Reference health
Teams developing business ideas: how member characteristics and conflict affect member-rated team effectiveness
1 of 38 checkable references need attention · checked 2026-08-09
At the dated check, the references listed below either did not resolve in Crossref or DataCite, or carried a retraction notice. Each one is shown with the registry record that put it there.
13 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
References needing attention
does not resolve to a known work10.5465/amr.1996.9605060217
The 37 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1177/014920639702300401
The Effects of Top Management Team Size and interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict
resolves10.2307/2393475
Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams
resolves10.1002/smj.4250100709
Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?
resolves10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.
resolves10.2307/2667020
To Your Heart's Content: A Model of Affective Diversity in Top Management Teams
resolves10.1007/s11187-006-9021-2
Corporate Governance and Strategic Change in SMEs: The Effects of Ownership, Board Composition and Top Management Teams
resolves10.2307/3069319
COMPARING ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY IN MANAGEMENT TEAMS: PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE EFFECTS.
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.07.001
Demographic diversity for building an effective entrepreneurial team: is it important?
resolves10.1016/0883-9026(94)90013-2
Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance
resolves10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.008
A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups
resolves10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3
Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance
resolves10.1002/smj.514
Effects of team inputs and intrateam processes on perceptions of team viability and member satisfaction in nascent ventures
resolves10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.001
Do others think you have a viable business idea? Team diversity and judges' evaluation of ideas in a business plan competition
resolves10.1023/A:1025045828202
Entrepreneurship and Start-Ups in the Boston Region: Factors Differentiating High-Growth Ventures from Micro-Ventures
resolves10.1007/s001680200104
The role of the university in attracting high tech entrepreneurship: A Silicon Valley tale
resolves10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00823.x
The Advantages of Using Standardized Scores in Causal Analysis
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.
resolves10.2307/2393638
A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict
resolves10.2307/2667054
Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict and Performance in Workgroups
resolves10.1177/1094428106298969
How Do Missing Data Bias Estimates of Within-Group Agreement? Sensitivity of
<i>
SD
<sub>WG</sub>
, CV
<sub>WG</sub>
, r
<sub>WG(J)</sub>
, r
<sub>WG(J)</sub>
</i>
* , and ICC to Systematic Nonresponse
resolves10.2307/2667029
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
resolves10.2307/20159576
CULTURAL DIVERSITY IN MANAGEMENT, FIRM PERFORMANCE, AND THE MODERATING ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION DIMENSIONS.
resolves10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities
resolves10.2307/256987
MAKING USE OF DIFFERENCE: DIVERSITY, DEBATE, AND DECISION COMPREHENSIVENESS IN TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.
resolves10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.102
Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust.
resolves10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407918
Learning and Performance in Multidisciplinary Teams: The Importance of Collective Team Identification
resolves10.2307/256593
CULTURAL DIVERSITY'S IMPACT ON INTERACTION PROCESS AND PERFORMANCE: COMPARING HOMOGENEOUS AND DIVERSE TASK GROUPS.
resolves10.1007/s11187-006-9044-8
Occupational Choice: The Influence of Product vs. Process Innovation
resolves10.2307/256366
ORGANIZATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY: THE DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF AGE AND TENURE DISTRIBUTIONS ON TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION.
The 13 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedAllison, P. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
no DOI — not checkedBird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
no DOI — not checkedBlau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.
no DOI — not checkedEisenhardt, K., Kahwajy, J., Bourgeois, L., & II, I. (1998). Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. In D. C. Hambrick, D. A. Nadler, & M. L. Tushman (Eds.), Navigating change (pp. 141–169). Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
no DOI — not checkedKamm, J., & Nurick, A. (1993). The stages of team venture formation: A decision-making model. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 17, 17–28.
no DOI — not checkedLankau, M., Ward, A., Amason, A., Ng, T., Sonnenfeld, J., & Agle, B. (2007). Examining the impact of organizational value dissimilarity in top management teams. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, 11–34.
no DOI — not checkedNunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
no DOI — not checkedShane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226. doi: 10.2307/259271 .
no DOI — not checkedTajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
no DOI — not checkedTajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory in intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
no DOI — not checkedUcbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2001). The focus of entrepreneurial research: Contextual and process issues. Entrepreneurship: theory & practice, 25, 57–80.
no DOI — not checkedWesthead, P., & Wright, M. (1998). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders in rural and urban areas. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 22, 63. 10.
no DOI — not checkedWilliams, K., & O’Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77–140). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-09 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11187-009-9176-8"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11187-009-9176-8/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11187-009-9176-8)