Reference health

The Role of the Efficiency Gap for Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from the UK Electronics and Engineering Sectors

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-007-9031-y
CiteStamped reference-health badge
24/24 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-08

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 24 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1257/aer.89.3.605
Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela
resolves10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01802-7
Pooled estimators vs. their heterogeneous counterparts in the context of dynamic demand for gasoline
resolves10.1257/jel.38.3.569
Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata
resolves10.2307/146316
Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research
resolves10.1080/00343400050078105
Multinational Corporations and the Location of Technological Innovation in the UK Regions
resolves10.1093/oep/54.3.449
Foreign ownership and production efficiency: a quantile regression analysis
resolves10.1111/1467-9957.00237
The Impact on Domestic Productivity of Inward Investment in the UK
resolves10.2307/1885996
Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment, and the Transfer of Technology: A Simple Dynamic Model
resolves10.1111/1467-9442.00176
Multinationals without Advantages
resolves10.1111/1467-9485.00189
Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK?
resolves10.1016/S0304-3878(98)00041-8
International technology transfer and the technology gap
resolves10.1093/wbro/lkh019
Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?
resolves10.1111/1468-0297.00669
Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta‐Analysis
resolves10.1920/wp.ifs.2002.0222
Productivity convergence and foreign ownership at the establishment level
resolves10.3386/w8724
Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms?
resolves10.3386/w8573
International Technology Diffusion
resolves10.2307/1912528
Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles
resolves10.1016/0304-3878(94)90008-6
Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers
resolves10.1080/00220389608422430
Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDI in the Uruguayan manufacturing sector
resolves10.1111/1467-937X.00246
Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables
resolves10.1086/262040
Competition and Corporate Performance
resolves10.2307/2171831
The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry
resolves10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-F
Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels
resolves10.1080/00220389908422611
Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: Evidence from establishment data
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBarnes M, Martin R (2002) Business data linking: an introduction. Econ Trends 581:34–41
no DOI — not checkedDriffield N, Love J (2006) Does the motivation for foreign direct investment affect productivity spillovers to the domestic sector? Applied Economics Quarterly 52:3–27
no DOI — not checkedGirma S, Wakelin K (2001) Regional underdevelopment: is FDI the solution? A semiparametric analysis. CEPR Discussion Paper 2994
no DOI — not checkedGriffith R, Simpson H (2004) Characteristics of foreign-owned firms in British manufacturing. In: Blundell R, Card D, Freeman R (eds) Creating a premier league economy. Chicago University Press, Chicago
no DOI — not checkedHead K (1998) Comment on ‘comparing wages, skills, and productivity between domestically and foreign-owned manufacturing establishments in the United States.’ In: Baldwin R, Lipsey R, Richardson JD (eds) Geography and ownership as bases for economic accounting. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 255–258
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-08-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11079-007-9031-y"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11079-007-9031-y/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11079-007-9031-y/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11079-007-9031-y)