Reference health
The Impacts of an Antitrust Investigation: A Case Study in Agriculture
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-09
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00441
The Time Series and Cross-Section Asymptotics of Dynamic Panel Data Estimators
resolves10.2307/2297968
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations
resolves10.2307/1924810
Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs
resolves10.2307/2109522
The Profitability of Price Fixing: Evidence From Stock Market Reaction to Federal Indictments
resolves10.1093/aepp/ppr032
Oligopsony Fed Cattle Pricing: Did Mandatory Price Reporting Increase Meatpacker Market Power?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb04783.x
Why Did NASDAQ Market Makers Stop Avoiding Odd‐Eighth Quotes?
resolves10.1007/s10842-006-0028-9
Effectiveness of Antitrust Sanctions on Modern International Cartels
resolves10.1257/089533003772034871
Does Antitrust Policy Improve Consumer Welfare? Assessing the Evidence
resolves10.1016/0167-7187(84)90034-1
Strategic and deterrent pricing responses to antitrust investigations
resolves10.1111/j.0020-6598.2005.00313.x
OPTIMAL CARTEL PRICING IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ANTITRUST AUTHORITY*
resolves10.1073/pnas.1009510107
Temperatures and cyclones strongly associated with economic production in the Caribbean and Central America
resolves10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00123-2
Auctions with almost common values: The `Wallet Game' and its applications
resolves10.1002/fut.3990100204
Dominant‐satellite relationships between live cattle cash and futures markets
resolves10.1007/s11151-011-9293-9
Introduction: Antitrust and the Dynamics of Competition in High-Tech Industries
resolves10.2307/1059690
Cartels and Antitrust: The Role of Fines in Deterring Violations at the Margin
resolves10.2139/ssrn.384100
The Effect of Antitrust Policy on Consumer Welfare: What Crandall and Winston Overlook
resolves10.1007/s10645-008-9103-4
Assessing the Effects of Antitrust Enforcement in the United States
resolves10.1007/s11151-011-9297-5
Does Antitrust Enforcement in High Tech Markets Benefit Consumers? Stock Price Evidence from FTC v. Intel
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedBailey, D., & Brorsen, B. W. (1985). Dynamics of regional fed cattle prices. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 10(1), 126–133.
no DOI — not checkedBarboza, D. (1997). 30 firms to pay $$\$900$$ $ 900 million in investor suit, New York Times. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/1997/12/25/business/30-firms-to-pay-900-million-in-investor-suit.html (Last accessed July 2013).
no DOI — not checkedBoyer, C. N., & Brorsen, B. W. (2013). Changes in beef packers’ market power after the Livestock Mandatory Price Reporting Act: An agent-based auction. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Available at http://ajae.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/04/17/ajae.aat005.full.pdf+html (Last accessed July 2013).
no DOI — not checkedFederal Trade Commission and Department of Justice. (2000). Antitrust guidelines for collaborations among competitors. Available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/10/jointventureguidelines (Last accessed July 2013).
no DOI — not checkedHorizontal Merger Guidelines (Department of Justice) (2010). http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.html (last accessed October 2013).
no DOI — not checkedInforma Economics, Inc. (2010). An estimate of the economic impact of GIPSA’s proposed rules, prepared for National Meat Institute. Available at http://www.meatami.com/ht/a/GetDocumentAction/i/64288 (Last accessed December 2013).
no DOI — not checkedKoch Group, Inc. (2005). Industrial marketing solutions for manufacturers. Available at http://www.kochgroup.com/benefits.html (Last accessed July 2013).
no DOI — not checkedMintert, J., Blair, J., Schroeder, T., & Brazle, F. (1990). Analysis of factors affecting cow auction price differentials. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 22(2), 23–30.
no DOI — not checkedPendell, D. L., & Schroeder, T. C. (2006). Impact of mandatory price reporting on fed cattle market integration. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 31(2), 568–579.
no DOI — not checkedU.S. Department of Agriculture, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration. (2008). Packers and stockyards statistical reports. Available at http://www.gipsa.usda.gov/GIPSA/webapp?area=newsroom&subject=landing&topic=pub-stat (Last accessed July 2013).
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11151-013-9415-7"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11151-013-9415-7/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11151-013-9415-7)