Reference health
General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology
53/53 checkable references clean · checked 2026-08-03
Every reference with a DOI in the deposited reference list resolved to a known work in Crossref or DataCite at the dated check, and none carried a retraction, withdrawal, or removal notice.
27 without a DOI — not checked. A reference deposited without a DOI is never matched by title or guessed at; it stays outside the checked set, and this line discloses that.
The 53 checked references that resolve
resolves10.2307/2094424
Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage
resolves10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1
A scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes
resolves10.1080/08109028.2011.601079
The interaction between public and private R&D expenditure and national productivity
resolves10.1504/IJSTM.2014.068857
Structure and organisational behaviour of public research institutions under unstable growth of human resources
resolves10.1080/09537325.2015.1095287
Radical innovations as drivers of breakthroughs: characteristics and properties of the management of technology leading to superior organisational performance in the discovery process of R&D labs
resolves10.1080/09537325.2016.1268682
Sources of technological innovation: Radical and incremental innovation problem-driven to support competitive advantage of firms
resolves10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.019
The source and nature of general purpose technologies for supporting next K-waves: Global leadership and the case study of the U.S. Navy's Mobile User Objective System
resolves10.1007/s11192-016-2027-x
Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration
resolves10.1504/IJIL.2014.059756
Organisational (un)learning of public research labs in turbulent context
resolves10.1007/s11192-014-1427-z
The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on the scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis
resolves10.1504/IJPOM.2009.027537
Project management in public research organisations: strategic change in complex scenarios
resolves10.1504/IJSTM.2010.029674
New entrepreneurial behaviour of public research organisations: opportunities and threats of technological services supply
resolves10.1080/01900692.2012.756889
Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior of Public Research Institutions
resolves10.1073/pnas.1510820113
Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration
resolves10.1126/science.1106340
Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance
resolves10.1016/j.ipm.2009.12.010
Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists
resolves10.1002/asi.10326
Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas
resolves10.1086/344935
New Technologies, Human‐Microbe Interactions, and the Search for Previously Unrecognized Pathogens
resolves10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.09.013
Philosophy, history and sociology of science: Interdisciplinary relations and complex social identities
resolves10.1037/10466-000
Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology's history.
resolves10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.59
Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences
resolves10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
Visualizing science by citation mapping
resolves10.1002/asi.21366
Discarding the ‘basic science/applied science’ dichotomy: A knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals
The 27 references without a DOI — listed, not checked
no DOI — not checkedCrane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedDavid, P. A. (1994). Positive feedbacks and research productivity in science: Reopening another black box. In O. Granstrand (Ed.), Economics of technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
no DOI — not checkedDe Solla Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science… and beyond. Columbia University Press, New York, Ch. 3.
no DOI — not checkedDogan, M., & Pahre, R. (1990). Creative marginality: Innovation at the intersections of social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
no DOI — not checkedFloreano, D., Husbands, P., & Nolfi, S. (2008). Evolutionary Robotics. In B. Siciliano & O. Khatib (Eds.), Springer handbook of robotics. Berlin: Springer.
no DOI — not checkedFreedman, P. (1960). The principles of scientific research (First edition 1949). London: Pergamon Press.
no DOI — not checkedGibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwatzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary society. London: Sage Publications.
no DOI — not checkedInternational Journal of Astrobiology. (2018). https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-astrobiology. Accessed May 2018.
no DOI — not checkedKlein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries. Knowledge, disciplinarities and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
no DOI — not checkedKuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd enlarged ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
no DOI — not checkedLatour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.
no DOI — not checkedLevin, S. G., & Stephan, P. E. (1991). Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. American Economic Review, 81(1), 114–132.
no DOI — not checkedNASA. (2018a). Astrobiology at NASA-Life in the Universe. https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/about/history-of-astrobiology/.
no DOI — not checkedNASA. (2018b). NASA Astrobiology Institute (NAI). https://nai.nasa.gov/about/. Accessed July 2018.
no DOI — not checkedNASA. (2018c). Exobiology. https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/research/astrobiology-at-nasa/exobiology/. Accessed July 2018.
no DOI — not checkedPan, R. K., Kaski, K., & Fortunato, S. (2012). World citation and collaboration networks: Uncovering the role of geography in science. Scientific Reports, 2(902), 1–7.
no DOI — not checkedPopper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
no DOI — not checkedRucker, R. B. (1980). Towards robot consciousness. Speculations in Science and Technology, 3(2), 205–217.
no DOI — not checkedScopus. (2018). https://www.scopus.com/search/form.uri?zone=TopNavBar&origin=sbrowse&display=basic. Accessed December 2018.
no DOI — not checkedSmall, A. W. (1905). General sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
no DOI — not checkedStephan, P. E. (1996). The economics of science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199–1235.
no DOI — not checkedStephan, P. E., & Levin, S. G. (1992). How science is done; Why science is done. In P. Stephan & S. Levin (Eds.), Striking the Mother Lode in science: The importance of age, place and time, Chapter 2 (pp. 11–24). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
no DOI — not checkedStorer, N. W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 55(1), 75–84.
no DOI — not checkedStorer, N. W. (1970). The internationality of science and the nationality of scientists. International Social Science Journal, 22(1), 80–93.
no DOI — not checkedThe American Microbiome Institute. (2015). http://www.microbiomeinstitute.org/humanmicrobiome. Accessed, 20 April, 2018.
no DOI — not checkedWagner, C. (2008). The new invisible college: Science for development. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
What this badge says. CiteStamped means the CHECKABLE references of this
work were clean at the dated check: each resolved to a known work in a public registry, and none
carried a retraction notice at that time. It says nothing about the quality, findings,
or importance of the work itself, and nothing about references deposited without a DOI.
checked 2026-08-03 — re-checked daily as this page is visited; titles and statuses come from Crossref and DataCite and are not part of the signed record
Embed this badge
Both snippets point at the live badge image and link back to this page. The badge re-renders from the daily check, so an embed never goes stale by more than a day of visits.
<a href="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8"><img src="https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8/badge.svg" alt="CiteStamped reference-health badge" width="460" height="64"></a>
[](https://citestamp.com/citestamped/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8)