Reference health
Lay beliefs about competition: Scale development and gender differences
92/92 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 92 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1037/h0078076
Sex Differences in Cooperative and Competitive Attitudes From the 2nd Through the 12th Grades.
resolves10.1162/REST_a_00312
Gender, Competitiveness, and Socialization at a Young Age: Evidence From a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society
resolves10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
Reducing the Effects of Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping Theories of Intelligence
resolves10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00143.x
META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FIVE‐FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND HOLLAND'S OCCUPATIONAL TYPES
resolves10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention
resolves10.1007/s11187-012-9459-3
Gender gap in latent and nascent entrepreneurship: driven by competitiveness
resolves10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.020
Buffering against weight gain following dieting setbacks: An implicit theory intervention
resolves10.1037/a0029531
Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation.
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2015.2321
The Impact of Losing in a Competition on the Willingness to Seek Further Challenges
resolves10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space
resolves10.1037/h0046016
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
resolves10.1037/apl0000014
Understanding organizational commitment: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of the five-factor model of personality and culture.
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.408
The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles.
resolves10.1080/10413209108406432
Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the eccles' expectancy-value model
resolves10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2
Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change11We are grateful to Lotte Bailyn and our colleagues affiliated with the Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons Graduate School of Management – Gill Coleman, Joyce Fletcher, Deborah Kolb, Deborah Merrill-Sands, Rhona Rapoport, and Bridgette Sheridan – for their contributions to these ideas and for their foundational research, on which this paper builds. We also appreciate the feedback we received on an earlier draft from members of the FSC Research Group, Elaine Backman, Herminia Ibarra, Maureen Scully, and Kathleen Valley. We thank Joanne Martin and Barbara Reskin for their comments, which helped in our conceptual framing of the paper. Finally, we thank Bob Sutton and Barry Staw for their helpful suggestions. This research was funded in part by the Ford Foundation.
resolves10.1037/h0035872
Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria.
resolves10.1177/0013164409344492
Development of the Competitive Work Environment Scale: A Multidimensional Climate Construct
resolves10.1093/restud/rdu030
Do Competitive Workplaces Deter Female Workers? A Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment on Job Entry Decisions
resolves10.3982/ECTA6690
Gender Differences in Competition: Evidence\\ From a Matrilineal and a Patriarchal Society
resolves10.1111/spc3.12267
Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.128
Experimental Research on Just-World Theory: Problems, Developments, and Future Challenges.
resolves10.1080/10705519909540118
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
resolves10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness
resolves10.1080/00224545.1979.9924201
A Measure of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Attitudes
resolves10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00056.x
Shared Reality, System Justification, and the Relational Basis of Ideological Beliefs
resolves10.1177/1368430219827361
Examining the role of perceived prestige in the link between students’ subjective socioeconomic status and sense of belonging
resolves10.1037/a0015997
Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be.
resolves10.1016/j.joep.2009.03.006
Do gender differences in preferences for competition matter for occupational expectations?
resolves10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.009
Back to the roots: The 2 × 2 standpoints and standards achievement goal model
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.49
Implicit negotiation beliefs and performance: Experimental and longitudinal evidence.
resolves10.1037/pspi0000051
Gender differences in response to competition with same-gender coworkers: A relational perspective.
resolves10.1037/a0037699
Changing theories of change: Strategic shifting in implicit theory endorsement.
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories.
resolves10.1207/S15327957PSPR0502_4
Elements of a Lay Theory of Groups: Types of Groups, Relational Styles, and the Perception of Group Entitativity
resolves10.1080/00224545.1993.9712175
Sex Differences in Competitiveness and the Valuation of Money in Twenty Countries
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.192
Finding "Meaning" in Psychology: A Lay Theories Approach to Self-Regulation, Social Perception, and Social Development.
resolves10.1086/678519
Do Men and Women Respond Differently to Competition? Evidence from a Major Education Reform
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.949
Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events.
resolves10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.019
Why women don’t run: Experimental evidence on gender differences in political competition aversion
resolves10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98
A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys.
resolves10.1207/s15327752jpa6602_15
Construction of a Personal Development Competitive Attitude Scale
resolves10.1353/mpq.2005.0013
Cultural and Gender Differences in the Implications of Competition for Early Adolescent Friendship
resolves10.1177/0013164492052002016
The Nature of Competitiveness: The Development and Validation of the Competitiveness Index
resolves10.1287/mnsc.2014.1981
Gender Differences in the Willingness to Compete Emerge Early in Life and Persist
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.731
Implicit theories of emotion: Affective and social outcomes across a major life transition.
resolves10.1123/jsp.3.4.345
The Effect of Preexisting and Manipulated Self-efficacy on a Competitive Muscular Endurance Task
resolves10.1016/0273-2297(86)90015-8
Female behavior in mixed-sex competition: A review of the literature
resolves10.1037/a0020600
Predicting adult occupational environments from gender and childhood personality traits.
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedArbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago: IBM SPSS.
no DOI — not checkedBays, J., Goland, T., & Newsum, J. (2009, July). Using prizes to spur innovation. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved January 29, 2018, from
http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/using-prizes-to-spur-innovation
.
no DOI — not checkedBosquet, C., Combes, P.-P., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2017). Gender and promotions: Evidence from academic economists in France. Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper, No 1511.
no DOI — not checkedCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
no DOI — not checkedDweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
no DOI — not checkedElliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. Deci & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination theory (pp. 361–387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
no DOI — not checkedFischer, K. W., Knight, C. C., & Van Parys, M. (1993). Analyzing diversity in developmental pathways: Methods and concepts. In R. Case & W. Edelstein (Eds.), The new structuralism in cognitive development: Theory and research on individual pathways (pp. 33–56). Basel: S. Karger.
no DOI — not checkedHayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
no DOI — not checkedHelmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,
8(2), 35 (MS #1677).
no DOI — not checkedHorney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.
no DOI — not checkedKirsch, I. (Ed.). (1999). How expectancies shape experience. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
no DOI — not checkedKohn, A. (1992). No contest: The case against competition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
no DOI — not checkedNicholson, N. (2000). Managing the human animal. London: Texere Publishing.
no DOI — not checkedOlson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211–238). New York: Guilford Press.
no DOI — not checkedSpence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 10–74). San Francisco: Freeman.
no DOI — not checkedStevenson, A., & White, M. (2011). Concise Oxford English dictionary (12th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11031-019-09779-5"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11031-019-09779-5/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11031-019-09779-5)