Reference health

Towards defect monitoring for metallic additive manufacturing components using phased array ultrasonic testing

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01505-9
CiteStamped reference-health badge
16/16 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-23

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

11 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 16 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1063/1.4914607
Monitoring system for the quality assessment in additive manufacturing
resolves10.1007/s40194-019-00705-4
Towards a multi-sensor monitoring methodology for AM metallic processes
resolves10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.003
Sizing of flaws using ultrasonic bulk wave testing: A review
resolves10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002
Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation
resolves10.14743/apem2018.2.281
In-process non-destructive ultrasonic testing application during wire plus arc additive manufacturing
resolves10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8
Ultrasonic Testing of Materials
resolves10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.020
Non-destructive testing application of radiography and ultrasound for wire and arc additive manufacturing
resolves10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1067
Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography
resolves10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.020
Modeling and control of a direct laser powder deposition process for Functionally Graded Materials (FGM) parts manufacturing
resolves10.3390/ma12050808
Analytical Modeling of In-Process Temperature in Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing Considering Laser Power Absorption, Latent Heat, Scanning Strategy, and Powder Packing
resolves10.1007/s40194-018-0556-z
Numerical simulation of WAAM process by a GMAW weld pool model
resolves10.1007/s10845-016-1282-2
Evaluation of genetic programming-based models for simulating bead dimensions in wire and arc additive manufacturing
resolves10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.1327
Online Prediction of Machining Distortion of Aeronautical Parts Caused by Re-Equilibration of Residual Stresses
resolves10.1007/s00339-017-1194-9
Thermal behavior in single track during selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg powder
resolves10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073
Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing
resolves10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.01.005
Porosity evolution and its thermodynamic mechanism of randomly packed powder-bed during selective laser melting of Inconel 718 alloy
The 11 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedGu, J., Cong, B., Ding, J., Williams, S. W., & Zhai, Y. (2014). Wire + arc additive manufacturing of aluminium. In Solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, Texas (pp. 451–458).
no DOI — not checkedHascoët, J.-Y., Muller, P., & Mognol, P. (2011). Manufacturing of complex parts with continuous functionally graded materials (FGM). In Solid freefrom fabrication symposium (pp. 557–569).
no DOI — not checkedJavadi, Y., Macleod, C. N., Pierce, S. G., Gachagan, A., Kerr, W., Ding, J., et al. (2019). Ultrasonic phased array inspection of wire + arc additive manufacture samples using conventional and total focusing method imaging approaches. Insight,61, 298–306.
no DOI — not checkedKerninon, J., Mognol, P., Hascoet, J.-Y., & Legonidec, C. (2008). Effect of path strategies on metallic parts manufactured by additive process. In Solid freeform fabrication symposium (pp. 352–361).
no DOI — not checkedKwon, O., Kim, H. G., Ham, M. J., Kim, W., Kim, G. H., Cho, J. H., Kim, N. I., & Kim, K. (2018). A deep neural network for classification of melt-pool images in metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–12.
no DOI — not checkedLe Jeune, L., Robert, S., Membre, A., & Prada, C. (2015). Adaptative ultrasonic imaging with the total focusing method for inspection of complex components immersed in water. In 41st annual review of progress in quantitative non-destructive evaluation, Boise, Idaho (Vol. 34, pp. 1037–1046).
no DOI — not checkedLopez, A., Bacelar, I., Pires, I., Santos, T., & Quintino, L. (2017). Mapping of non-destructive techniques for inspection of wire + arc additive manufacturing. In Proceedings of 7th international conference on mechanics and materials in designing, Portugal (pp. 1829–1844).
no DOI — not checkedObaton, A.-F., Butsch, B., McDonough, S., Carcreff, E., Laroche, N., Gaillard, Y., Tarr, J. B., Bouvet, P., Cruz, R., & Donmez, A. (2018). Evaluation of non-destructive volumetric testing methods for additively manufactured parts. In ASTM symposium on structural integrity of additive manufactured parts, Washington, DC.
no DOI — not checkedRasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedRieder, H., Dillhofer, A., & Spies, M. (2015). Ultrasonic online monitoring of additive manufacturing processes based on selective laser melting. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive and Evaluation,1650(1), 84–191.
no DOI — not checkedXu, N., Shi, Y. W., He, F. C., & Yang, P. H. (2017). Ultrasonic array inspection for additive manufacturing components using full matrix capture. In 15th Asia Pacific conference for non-destructive testing, Singapore.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-23 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10845-019-01505-9"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10845-019-01505-9/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10845-019-01505-9/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s10845-019-01505-9)