Reference health
The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention
20/20 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-08
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
5 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 20 checked references that resolve
resolves10.1136/jech.2009.088690
Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication?
resolves10.1002/asi.10302
An IP‐level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior
resolves10.1016/j.acalib.2006.05.005
Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination
resolves10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research
resolves10.5596/c09-014
Open access archiving and article citations within health services and policy research
resolves10.1108/00242530910978172
The Antaeus column: does the “open access” advantage exist? A librarian's perspective
resolves10.1002/asi.20663
The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv's condensed matter section
resolves10.1007/s11192-013-1167-5
Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications
resolves10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.003
Exploring scientists’ working timetable: Do scientists often work overtime?
The 5 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedDavis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., Connolly, M. J., & Godlee (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337(7665), 343–345.
no DOI — not checkedGarfield, E. (2004). What is the threshold for open access Nirvana? http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/3427.html2 .
no DOI — not checkedHarnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-lib Magazine, 10(6), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html . Accessed 16 Feb 2015.
no DOI — not checkedPriem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.4745 .
no DOI — not checkedPriem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/ . Accessed August 4, 2014.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-08 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0)