman GM, Krueger AB (1994) Economic growth and the environment. NBER Working papers 4634. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
no DOI — not checkedHoltz-Eakin D, Selden TM (1992) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. NBER working papers 4248. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
no DOI — not checkedJacobsen H, Mazzanti M, Moll S, Simeone MG, Pontoglio S, Zoboli R (2004) Methodology and indicators to measure decoupling, resource efficiency, and waste prevention. ETC/WMF, European topic centre on waste and material flows. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
no DOI — not checkedKarousakis K (2009) MSW generation disposal and recycling: empirical evidence from OECD countries. In: Mazzanti M, Montini A (eds) Waste & environmental policy. Routledge, London
no DOI — not checkedMazzanti M, Montini A (eds) (2009) Waste & environmental policy. Routledge, London
no DOI — not checkedPearce DW (2004) Does European Union waste policy pass a cost benefit test?. World Econ 5(3): 115–137
no DOI — not checkedPowell J, Brisson I (1995) Benefit transfer for disamenity from waste disposal. CSERGE working paper. UCL, London
no DOI — not checkedWooldridge J (2003) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. The MIT press, Cambridge Mass
no DOI — not checkedWorld Bank (1992) Development and the environment, World bank Report. Oxford University Press, Washington, DC
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10640-009-9280-x"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10640-009-9280-x/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10640-009-9280-x)