Reference health

An expected utility maximizer walks into a bar...

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-013-9167-7
CiteStamped reference-health badge
41/41 checkable references clean · checked 2026-07-26

Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.

10 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.

The 41 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2525382
The Construction of Utility Functions from Expenditure Data
resolves10.2307/1907921
Le Comportement de l'Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine
resolves10.1111/1468-0262.00302
Giving According to GARP: An Experimental Test of the Consistency of Preferences for Altruism
resolves10.1086/261558
A Theory of Rational Addiction
resolves10.1016/j.geb.2004.10.004
Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption–saving decisions
resolves10.1257/0002828043052222
Addiction and Cue-Triggered Decision Processes
resolves10.1007/BF01065371
Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability
resolves10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6527-10.2011
Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Disrupts Value Maximization in Humans
resolves10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.663
Dopamine, Reward Prediction Error, and Economics<sup>*</sup>
resolves10.1257/aer.97.5.1921
Consistency and Heterogeneity of Individual Behavior under Uncertainty
resolves10.1016/S0193-2306(2008)12
Risk Aversion in Experiments
resolves10.1257/jel.47.2.448
Gender Differences in Preferences
resolves10.1016/0022-0531(86)90076-1
An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom
resolves10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8
Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence
resolves10.1037/1064-1297.5.1.14
Effects of alcohol intoxication on the perceived consequences of risk taking.
resolves10.1257/aer.96.5.1449
A Dual-Self Model of Impulse Control
resolves10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00417.x
Harmful Addiction
resolves10.1257/aer.91.5.1539
GARP for Kids: On the Development of Rational Choice Behavior
resolves10.2307/2951749
The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories
resolves10.1257/000282802762024700
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
resolves10.1257/0002828054201459
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: New Data without Order Effects
resolves10.1093/med/9780195380538.001.0001
Introduction to Neuropsychopharmacology
resolves10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.010
One for the road: Public transportation, alcohol consumption, and intoxicated driving
resolves10.2307/145289
Marihuana and Work Performance: Results from an Experiment
resolves10.2307/1914185
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
resolves10.1017/CBO9780511803475
Choices, Values, and Frames
resolves10.1287/mnsc.31.6.738
The Effects of Problem Representation on the Sure-Thing and Substitution Principles
resolves10.1038/npp.2009.110
Neurocircuitry of Addiction
resolves10.1007/s00213-003-1628-2
Alcohol effects on human risk taking
resolves10.1007/s00213-007-0951-4
Modulation of human risky decision making by flunitrazepam
resolves10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00412.x
Viewpoint: On the generalizability of lab behaviour to the field
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.605
Alcohol myopia and condom use: Can alcohol intoxication be associated with more prudent behavior?
resolves10.1111/j.1540-5915.1974.tb00610.x
EFFECTS OF PROBLEM REPRESENTATION AND FEEDBACK ON RATIONAL BEHAVIOR IN ALLAIS AND MORLAT‐TYPE PROBLEMS
resolves10.2307/2998573
The Probability Weighting Function
resolves10.1126/science.1102384
Addiction as a Computational Process Gone Awry
resolves10.1017/S0140525X0800472X
A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process
resolves10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00056.x
An Experiment on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour
resolves10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.921
Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects.
resolves10.2307/1912771
The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis
resolves10.1007/BF01073402
An empirical test of ordinal independence
resolves10.1023/A:1007714509322
Common Consequence Conditions in Decision Making under Risk
The 10 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCamerer, C. (2011). The promise and success of lab-field generalizability in experimental economics: a critical reply to levitt and list. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1977749 or doi: /ssrn.1977749 , 10(2139).
no DOI — not checkedCook, P.J. (2007). Paying the tab: the costs and benefits of alcohol control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
no DOI — not checkedFitzgerald, E.F., & Hume, D.N. (1987). Intoxication test evidence: criminal and civil. San Francisco: Bancroft-Whitney.
no DOI — not checkedGlimcher, P.W., Camerer, C.F., Fehr, E., Poldrack, R.A. (2009). Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain. London: Academic Press.
no DOI — not checkedHey, J.D. (1995). Experimental investigations of errors in decision-making under risk. European Economic Review, 39(3–4), 633–640.
no DOI — not checkedHoutman, M., & Maks, J.A.H. (1985). Determining all maximal data subsets consistent with revealed preference. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 19, 89–104.
no DOI — not checkedKrishnamurti, T., Morewedge, C., Ariely, D. (2011). Focused on unfairness. Mimeo.
no DOI — not checkedList, J.A. (2006). Field experiments: a bridge between lab and naturally occurring data. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 6(2). Article 8. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/advances/vol6/iss2/art8 .
no DOI — not checkedMeyer, J., & Quenzer, L. (2005). Psychopharmacology: drugs, the brain, and behavior. Sunderland: Sinauer.
no DOI — not checkedO’Daire, A. (2009). Blood alcohol, breath alcohol, impairment and the law. AuthorHouse: Bloomington.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings, or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.

checked 2026-07-26 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record

Embed this badge

Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.

<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11166-013-9167-7"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11166-013-9167-7/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[![CiteStamped reference-health badge](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11166-013-9167-7/badge.svg)](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11166-013-9167-7)