Reference health

Horizontal mergers and innovation in concentrated industries

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-019-09218-2
CiteStamped reference-health badge
29/29 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

16 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 29 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01053.x
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS POLICY, COMPETITION AND INNOVATION
resolves10.1016/j.jet.2015.01.001
Innovation by entrants and incumbents
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.09.003
Bargaining power and industry dependence in mergers
resolves10.3386/w22836
The Competitive Effects of Information Sharing
resolves10.3982/ECTA6994
Learning-by-Doing, Organizational Forgetting, and Industry Dynamics
resolves10.1007/s11129-017-9186-9
The timing of version releases: A dynamic duopoly model
resolves10.1007/s11129-011-9113-4
A dynamic quality ladder model with entry and exit: Exploring the equilibrium correspondence using the homotopy method
resolves10.1287/mksc.2016.1020
Measuring and Understanding Brand Value in a Dynamic Model of Brand Management
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.05.002
The effects of mergers with dynamic capacity accumulation
resolves10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01004-X
Fifty Years of Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity and Performance
resolves10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00097.x
Computable Markov-perfect industry dynamics
resolves10.2307/2297841
Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work
resolves10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.014
A simple model of mergers and innovation
resolves10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.03.001
Horizontal mergers and product innovation
resolves10.1093/qje/qjs025
Dynamic Games with Asymmetric Information: A Framework for Empirical Work*
resolves10.1086/664615
Does AMD Spur Intel to Innovate More?
resolves10.1007/s11129-013-9142-2
Competition and product innovation in dynamic oligopoly
resolves10.2307/2556046
A Dynamic Model of Endogenous Horizontal Mergers
resolves10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00057-8
Efficient representation of state spaces for some dynamic models
resolves10.1016/S0167-7187(96)01056-9
Market structure, innovation and vertical product differentiation
resolves10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.05.004
What drives merger waves?
resolves10.1287/mksc.1050.0144
Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for<i>Marketing Science</i>
resolves10.1111/1756-2171.12072
Estimation of cost efficiencies from mergers: application to US radio
resolves10.1257/jep.24.2.69
Taking the Dogma out of Econometrics: Structural Modeling and Credible Inference
resolves10.2139/ssrn.2506349
Better Together? Retail Chain Performance Dynamics in Store Expansion Before and after Mergers
resolves10.2307/2555975
Computing Markov-Perfect Nash Equilibria: Numerical Implications of a Dynamic Differentiated Product Model
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00241
Stochastic Algorithms, Symmetric Markov Perfect Equilibrium, and the 'curse' of Dimensionality
resolves10.1257/aer.97.5.1703
Antitrust in Innovative Industries
resolves10.1257/aer.20110948
Effects of Deregulation and Consolidation of the Broadcast Television Industry
The 16 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAckerberg, D., & Rysman, M. (2005). Unobserved product differentiation in discrete-choice models: estimating price elasticities and welfare effects. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 771–788.
no DOI — not checkedAghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: an inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701–728.
no DOI — not checkedBaumol, W., Panzar, J., Willig, R. (1982). Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
no DOI — not checkedCheong, K., & Judd, K. (2006). Mergers and dynamic oligopoly journal economic dynamics and control.
no DOI — not checkedDoraszelski, U., & Pakes, A. (2008). A framework for applied dynamic analysis in I.O. The Handbook of Industrial Organization.
no DOI — not checkedGilbert, R. (2006). Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: where are we in the competition-innovation debate? In A. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern (Eds.) Innovation policy and the economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedGilbert, R., & Sunshine, S. (1995). Incorporating dynamic efficiency concerns in merger analysis: the use of innovation markets. Antitrust Law Journal, 63(2), 569–601.
no DOI — not checkedIgami, M., & Uetake, K. (forthcoming). Mergers, innovation and entry-exit dynamics: the consolidation of the hard DIsk drive industry, pp. 1976-.2014. Working Paper.
no DOI — not checkedJudd, K. (1998). . Cambridge: MIT Press.
no DOI — not checkedKatz, M., & Shelanski, H. (2006). Mergers and innovation. Antitrust Law Journal, 74, 1–86.
no DOI — not checkedLoftus, P. (2014). Merck agrees to buy idenix for $3.85 billion. The Wall Street Journal.
no DOI — not checkedMarshall, G., & Parra, A. (2016). Innovation and competition: the role of the product market. Working paper.
no DOI — not checkedMermelstein, B., Nocke, V., Satterthwaite, M., Whinston, M. (forthcoming). Internal versus external growth in industries with scale economies: a computational model of optimal merger policy. Journal of Political Economy.
no DOI — not checkedMotta, M., & Tarantino, E. (2017). The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments. Working paper department of economics and business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
no DOI — not checkedPesendorfer, M. (2005). Mergers under entry. RAND Journal of Economics, 36, 661–679.
no DOI — not checkedShapiro, C. (2010). Competition and innovation: did arrow hit the bull’s eye? In J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.) The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited: University of Chicago Press.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11129-019-09218-2"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11129-019-09218-2/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11129-019-09218-2/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11129-019-09218-2)